Be Wise As Serpents 5 of 6 FRITZ SPRINGMEIER

SYMBOLOGY ASSOCIATED WITH THE BLOODLINE Symbols associated with the royal bloodline are the Holy Grail legends and initiations. The legend of the Round Table also is associated with the Grail, as well as a sacred stone. New Age, Masonic and esoteric literature abounds with references to Round Tables, sacred stones, and the

Holy Grail. The original Knights Templars were originally associated with the Prieure de Sion but split off. The Knights Templars’ leader was Jacques DeMolay after whom the Masonic boys’ group DeMolay is named after. The Knights Templars created and used the Skull and Crossbones as their emblem. After the King of France and

The Pope tried to eliminate the Templars they fled to various countries. Centuries old gravestones in Scotland from the years after the Knights Templars fled to Scotland can be seen with their skull and bones symbol. Merovee was the first of the Merovingian Kings. His son was King Childeric. Merovee’s tomb

Has not been found, but the tomb of his son King Childeric revealed a deep interest into magic and the occult. 300 beautiful miniture solid gold bees were found his tomb. The bee symbol has continued in various forms to represent the descendents of Merovee. The fleur-de-lies

Developed from it, and has been a prominent french logo, due to the heavy influence of the Merovingian descendants. Napoleon and his second wife Marie Louise Habsburg (a Merovingian descendent) took the 300 gold bees and had them sown onto their coronation robes. 11 Two prominent clues that the Mormon heirarchy

Has ties to the Prieure de Sion and the Merovingians are 1. their belief Mary Magdalene was Christ’s wife and that Christ had children and 2. the prominence the bee symbol is given. Bees are used by Deseret Industries, are the official symbol of Utah, and are used in the

Mormon temples. Further, the geneologies that the LDS Mormon presidents have published of themselves all trace their lineage back to the Merovingians, Sythians, Sicambri, and Cimmerians, and to Anna a relative of Jesus Christ. (See Appendix.) Another symbol of the Merovingians was Merovee’s

Birthmark, which was a red cross. The red cross has been prominent symbol of the Knights Templars, and groups with ties to Freemasonry including the modern Red Cross. The red cross was an important symbol for Charles T. Russell, who was a Knights Templar

And was placed on his Watch Tower magazines and at the IBSA conventions. It appears that the Russell family has ties of some kind to the New World Order. (See appendix.) Hopefully, in the process of studying these first two units the reader has come to appreciate the many connections between groups like the

Rosicrucians, Masons, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and the various New Age groups. THE YEAR 2000 The period of time designated 2000 on our calender should not hold any intrinsic special significance. It is merely a decision on the part of some of mankind to designate and associate that period of time with the number 2000.

In terms of any Biblical chronology that supposedly God must be following it can’t intrinsically have any significance either after the various calender changes, the years of error between Christ’s death and when the A.D. counting begins etc. Our modern way of accounting days is even different

From the Bible which views the evening (from sunset) and the morning (the following period of daylight) as a day. Yet, many people have been convinced that the year 2000 is something special. It is like Kennedy’s end-of-the-decade man- on-the-moon belief that America took up so heartedly. “Those closest to John Paul [II]… became

Convinced that, in the wake of the shooting, the pope was motivated, perhaps even obsessed, by the thought that something dramatically decisive would happen to the world by the year 2000. He has said so on more than one occasion as he sat with

His trusted and beloved Polish Mafia in the papal apartment. They have noticed his growing commitment to eschatology, which incorporates the view based on biblical teachings that God will inaugurate his kingdom through a series of ‘happenings’ to close the second Christian millenium, December 31, 1999.”12

Robert Mueller, Assistent Secretary of the United Nations, and respected Catholic leader in his book The New Genesis believes that the New World Order and its One-World-Religion will be ushered in by the year 2000. He calls 2000 “A Bimillennuim Celebration of Life, the advent

Of an Era of Peace, a Golden Age, and the First Millennium of World Harmony and Human Happiness.” He directs us. “Yes, we must join our Hindu brethren and call henceforth our planet ‘Brahma’ or the Planet of God.” 13 According to Mueller his religious mentor or “master”

As he calls him was the Secretary of the UN U Thant. U Thant is a Burmese Buddhist who advocates a One-World-Govemment One-World-Religion.14 To help see his words come true, Mueller along with some others founded Planetary Citizens, a group that encourages people worldwide to try to force their nations into a One-World-Government

By the year 2000. 15 From every angle of the One-World-Religion come remarkably similar feelings of foreboding concerning the year 2000. 33° Mason President Bush, who is to inaugurate the new millenium in with ceremonies at the Great Pyramid, has been pushing forward his Globalism 2000 curriculum.

The Watchtower Society continues to hint that the year 2000 is the big year. The Theosophical Society in their book On the Watchtower, p. 351, also tells us that the year 2000 is to be the year to bring in the New Age. CHART OF BELIEFS FROM WRITINGS OF VARIOUS

LEADERS [PLACE CHART IN THIS AREA] For those readers who are being given a hard time for studying the Conspiracy and charts showing the connections of the various SPIN nodes, read note 16. 16 PLANS Who makes the plans for the various New Order Religious groups? How do these plans compare? How much of their

Plans do we know about? How firm are their plans? There are basically two levels of plans—the esoteric and the exoteric. The insiders have the real plans, the public is given through various channels the plans in slightly altered form. The various groups adjust the esoteric plans to match what they can pragmatically give their

Own audience. The key then is to decide what has been added for the “benefit” of some particular audience. For the Jehovah’s Witnesses they will be told that they are the only ones who will be saved when the revolution for the Golden Age comes. The terminology for this has changed to “the

Battle of Armaggeddon.” But in the older WT publications both the words revolution and Golden Age have been associated with these events. For the New Agers they will be promised that every one will become gods. For the Industrialists they will be promised that a great age of prosperity will arrive

From a global economy without any tariff barriers. (As a person who has lived in Europe, Asia, Africa, and North America, my opinion is that this is a big lie. It might seem like an interesting theory to someone deluded by their propoganda sitting in an ivory tower at the Rockefeller Center. But

It ignores realities. A socialist world government will signal poverty for the masses on the scale Russia and Red China have. The New World Order has been killing the goose that laid the golden egg—they have been draining America of its wealth and resources for their wild global

Schemes. There are mutually beneficial system of trade but the globalism rhetoric of the One- Worlders is propoganda. First the globalism is built on principles that are opposite of about every economic principle that the Bible gives us. I tend to believe the Bible’s age old wisdom rather than Rockefeller and Kissinger. Can Americans

Really think that becoming one-nation economically with Mexico is going to benefit them? If hordes of poor people destroy what others have cared for like the serfs did in Russia to the belongings of the middle class, and American industry moves to where the people will allow

Themselves to work for slave wages, will this really benefit Americans? Our leaders are reducing the American people to a nation of serfs. And comrade I don’t care to be a serf if I have a choice, how about you?) In the next pages, plans and stategies of the various groups will be looked at.

MASONIC PLANS The best sources of Masonic plans are the plans that were discovered long ago and have been written about for centuries. These include the Bavarian Illuminati plans, the plans that Robison, the Scottish Mason revealed in his expose, and the Protocols of Sion originating from a Mizraim

Masonic Lodge. Because these are so well known, and the reader may have already formed an opinion on these, this chapter will cover other sources. SOURCE A- 33° Manly P. Hall’s writings SOURCE B- La Franc-maconnerie dans sa veritable signification along with La Franc – maconnerie en elle-meme et dans sa rapport

Avec les autres Societes Secretes de L’Europe. Both were printed at Liege, 1854 and 1855), torn. i.,pp. 28,29 ff. SOURCE C- Adams. Real Wealth, Financial Poverty. London, 1925. SOURCE D- Descamps. (ed. by Claudio Janet) Les Societes Secretes et la Societe, vol. i, (4th ed.) Paris, France, 1881, pp. lxx-lxxi, and

Lxxviii and cf. Appendix III. SOURCE A- Masonry’s greatest philosopher according to the Scottish Rite Journal was Manly P. Hall. In Hall’s book America’s Assignment With Destiny he puts forth his belief that Columbus worked with Lorenzo de Medici and an esoteric society related to the Masons to “discover”

America. What he is attempting to show is that America has always played a role in esoteric plans, even before its public discovery by Columbus. His other book The Secret Destiny of America comes out and states repeatedly that the Masons have big plans for America and these

Are to create Plato’s Republic, aka Bacon’s New Atlantis in this nation. Manly P. Hall in his other books repeatedly shows us that Masonry intends a Universal religion, that this universal religion will be eclectic like the Hindu religion or the New Age movement and will be a continuation of the mysteries.

Although the specific tactics and other details like the names of modern day people carrying out the Masonic plans are not given, Hall does provide a portrait of the basic framework of what they are up to. SOURCE B- This source gives us the details

Of a pattern that has repeatedly been used successfully by the Masonic Lodge. One Masonic researcher claims every Masonic inspired revolution (such as Europe’s and Latin America’s for the last 200 years) has used this. It appears his claim is correct. What is done is to create two movements—one

That promotes Pacifism, the other to promote overzealous nationalism. The Pacifist group attacks, enfeebles, and undermines existing authorities of various kinds. This allows the second group to attack those remaining authorities. In all cases it is hard to show a conspiracy between the two apparently different opposing and covertly cooperating groups. The cooperation

Is more visible after the nationalistic group succeeds, because then they place the surviving Pacifistic party into administrative positions. SOURCE C- The Mason Adams writes that credit can be used to control a. the press, b. international news-agencies, c. and the book market. SOURCE D- Two types of groups are created—Masonic

And non-Masonic. The Masonic groups are what are called Masonic External Activity Committees. They function to provide a. instruction (to lay schools, through training and seminars) b. benevolence (hospitals, burn centers, and support of groups not tied to any Christian group —that are ecumenical in nature) c. propoganda to promote the separation of church

And state, to promote the secularization of society, to promote civil marriage, and the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity. The second group are non-Masonic groups who in some way promote some aspect of the Masonic plan. Descamps describes these, “Along with this is the creation of non-Masonic bodies, often secretive, controlled by Masons that

Are at least partially identical with the Freemasons’ goals. These groups work for the realization of some special aspect of the overall Masonic plan.” “The lodges do not form the complete framework of the army of the Revolution…Under them are numberless popular organizations, circles and associations of all kinds, which are nothing else

Simplified forms of Freemasonry…These reach the classes which Freemasonry cannot admit into the lodges.” THE NEW AGE MOVEMENTS PLANS Gerald and Patricia Mische who were co-sponsors of the organization Planetary Initiative for the World We Choose have spelled out in detail

In their book Toward a Human World Order many of the plans for bringing in a One World Religion/Economy/Government. The Paulist Press, a press connected to the Catholic Church published their book Toward a Human World Order. The Paulist Press is now an instrument of the New World Order and its scams like Liberation Theology.

Another book that spells out the details of the New Age movement’s plan is The Externalisation of the Hierarchy by Alice Bailey. Indeed, the book is designed to be a textbook on how The Plan is to unfold. Pages and quotes from this book have already been introduced to

The reader in chapters 1.1 and 1.2. It has been pointed out that The Externalisation of the Hierarchy teaches that the three channels to bring in the One-World-Religion are the Church, the Masonic Lodge, and education. Other references saying this are in this footnote. ILLUMINATI PLANS FOR 1992-1999 THE SEVEN YEARS OF TRIBULATION

The following outline is based on interviews with ex-members of the Illuminati hierarchy and verified by this Author’s extensive research. Illuminati plans include the following: a. callbacks for all the people who they have programmed. This have already been going on. b. increased visibility of homosexuality and its promotion.

C. increased socialism. d. what might be called Operation Black Widow- Satanists make a big final push to gain access to all secrets, and to kill and replace people of power with their own people. All governmental leaders not in their program are targeted. All governments are targets of infiltration.

E. Nuclear reactors will come under their control. f. Nuclear weapons will come under their control through some agency such as the UN. g. Poisoned Van Dynn candy already warehoused will be released to kill children. h. Federal buildings and federal records are targeted for destruction.

I. increased control of all human activities. j. a special tasteless truth serum formula will be released into public water supplies to aid Satanists in interrogating people to determine their alligences. The antidotes have already been prepared for the occult groups. k. a helter skelter period of mass anarchy

1. an alien invasion m. a third world war n. another mid-east conflict o. The drug war will turn into a shooting war in South America, it will increasingly be used to take away what little civil rights are actually remaining on the books.

P. Jupiter will be exploded by a satellite that is travelling to it, and will supposedly light up like a sun. This will be the sign in the heavens for Lucifer to take office. q. Economies will be destroyed. r. A cashless controlled society will be created. s. Europe’s power will be revived. Jerusalem

Will be prepared as the place Satan will reign. t. 10 regional states will pave the way toward a single world state. u. epidemics. v. reduction of the world’s population w. elimination of true Christians. M. E. Haselhurst, of Lucis Trust, emphasizes

To New Agers that there is a Plan. “Humanity needs to realize that there Is a Plan and to recognize its influence in unfolding world events, even when these appear as hindering factors, operating by means of destruction.”19 WICCA PLANS In 1981, law-enforcement officials confiscated

A paper that had been written for the 1981 Witches International Coven Council (WICCA). This paper gave the goals for the International Coven Council. Among the objectives on that paper were the following: •To bring about personal debts, causing discord and disharmony within families. •To remove or educate the “new-age youth”

By: a) infiltrating boys’/girls’ clubs and big sister/brother programs. b) infiltrating schools, having prayers removed, having teachers teach about drugs, sex, freedoms. c) instigating and promoting rebellion against parents and all authority. •To have laws changed to benefit our ways, such as:

A) removing children from the home environment and placing them in our foster homes b) mandatory placement of children in our daycare centers c) open drug and pornography market to everyone.20 Notes. 1. Hall, Manly P. The Secret Destiny of America. Los Angeles, CA: Philosophical Research

Society, 1972, pp. 23-24. 2. Interview with Ian Taylor on Free Masonry: From Darkness To Light (video). Jeremiah Films. 3. William Cooper, ex-member of Naval Intelligence CINCPACFLT who had a security clearance of Top Secret, Q, Sensitive Compartmentalized Information. William Cooper has a very interesting story to tell. Whether the listener

Will agree with him completely or not he is someone worth listening to. 4. Plato, The Republic, cf. Laws. 5. Told to author by a descendant of Mary Baker Eddy. 6. Hall, op. cit. p. 45. 7. Ibid., p.59. 8. Read Holy Blood, Holy Grail and then for further study read the Christian book which

Is based on that book Guardians of The Grail by J.R. Church.(Oklahoma City,OK: Prophecy Publications, 1989.) 9. Church, op. cit., p. 86 Based on Baigent, Lincoln and Leigh’s research. 10. Baigent, Lincoln, and Leigh. Holy Blood Holy Grail, p. 206. 11. Church, op. cit., p. 81-82. 12. Thomas, Gordan and Max Morgan-Witts. Pontiff.

Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company,Inc.,1983, p.442. 13. Mueller, Robert. New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality. NY: Image Books, 1984, p. 186. 14. ibid., p. 169-171. 15. Keyes, Donald. Earth at Omega: Passage to Planetization. Boston: Brandon Press, 1982, pp. 96,98. 16. One Christian writer writes, “The Fallacy

Of Conspiracy Theories…We do not have time to trace endless charts and seek to find relationships between earthly political powers….It is a fruitless effort in view of Christ’s victory over all powers and dominions and thrones.” (Eph. 1:21) This sounds very good, but how much Christian activity is fruitful toward Christ’s victory?

This Author has been verbally told this same thing as this Christian writer’ quote, but I suspect it is only an excuse to justify ignorance and lack of zeal. Those who spout this line have not been out using their time wisely, they sit in front of the T.V. and watch sitcoms and

The news, they go to worldly movies, they fritter away their time with 101 little meaningless items of life, they spend inordinate amount of time on hobbies and games. They read the newspapers, they read novels. But they don’t have time to study their enemy. Don’t let any accuse you of wasting your

Time reading this book and making you feel guilty or wrong for doing so. You the reader are to be commended. You are reading a “newspaper” that is telling the real story for once from a biblical standpoint. If your friends read the worldly papers, why can’t you read a Christian

Paper such as Be Wise As Serpents? These people who are against studying their enemy are the ones who are placing Satan worshippers into high church positions, they are these people who welcome Jehovah’s Witnesses as Christian brothers even though the JWs don’t reciprocate, and

These people are not defending the faith that was delivered to the Apostolic Church. From personal experience, I know those out in the trenches doing spiritual warfare out of devotion to the Kingdom, have found apathy in the general Christian population. This apathy stems in part

Due to a total lack of wisdom and knowledge of what is going on. 17. The interested person who wants to maintain America’s liberty and standard of living should read The Trade Threat and U.S. Trade Policy by John M. Culbertson which challenges the globalism rhetoric. 18. Khul, Djwhal, “The Restoration of the

Mysteries”, The Beacon (May, ’63) in Corinne Heline. Mystic Masonry and the Bible. La Canada, CA: New Age pub., 1975. 19. Haselhurst, M.E., art. “The Plan and Its Implementation,” The Beacon, Sept./Oct. 1975, p. 147. 20. Frattarola, John, art. “America’s Best Kept Secret,” in Passport, special edition, 1986, p.5. Chapter 2.13

The Second Tower of Babel “SUBMIT TO OUR HIERARCHY AND WE WILL GIVE YOU FREEDOM.” This paraphrases the Pied Piper appeals of the elite that plans to continue ruling the New World Order that they are bringing in. Alice Bailey’s book Externalisation of the Hierarchy is so blatant about spelling out their plans

It is somewhat unnerving. Her book is for teaching New Agers about their Plans, so even though it does tell what they are going to do, it describes events in terminology that would appeal to its readers. Just as the Greeks camoflaged their intentions

With the Trojan Horse, the New World Order is window dressing their socialist dictatorship to make it appear to be what the public wants. And like the Trojans, Americans are busy pulling the Trojan Horse of the New World Order into their fortifications. (Chap. 1.14 is an example

Of how people’s perception of what the New Order is may be quite out of line from what they are really going to get.) PROMISES, PROMISES! Alice Bailey tells us that this Hierarchy of Rulers wants to bring us “salvation”, “spiritual intercourse” (whatever that is), “a new world”

(we all like new things), to be led by a “new group of world servers” ( great! some more public servants).1 (If you are one to have swallowed what some “Christian” authors are telling us that Alice Bailey and Lucis Trust have no significance, check the appendix out and note that members

Of Lucis Trust have high positions of power. Note also the addresses of Lucis Trust are 866 United Nations Plaza and Whitehall Court in London.) LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION A clique of about 300 Powerful Jewish men has sway over the affairs of the world. This group includes the the Jewish Rockefeller family

And the Rothschild family. The close connections between the House of David and the “Black” Nobility that has ruled over Europe is a topic for another complete book. We can only touch on the subject. The purported lineage of David is guarded by the

Prieure de Sion and the lineage of the Black Nobility by the Knights of Malta. The Grand Master of the Prieure de Sion (inducted in 1981) stated that his organization contained Knights of the Order of Malta within its ranks. Indeed, the previous Grand Master of the Prieure de Sion

Abbe’ Francois Ducard-Bourget was also the Magistral Chaplain of the Knights of Malta. 2 Commenting on the two orders which are protecting two different powerful bloodlines The Messianic Legacy says, “…both Orders could be expected to function in much the same sphere, the twilight underworld where politics, finance,

Religion and the work of various intelligence agencies converge. Undoubtedly, too, the Knights of Malta and the Prieure de Sion had certain interests and certain objectives in common. Both Orders…were apparently intent on the creation of some sort of United States of Europe. And the

History of both Orders, assuming the Prieure’s pedigree to be authentic, would have been closely intertwined. Both claim a heritage back to the Crusades…” 3 By international law, the Knights of Malta are an independent sovereign nation, a principality, although the U.K. which has the Protestant

Branch of this order called the Order of St. John does not recognize the Order of Malta’s passports. At least 30 nations do recognize the Order of Malta’s passports. 4 Nearly half of the Knights of Malta’s 10,000 members belong to Europe’s Black Nobility, that is Europe’s oldest and most powerful families.

The head of the Black Nobility claims descent from the last Roman emperior.5 The Knights of Malta are closely allied with the Vatican, the Masons, and the CIA. That the Prieure de Sion (allied with Scottish & Mizraim Rites) and the Knights of Malta are cooperating peacefully with each other, considering that the bloodlines they

Represent were once in competition means that an alliance between the House of David and the Black Nobility is solidly in place. Further, the Askenazim Jewish Banking families such as the Rothschilds have allied themselves to all this through marriage and business. From the historical evidence, this Author believes that Mason/Rosicrucian Napoleon,

Who conquered Malta from the Knights of Malta and the Papal States along with the Pope, was able to realign those powers in some way with Illuminati goals. Freemasonry itself had been already been subverted by the Sanhendrin and the Illuminati. A Grand Alliance of the various powerful

Bloodlines, Freemasonry, and the Jewish Sanhedrin occured back in the early 1800s. However, the manipulation of events to centralize their power was a gradual process. For instance, the first passports issued by any state was done under the Masonic rule of France after the French Revolution. Yet, it wasn’t until after W.W.I,

That the One-World-Power could justify restricting the free travel of the nations with passport requirements. 6 THE BILDERBERGERS The alliance of the great powers can be seen in the meetings of the Bilderbergers. This group consists of leaders from the Black Nobility, the Jewish Banking families, the Freemasons, and

The Internationalists. The real power of the Bilderbergers recides in the Inner Core, which consists of 3 groups of 13 for a total of 39. This Inner Core then answer to the Policy Committee which consists of 13. The Policy Committee answers to a Round Table of 9. WILLIAM OF ORANGE’S FAMILY

One of the most powerful men within the Bilderbergers is Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. He still retains influence, even after giving up the chairmanship. His family, the Hapsburgs, are descendents of some powerful blood lines, including the House of Orange and the Roman Emperors. Prince Bernhard was the first chairman

Of the Bilderbergers. He is the husband of the Queen of the Netherlands, who abdicated in favor of her daughter. Prince Bernhard’s wife Queen Julianna has been estimated to be worth around $2 billion dollars.7 She holds stock in Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon. She holds the masonic

Title of “Protectress of the Craft [Freemasonry]”. She and the Prince have played an active role in Freemasonry. In 1957, for instance, she received the Grand Masters attending an international conference at the Hague. Prince Philip of Orange gave the Grand Lodge’s building while he was Grand Master, and also donated 7,000 books to

Its library.7a The Orange family have been important in Freemasonry over the years. The Bilderberger meetings are secret, but several investigators, especially one has been able to get information each year on the ongoings. From the tidbits that come out of what happens, it is evident that decisions made at the Bilderberger

Meetings soon translate into official policy of the nations around the world. Some of the men in 1966, that attended the Bilderberger’s meeting were Henry Kissinger, Palme of Sweden, Bieusheuval of The Netherlands, Gerald Ford of the United States; Helmut Schmidt of West Germany; Rumor of Italy, and Giscard d’ Estaing of France (d’Estaing was

At the 1968 meeting but not at the 1966.) 8 The high ranking Mason Gerald Ford (originally named Leslie King) had attended the 1962, 1964, 1965, 1966, and 1970 Bilderberger meetings. The significance of these men being delegates in 1966 might at first glance elude the reader today,

Because they have since been chief-executives or in top level government positions. However, the significance is that these men in 1966 were relatively unknowns. Within eight years these Bilderbergers had become prominent. ONE ITEM TO SHOW THE BILDERBERGER’S POWER-THEIR DESTRUCTION OF A PRESIDENT This raises the question, didn’t Gerald Ford

Just happen to become President? William Still, who has recently written the book New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies, became interested in the subject that his and this book concern when his father Lt. Col. William

L. Still, was approached by someone who asked his father how he would feel if there was a military takeover of the U.S. government and implicating that Nixon wanted to take over. The day was about October 15, 1973. Nixon was in trouble with Watergate. Still’s father

Wrote a memorandum warning that a military coup was being planned to put Nixon into office for a third term by any means. William Still researched that mysterious coup that never happened, and as a result became aware that things are in serious

Trouble for this nation, as we approach the slavery of the New World Order. William Still writes, “I hope the publication of this book will stimulate the release of new data…” If William Still is reading this book, I would like to give him new data and fill him in

On what happened. But this will not be the story he expected. In dealing with operations done by the CIA and intelligence agencies, one is dealing with a world of lies and counterlies. There are so many layers of lies that the truth is difficult to unbury,

But once it is, the lies often fall apart. “The man who must depend upon research and investigation inevitably falls victim to the many pitfalls of the secret world and of the cover world with its lies and counterlies.”—Contact officer between the CIA and the DOD (Dept. of

Defense) from 1955 to Dec. 1963. Many of the Army, Navy, and Airforce leadership are CIA assets.9 Many of the people in the U.S. Government are CIA assets. The CIA has spent many years and much money to get their CIA assets into all the various areas of the

Government.10 The CIA is adept at leaking or creating false stories that have all the earmarks of being true. In his book Prouty debunks the “Pentagon Papers”. The Pentagon Papers appeared to be an expose of the U.S. government. Actually, they

Were manufactured by the CIA and were simply fiction. What Lt. Gen. Still had “leaked” to him was a carefully orchestrated smokescreen, a diversion. By having their CIA assets in the government start the rumors going around that Nixon was going to create a dictatorship by a military coup, they allowed their military

Coup to go undetected. Their take-over actions almost looked like a response to Nixon’s supposed coup. It was brilliant. To further cover their tracks several misleading books have been published subsequently that are written by participants of those days. The following events took place.(You can believe

This or not—it is presented simply as an example of how powerful the Bilderburgers are, that they make and toss away Presidents. To conserve space this section will not go into why they wanted to elect Nixon and then toss him. If you are interested, others are also capable of telling you why.)

BASIC U.S. POLICY PROCESS Chart by Fritz Springmeier DOCUMENTATION WITH EXPLANATIONS CONCERNING MJ-12 My own secret sources of information indicate two items: a. that the highest levels of Satanism, commonly known as the Illuminati, control the CFR and other top-level decision making groups in the U.S. government. b. that the highest levels of Satanism have

On-going direct contact with the aliens (actually demons) and work with them. c. that a group of men commonly known as Majesty 12 or MJ-12 does indeed exist, and they direct the United States, and are aware of ongoing work with the “aliens”.

From this limited confidential information, I have proceeded to try to gleen more information to pad out my picture and hopefully the reader’s too of what is happening. Further information on MJ-12 has come from a number of sources. The following documents pertaining to MJ-12

Are included for the reader. DOCUMENT 1. Federal Register pages which are called “Presidential Findings” and are available to House and Senate Intelligence Committees. The first set of pages are Executive Order 10700 by President Eisenhower, Further Providing for the Operations Coordinating Board, February 27, 1957.

The story behind these Federal Register pages are as follows: Nelson Rockefeller, member of the Illuminati, and Dwight Eisenhower began planning in 1953 for the creation of a secret governing committee from 13 to 19 men to rule the United States in cooperation with the aliens

(demons). Some type of authority had to be given the group from the executive branch and some type of cover had to be given it also. The secret Executive Memorandum NSC 5510 set up a permanent Majority 12 committee. Soon afterwards in Mar. 1955, NSC 5412/1 set up the cover

Story-a group which had Nelson Rockefeller at its top. The cover group was entitled “the Policy Coordinating Group.” As the PCG or Policy Coordinating Group actually was a front for a real group that did and still does rule the United States, people in government correctly realized

Its enormous power and have refered to this secret ruling body in different ways over the years. In 1974 Thomas Ross and and David Wise came out with the book The Invisible Government by Random House. Because this book revealed

This group which was called “the Special Group” or “54/12” the name of the group was changed. Marchetti pointed out in his book CIA and The Cult of Intelligence that the Special Group changes its name each time its cover name is revealed to the public. The following are some of the

Names it has gone by: a. Special Study Group b. Wise Men c. Operations Coordinating Board (OCB) d. 5412 Committee – Eisenhower & Kennedy Administration e. 303 Committee – Johnson Administration f. 40 Committee – Nixon, Ford, Carter Administrations g. PI-40 – Reagon Administration

H. The Unholy 13 – the name Brig. Gen. Exon claims to have used i. Majesty 12, Majority 12, (its level of secrecy is labelled MAJIC) DOCUMENT 2. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s testimony to the Jackson Subcommittee about policy-making at the Presidential Level for the National Security Council

In 1965. McNamara’s testimony is that he and Dean Rusk did not automatically adopt any proposed policy put forth by a study group– but historically it can be seen that the Study Group was calling the shots. We can see the impact of the Special Study Group by close attention to

The next Document, JK 516 A5 The Investigation…of the Intelligence Agencies, Book 5. DOCUMENT 3. JK 516 A5- Cover page of Book V, and page 100 (which was Appendix C) show that the Study Group did formulate policy. DOCUMENT 4. USAF Office of Special Investigations

Document describing the analysis of film taken near the AFB of Kirtland in 1980 which refers to in paragraph 2 “…OFFICIAL US GOVERNMENT POLICY AND RESULTS OF PROJECT AQUARIUS IS STILL CLASSIFIED TOP SECRET WITH NO DISSEMINATION OUTSIDE OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHANNELS AND WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS TO “MJ

TWELVE”. SPECAT (special category messages) sent from MAJESTY CONTROL (evidently MJ-12) have been seen by intelligence officers with high clearances. Such SPECAT have been called MAJESTY ADVISORY. At other times a Majesty 12’s orders have been called Majority 12 Directives. Intelligence people with Q clearance and Presidential

Approval were classified “MAJESTIC” on Project REDLIGHT. Extremely sensitive material is classified MAJIC. It appears from the numerous sources that the secret MJ-12 governing group uses MJ in connection with the words MAJIC, MAJORITY, and MAJESTIC. FALSE DOCUMENT. The pages of what is called the “Briefing Document: Operation Majestic

12 Prepared For President-Elect Dwight D. Eisenhower” are a CIA/NSC attempt to muddy the waters with a fake document. Because the public began to learn some real facts about MJ-12, a special operation called MAJESTIC to decieve the public was carried out by three intelligence

Men, Stanton Friedman, William Moore, and Jaime Shandera. Supposedly Jaime Shandera got some 35mm film and realized what he had after he developed it. It was labelled a briefing document for President-elect Eisenhower concerning MJ-12. The document has big errors in it, the dating is not written as per how it was

Done then, the Rosewell Army Air Field and Walker Air Force Base are misnamed Rosewell Army Air Base and Walker Field. The dating and the name of the base would have had to have been done correctly under real circumstances. Much information has come out exposing these three

Men who claim to have come upon this document as intelligence men. They and others have been actively trying to muddy the waters. Although a Study Group had been established even four years before the MJ-12 Study Group it appears it wasn’t as all encompassing as the one established by Rockefeller in 1954. This prior

Study Group (called ECG- Executive Coordination Group) can be identified in the National Security Council directive identifiable as the top secret annex to NSC-4 called NSC-4A. Later NSC-10/1 and NSC-10/2 superseded NSC-4 and NSC-4A and expanded the work of the Study Group. It appears the ECG was somewhat ad

Hoc, and that the people making up the group varied from meeting to meeting, and problem to problem, whereas MJ-12 is a fixed group. After Pres. John Kennedy tried to abolish MJ-12 as the control center, the Study Group retained its power but became acephalous.

When the men of MJ-12 (the 5412 committee) began meeting, it was neccessary that extreme secrecy be established for it is hard to hide so many important men getting together. In 1954, the Quantico Marine Base was used. Later meetings were held at the Marine Base at Quantico, VA

And the group became known as Quantico II according to William Cooper. Rockefeller built a retreat somewhere in Maryland that can only be reached by air. Then the Group was able to fly in and maintain the seclusion they desired. The retreat’s code name is “the Country Club” and it has complete living, eating, recreation,

Library and meeting facilities according to William Cooper. Money for the Study Group was made available through a multimillion dollar secret fund kept by the Military Office of the White House. Some money was periodically transferred from this fund to the Kennedy family up until 1967.

The Kennedy family is one of the 13 leading Illuminati families. It is not known why this money was being transferred secretly by courier. Finally, if we look at who serves on MJ-12 there are basically three groups. Six scientists and

Experts of the Executive Committee of the Jason Group which is under the Mitre Corp. Six men of the Executive Committee of the CFR which are all members of the Masonic Order of the Quest and members of the Jason Society (not to be confused with the Jason Group). The other

Men are usually high-ranking Freemasons who control the FBI, the CIA and other key positions in the Government and Intelligence. The Kingpin members of MJ-12 are part of the Illuminati, and regularly participate in the highest levels of Satanism. DOCUMENT 1. Federal Register pages Executive Order 10700 by President

Eisenhower, Further Providing for the Operations Coordinating Board, February 27, 1957 By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes, and as President of the United States, it is hereby or- dered as follows: SECTION I. (a) In order to assist in the effective coordination

Among certain agencies of certain functions relating to the national security and to provide for the integrated implementation of na- tional security policies by the said agencies, there is hereby estab- lished within the structure of the National Security Council the Op- erations Coordinating Board, hereinafter referred to as the Board,

Which shall report to the National Security Council. (b) The Board shall have as members the following: (1) the Under Secretary of State, who shall represent the Secretary of State, (2) the Deputy Secretary of Defense, who shall represent the Secretary of Defense, (3) the Director of Central Intelligence, The Director of the International Cooperation Administration, and (6) one or more representatives of the President to be designated by the President. The Board shall have a chairman and a vice chairman, each of whom shall be designated by the President from among its members. Each head of agency referred to in items 1

To 5, inclusive, in this subsection may provide for an alternate member who shall serve as a member of the Board in lieu of the regular member representing the agency concerned whenever such regular member is, for reasons beyond his control, unable to at-

Tend any meeting of the Board. (c) The head of any agency (other than any agency represented under section 1(b) hereof) to which the President from time to time assigns responsibilities for the implementation of national se- curity policies shall assign a representative

To serve on the Board when the Board is dealing with subjects bearing directly upon the 300 • OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS responsibilities of such head. Each such representative shall be an Under Secretary or corresponding official. Each such head may pro- vide for an alternate representative of his agency who shall attend

Any meeting of the Board, requiring representation of such agency, in lieu of the representative when the latter is, for reasons beyond his control, unable to attend. (d) Any alternate members of the Board serving under section 1(b) of this order, and any representative

Or alternate representa- tive serving under section 1( c ) of this order, shall, while so serv- ing, have in all respects the same status on the Board as the mem- bers of the Board provided for in section 1( b ) hereof. SECTION 2. The President having approved any

National security policy after receiving the advice of the National Security Council thereon, the Board shall (1) whenever the President shall here- after so direct, advise with the agencies concerned as to (a) their detailed operational planning responsibilities respecting such pol- icy, (b) the coordination of the interdepartmental

Aspects of the detailed operational plans developed by the agencies to carry out such policy, (c) the timely and coordinated execution of such pol- icy and plans, and (d) the execution of each security action or project so that it shall make its full contribution to the attainment of national security objectives and to the

Particular climate of opinion the United States is seeking to achieve in the world, and (2) initiate new proposals for action within the framework of na- tional security policies in response to opportunity and changes in the situation. The Board shall perform such other advisory func- tions as the President may assign to it and

Shall from time to time make reports to the National Security Council with respect to the carrying out of this order. SECTION 3. Subject to the provisions of section 101 (c) of the Na- tional Security Act of 1947, as amended (50 U.S.C. 402 (c)):

(a) (1) The Board shall have, within the staff of the National Security Council, such staff as may be necessary to assist the Board in the performance of its functions, (2) the said staff of the Board shall be headed by an executive officer of the Board, and (3)

Employees of agencies may, consonant with law, be detailed to the aforesaid staff of the Board. (b) Members of the staff of the Operations Coordinating Board provided for in Executive Order No. 10483, as amended, who are immediately prior to the taking effect of this order receiving com- pensation directly out of funds available

To the said Board shall be transferred to the staff of the Board referred to in paragraph (a) EXECUTIVE ORDER 1O7OO • 3O1 of this section as of the effective date of this order. The said trans- fers shall be accomplished in consonance with applicable law,

Including the last proviso of section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act of 1944, as amended (5 U.S.C. 861). (c) Appropriate arrangements may be made for the detail to the staff of the Board referred to in paragraph (a) of this section of employees of agencies who are immediately

Prior to the taking effect of the provisions of this order detailed to the staff of the Operations Coordinating Board provided for in Executive Order No. 10483, as amended. SECTION 4. As used herein, the word “agency” may be con- strued to mean any instrumentality of the executive branch of the

Government, including any executive department. SECTION 5. Nothing in this order shall be construed either to confer upon the Board any function with respect to internal secur- ity or to abrogate or restrict in any manner any function vested by law in, or assigned pursuant to law to, any

Agency or head of agency (including the Office of Defense Mobilization and the Director of the Office of Defense Mobilization). SECTION 6. The order supersedes Executive Order No. 10483 of September 2, 1953, and provisions amendatory thereof contained in other Executive orders (including, to the extent that it relates

To the Operations Coordinating Board provided for in Executive Order No. 10483, the proviso of section 303(b) of Executive Order No. 10610 of May 9, 1955). Subject to the provisions of this order (including the limitations imposed by section 3 hereof), the Board may be deemed to be a continuation of the Operations

Coordinating Board provided for in Executive Order No. 10483, as amended. SECTION 7. The foregoing provisions of this order shall become effective on July 1, 1957, except that if funds appropriated for the National Security Council shall not have become available on that date for the support of the Board in consonance

With this order, the said provisions shall become effective on such later date as funds $0 appropriated become so available. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER T HE WHITE HOUSE February 25,1957 DOCUMENT 2. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s testimony The National Security Council Jackson Subcommittee Papers on Policy-Making at the Presidential Level Edited by

Senator Henry M. Jackson FREDERICK A. PRAEGER, Publishers New York • Washington • London THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE • 227 tual concern to State and Defense, and these sessions are helpful in keeping officials of the two departments in close touch. When specific national security problems arise, they are often

Assigned for study and recommendation to interdepartmental task forces. The Defense Department is, without exception, repre- sented. There are frequent meetings in the Pentagon between the Joint Chiefs of Staff and representatives of the Department of State, at which topics on an agenda suggested by both departments

Are considered. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Interna- tional Security Affairs attends these meetings. The State Depart- ment is represented by the Deputy Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. However, these are the more formalized channels of communi- cations. There are innumerable, less formalized,

But no less impor- tant points of contact between State and Defense. Informal con- tacts, which facilitate the exchange and sifting of ideas at working levels, take place on a continuous day-to-day basis between oppo- site numbers in both departments. For example, representatives of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense

For International Security Affairs, who are most concerned with those military mat- ters involving foreign policy, work closely and harmoniously with their counterparts in the State Department. Regular meetings, also attended by representatives from other interested governmental agencies, are held to discuss matters of policy planning and opera- tions coordination, such as those which were

Formerly dealt with by the National Security Council Planning Board and Operations Coordinating Board structure. I must also bring you up to date on the State-Defense exchange program, in which this Subcommittee has expressed such a strong interest and which was discussed with you by Secretaries Herter and

Gates. The program is now well under way: a second group of exchange officers was welcomed by representatives of the two departments a few weeks ago. Under this program, Foreign Service officers are detailed to politico-military offices in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the service staffs, and the Joint

Staff; and military officers and Defense civilians serve tours of duty in various offices of the State Department. The exchange officers are not liaison officers or observers; they are full working staff members, or action officers, within the departments to which they are assigned. The program currently consists of eleven officers from each de-

Partment on loan to the other. Although it is still early for a defini- 226 • SELECTED TESTIMONY dividual or department the responsibility for preparing a plan in relation to a particular requirement. That individual to whom the task has been assigned is responsible for

Obtaining the views of others in the government who are affected by the plan. If he as- signs to me a responsibility for preparing a plan in relation to a certain situation, I recognize the interest of the State Department in that matter and solicit from Dean Rusk

His views on my plan. If he accepts the plan or if I accept his views and we therefore present to the President a unanimous position, it is so stated. If, on the other hand, his views differ from mine and I do not accept his views, I don’t try to find a common denominator

But rather I pre- sent to the President my recommendations and state that Mr. Rusk holds contrary views and they are these. The specific approach depends on the matter at hand. In certain instances, Mr. Rusk or I will call a group together, present a pro-

Posal, obtain their views, modify the initial proposal in relation to those views, come to an agreement in our own minds as to the course of action to be followed, and then put the matter under discussion in writing. Alternatively, if the matter is more complex

And requires more study, we may assign the task to one of our subordinates and ask that the other department participate formally in the discussion by assigning an individual to work with our subordinate—in effect, setting up a small task force which studies

The matter, presents in writing to Mr. Rusk and to me their recommendations, which we then either accept, reject, or modify. SENATOR JACKSON. YOU mentioned a task force. This administra- tion has made considerable use of task forces, both at the Presiden- tial level and within the departments. I wonder if you would com-

Ment on the role and operation of task forces from the standpoint of the Department of Defense. SECRETARY MCNAMARA. They are a very useful, effective way of approaching a complicated problem and insuring that people with a variety of interests and points of view and experience bring to bear their experience upon that problem and

Upon its solution. They are effective if they are properly directed, if they operate as a working group with a director and a responsible leader. They are not effective if they turn into a leaderless committee-type organiza- tion. Some of them do, in which case they

Prove to be worthless. SENATOR JACKSON. In other words, they can suffer from the fail- ings of any other committee, especially those you alluded to earlier. DOCUMENT 3. JK 516 A5- Cover page of Book V, and page 100 Reproduced by the Library of Congress, Congressional. Research Service. May 22, 1979. 100

September 7-—Rosselli tells Harvey the pills are still in Cuba. October 22-28—Cuban missile crisis. November—Operation MONGOOSE ends. 1963 Early 1963—William Harvey tells underworld figures the CIA is no longer interested in assassinating Castro. March 18—Attack on a Soviet vessel off the northern coast of Cuba

By members of Alpha 66, assisted by members of the Second National Front of Escambray reportedly occurs. March 26—Attack on a Soviet vessel by members of Commandos L-66, another anti-Castro group, reportedly occurs. April—Special Group discusses the contingency of Castro’s death. May-September—Lee Harvey Oswald moves to

New Orleans; be- comes involved with FPCC. He contacts anti-Castro Cubans as well. Mid 1963—Series of meetings among major leaders of the anti- Castro movement. June—Special Group decides to step up covert operations against Cuba. July 24—Ten Cuban exiles arrive in New Orleans from -Miami and join the draining camp” north of New Orleans.

This “training camp” is directed by the same individuals who were previously involved in procuring dynamite. “A”, a life-long friend of AMLASH, had helped procure the dynamite, Late July—Carlos Bringuier is requested to assist exiles at the “training camp” in returning to Miami July 31—The FBI seizes more than a ton of

Dynamite, 20 bomb cas- ings, napalm material and other devices at a home in the New Orleans area. Articles appear in the New Orleans Time Picayune on August 1, 2, and 4,1968. August 16—Chicago Sun Timet carries an article that reports CIA had dealings with the underworld figure Sam Giancana.

Helms informs McCone of the CIA operation involving Giancana, and tells him it involved assassination. August—According to TBI report, a Latin American military offi- cer attends a Cuban exile group meeting and talks of assassination. Early September—-Talks between the Cuban delegate to the United Nations, La Chuga, and a U.S. delegate, William

Atwood, are pro- posed by the Cubans. September 7—CIA ease officers, after their first meeting with AMLASH since prior to the October 1962 missile crisis, cable head- quarters that AMLASH is interested in attempting an “inside job” against Castro and is awaiting a U.S. plan of action.

Castro gives an impromptu, three-hour interview with AP reporter Daniel Harker. He warns that U.S. leaders aiding terrorist plans to eliminate Cuban leaders will themselves not be safe. September 12—Cuban Coordinating Committee meets to conduct a broad review of the U.S. Government’s Cuban contingency plans. They

Agree there is a strong likelihood that Castro would retaliate in some DOCUMENT 4. USAF Office of Special Investigations document FALSE DOCUMENT. The pages of what is called the “Briefing Document: 1. President Ford was groomed to become a leader years prior to becoming one by the New World Order.

2. The White House leaked some of the bad information about Vice-President Spiro Agnew.11 To be more precise, assets of the New World Order working close to Nixon leaked allegations of corruption and bribery. 3. Richard Nixon was put into office by the New World Order because they wanted him in office

In 1968, they did not want him in office in 1973-1974.12 (Nixon had been told that rather than 1960 he could be President in 1968 which he preferred knowing their plans for 1975-76.) When they wanted to arrange Nixon’s fall, they did not want Spiro Agnew to be in the line of sucession.

4. Alexander Haig, with strong ties to the New Order, the Rockefellers, and on the CFR, according to Agnew in Agnew’s book Go Quietly or Else, made veiled threats on Agnew’s life if he didn’t resign. 5. The New Order knew Agnew’s life story, and knew the Press could convince the public that

The allegations about Agnew were true (which they weren’t). He was selected for Nixon’s Vice- President, so that the New World Order could force him out of office, and install the Mason/Bilderberger Ford. 6. The Watergate Affair was intentionally created by the CIA and the Rockefellers. Read Gary Allen’s The Rockefeller File. The man who

Blew the whistle on the Watergate Breakin was a CIA agent James McCord.13 Other CIA agents were involved like Richard Ober, who was an important leaker of news to the press about Watergate. 14 7. The details of how Haig and Kissinger, CFR men, arranged for Nixon to be removed

Can be read in Epperson’s The Unseen Hand, pp.420-421. A recent book that is based on seven years research Silent Coup by Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin tells the story of how Richard Nixon was forced to resign through the help of a military spy ring. The book has new information about

Important people overlooked in the older versions of what happened. (The book is available through Liberty Library, 300 Independence Ave., SE Wash., D.C. 8. After Ford became President, he made Nelson Rockefeller his Vice-President. If the New World Order had wanted Rockefeller as President then Nelson could have been appointed Vice-

President rather than Ford, because they knew Nixon was going to fall. 9. A number of men in military intelligence are aware that a military coup took place that ousted Richard Nixon, because they heard orders that instructed military personnel to no longer take

Orders from the White House or “Top Hat” which was a code word for the White House. The interested person in this particular point should get Milton William Cooper’s book Behold A Pale Horse and read chapter 11.

There you have it, plenty of people with evidence that Nixon was given the hachet by the New World Order—by a military coup that the public hasn’t even known about. The minds of the Power are such, it is likely they never even cared what Nixon, the man they had put into the

White House, went through to see his reputation (which they had created) destroyed. Nixon wisely did not allow them to do to him what had happened to Forrestal. AN INTERRUPTION Why does the Sanhedrin of the Bilderbergers mess around with installing and deposing men like Richard Nixon, rather than just ruling

Themselves? Because they want happy slaves. Just like the Nazis with their pretend bath showers, they don’t want to rock the boat. They have to stay on plan. Their plans call for a step-by-step progression into the New World Order. The time is here, everything is in place to begin their New Slave State.

I have expected the reader to keep his courage up as he reads this—for those that want information on how to cope read chapter 3.10. They have never won, until you and I give up. The building of this One World Slave State

Will be done systematically. How many Jews resisted the Nazis? How many Poles resisted the Nazis? It was hard because things happened in a controlled step by step progression. Before the Jews were shipped, they were herded into Ghettos. (Yes—I believe Jews were killed, I don’t believe the exaggerated figures, but

I have seen too much evidence not to believe it happened.) What was there to stop the Nazis from carrying out what they had promised to do? And what is to stop the New World Order? Can they break your spirits?—only if you let them. Can they win? only when we the people give

Up and declare them victors. Can you survive? Did people survive W.W. II concentration camps? Did some people escape going to concentration camps? Enough pep talk. This chapter is to give the reader a feel for how the different components of the New Order are working together. CHARTS: Chart 1: Illuminati Objective-destroy all authority

Chart 2: Illuminati Objective-maintain illuminati authority Chart 3: Illuminati Objective-abolish family life & marriage Several charts have been provided to give an overview how the goals of the Illuminati, which have been known since the 18th century, have been carried out by the cooperation of a multitude of various Illuminati-controlled branches.

This may seem hair-brained that various components work together, but it is confirmed by witnesses(ex-participants) to this Author, and the Power’s own plans which have at various times been discovered. Further, the historical record upon close scrutiny backs it up. OPERATIONS RESEARCH TECHNICAL MANUAL TM-SW7905.1

During the first known meeting of the Bilderbergers (which was in 1954 at Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeck, Holland) a TOP SECRET Manual was presented to the Policy Committee as instructions on how to carry out their policies. This top secret manual was entitled: “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars An introductory programming manual Operations Research

Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1” Through various means copies of this manual have reached those of us trying to expose the New World Order. This manual spells out in detail their strategy to control the masses of people. This manual is usually quite technical. The manual is not intentionally derogatory toward the common

Person in order to insult him, because it was not intended that the common people would ever lay eyes upon the manual. The following excerpt taken from many pages into the manual represents their twisted view of us, and it also represents the manual’s author’s subconscious need in circular

Reasoning to validate their heartless program for us: “FACTOR VI—CATTLE Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.”

WHERE DOES ONE READ OF SIMILAR THINKING The idea of calling Christians (and all gentiles) cattle is very strong in the Talmud. The Hebrew acronym Akum in the Talmud (made up from the words Obhde Kokhabkim U Mazzaloth) is applied especially in Schulkhan Arukh to mean Christians. For instance, the word

Is applied to Christians in Orach Chaiim (113,8), and Iore Dea (148, 5, 12). In Kerithuth (6b p.78) it says in the Talmud: “The teachings of the Rabbis is: He who pours oil over a Goi [gentile], and over dead bodies is freed from punishment. This is true for

An animal because it is not a man. But how can it be said that by pouring oil over a Goi one is freed from punishment, since a Goi is also a man? But this is not true, for it is written: Ye are my flock, the flock of my pasture are men (Ezechiel,

24, 31) You are thus called men, but the Goim are not called men.” In Tract Makkoth (7b) one is not guilty of an accidental murder when trying to kill a Goi. A man is innocent of murder, “…if intending to kill an animal he kills a man by mistake, or

Intending to kill a Goi, he kills an Israelite.” In the Midrasch Talpioth (fol. 225d) and Orach Chaiim, 57,6a the Akum (the Christians) are said to differ only in form from beasts. The gentiles are called “cow and ass” in Zohar, II, (64b).

Rabbi Edels in his comments on Kethuboth (110b) states: “The Psalmist compares the Akum to the unclean beast in the woods.” The gentiles propogate like beasts. “The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like to that of a beast.”- -Sanhedrin (74b) Tosephoth. Because the gentiles are beasts the Talmud

Repeatedly says they are not capable of contracting marriages. See Kidduschim (68a), Eben Haezer (44,8), Zohar (II, 64b). Because Christians are so terrible, the Talmudic Jews are commanded not even to do anything good to Christians. “Those who do good to the Akum…will not rise from the dead.” Zohar (1,25b).

The reader gets the picture. The Talmud has very little positive to say about the gentiles. What throws off Gentile readers of the portions of the Talmud that are available for him to read, are that the Talmud has some lofty principles—the catch is that they are meant only for other

Men— and the Talmud is emphatically clear Gentiles are animals, and according to the Talmud these “animals” can not be sinned against. It is clear to this Author from studying the Rothschilds that they certainly have this view of the gentiles, and they have been nursing a hatred of gentile beasts for generations. (See chapter

3.3) This Author can’t say exactly what che Rockefellers’ views are. They are also Jewish, (for instance one newspaper talked about the Rockefellers going to their daughter’s Bat Mitzvah.) The Rockefellers have at times said things that indicate they don’t think much of the common person.

This Author suspects that if the powerful Jewish Bankers have made alliances with any Goyim in order to rule the world—the powerful Goyim are going to be double-crossed. ANIMALS On the farm I fed animals outdoors in horrendous weather, and on other occasions I cleaned

Out lots of manure. I have nursed sick animals and helped many calves be born. Yet, on the farm, I also castrated animals, tagged their ears, helped brand them, and butchered them when it was decided upon. This is what they intend to do to you and me.

In socialist Orwell’s book Animal Farm we learn what all their socialism will really boil down to—the maxim is found in Animal Farm—”All animals are equal, some are more equal than others.” When the elite’s Fabian Socialism is put in place it will be worse than Hitler’s socialism and Stalin’s socialism. This benevolent dictatorship

Will answer to no other power except God almighty. But just like when I held a bucket of grain in front of my sow to load her onto a truck to take her to her to a butcher, they offer you “incentives.”

Incentives-Why should you have a cashless society? It will mean no more trips to the bank, no robberies, fewer police, easier transactions, etc. Incentives-Why should you help exterminate Christians? They have a karmic debt to pay, and this is helping them pay off their debt. Incentives-Why should you have One-Super-Church?

In order to solve the problems of this hugh globe, to prove Christ’s message (some of the people saying this are Communists!), to end denominational bickering and narrowmindedness, etc. Why should the government take over the young children before age 5 ? This is the critical part of life, and parents are failing miserably.

Why should you think like cattle—that is follow the herd? Lucis Trust tells us, “Looking at the whole problem from another angle, it might be stated that the effort of the past has been to raise the consciousness of humanity through the pioneering efforts of its foremost sons. The effort of

The future will be to bring down into manifestation the consciousness of the soul through the pioneering efforts of certain groups. It has therefore, as you will readily understand, to be a group effort because the soul is group conscious and not individually conscious; the newer truths of

The Aquarian Age can only be grasped as a result of group endeavour.” (Emphasis in the original.) The New Age movement doesn’t want critical thinkers, people who think for themselves— because critical thinkers will realize all the garbage they are dishing out is not new, the ancient

Babylonians, Hindus and Egyptians were saying the same things. Further, analytical minds rather than “intuitive” minds will begin to put two and two together, they will realize what’s happening. ON AND ON AND ON I have read in their own material all their well thought out incentives.

They prefer not to tell us the bottom line, the fine print that means a NEW WORLD SLAVE STATE. They prefer not to tell you how they have carefully thought out how to cause many of the problems that they use to demand to limit our freedom in order to save us. When one reads

The detailed studies these people have done on what they are doing and plan to do, it blows one’s mind. They have many of the best minds in this country massaging their ideas, and researching and testing them. The public has no comprehension

How carefully thought out and detailed their plans are. Further they have set up organizations to perpetuate their power and plans to world domination over as long a period as it takes. They are in this for the long haul. It is designed that way. ARE WE CATTLE?

Even if we are, cattle can go through fences. I’m counting on you to be a person and not a cow. A horse thinks like a horse, and a cow like a cow. But a person, who can predict? Why don’t you surprise the New World Order Masters, or their proxies, and subordinates.

They have also left out one thing in their calculations and formulas. God Almighty. From Russia comes the report of a particular Russian lad who was drafted as they all are into the Russian army. The Company officers decided to torture him to get him to renounce his Christian faith. Finally, being unsucessful, they decided

To make an example of him by stripping him naked and placing him at attention outside during the Russian winter. They figured he’d freeze shortly. A miracle took place, an angel ministered to him, he didn’t freeze, and this all took place with

The company observing. Then the Russian army had a whole company of die hard believers to deal with. If you are one of those people who are shaking their heads at this story—then it is obvious you too have left out God in your calculations.

WHERE IS THE DANGER? At first before this book, to know about the separate parts of the Conspiracy may have meant no more to you than when a child watches a car’s battery and radiator hose to understand how a car moves. The scheme of how it works, the

Principles, and how the components work together need to be understood before staring at a distributor cap will make any sense as to its relationship to the rest of the car. Likewise, this book is putting it all together for you. This chapter was especially meant for that, although other

Chapters help in this too. THE SECOND TOWER OF BABEL At times it seems that those bringing in a New World Order releece in the being identified with the first Tower of Babel. The official poster of the Council of Europe, which represent the EC, portrays the EC as the Tower of Babel

Under construction.16 Twelve pentagrams (this Council of EC likes to use pentagrams often upside down) representing the 12 nations of the new United Europe are above the poster’s Tower of Babel. 17 This has been picked up by various magazines. Dave Hunt reports that a special insert in

The European Edition of the Wall Street Journal for the second quarter of 1990 carried an IBM ad showing the new United Europe as a Tower of Babel under construction. 18 In 1723, a poem was written in London entitled “The Freemasons; a Hudibrastic Poem. A

Couplet of it ran: “If history be not ancient fable Free Masons came from the Tower of Babel.” 18a If you have been helping build this Tower of Babel, and have read this far, I encourage you in the name of Jesus Christ your Savior, to

Lay aside your Masonic square and level, your Masonic plumb line, your trowel, your masonic mallet and chisel, your Masonic rules and lines and pick up the Word of God and free yourself of these great pillars that support a great new Tower of Babel dedicated to the religious enslavement of mankind.

Lockhead Aircraft Corp. advertises that its computers are designed to “combat the Babel effect” and to create global understanding again.19 Just as the freedom that they promise is slavery, the understanding they promise is confusion. Al Seckel, a physicist and molecular biologist who has edited two collections of the writings

Of Bertrand Russell makes these astute comments, “It appears as if I have entered the ‘Twilight Zone’ every time I talk with or read the literature of people associated with the New Age movement. Terms that have quite specific meanings are often carelessly bandied about with the result that the message is either gibberish

To someone who knows the proper usage of the terms or profound, esoteric, and sublime to those who do not…First, the use of technical jargon in a popular format, whether the words are contained in the dictionary or freshly coined, is meant to

Impress the reader. Second, the meanings of words are subtly changed as a way to intimidate people. It has become fashionable, for example, for those who advocate an unorthodox point of view to declare themselves ‘open-minded’.”20 Have you ever noticed that the “open-minded” believers of these “New Age” ideas righteously

Denounce anyone who disagrees with them as not having an open-mind? To like today’s rock music is open-minded, to like “elevator music” or gospel music is closed minded.21 The misappropriation of words has long been a stock tool of the various branches of the

Illuminati, because their intent has always been to misled. The supreme elevation of this is when it becomes official policy to use double-speak and double-think. If anyone thinks double-speak is something only out of Orwell’s 1984 or the future, they should read U.S. military and U.S.

Government literature. The double-speak is quite prevalent, especially pervasive within groups like the CIA. Bear in mind, these are the people governing us. JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES The Masonic goal was to get prayer, the pledge of allegiance, and religious trappings out of the public schools. In 1939, the composition

Of who sat on the Supreme Court was changing. The next few years would see many new appointees. The Mason F.D. Roosevelt was appointing Masons to the Supreme Court. When the Jehovah’s Witnesses began taking cases to the Supreme

Court in the late 30’s and early 40’s many of the Mason Supreme Court Justices were Masons. In order of their appointments, the following Masons were serving on the Supreme Court when the Jehovah’s Witnesses began winning court cases: Hugo L. Black (Mason) 1937-71 Stanley F. Reed (Mason) 1938-57

Felix Frankfurter (Jew with B’nai B’rith) 1939-1962 (while Jewish supreme court justice Louis D. Brandeis ended his term in ’39) William O. Douglas (Mason) 1939-1975 James F. Byrnes (Mason) 1941-42 Robert H. Jackson (Mason) 1941-54 Wiley B. Rutledge (Mason) 1943-49 This author has been told by one Mason how

Closely he watched each of these Jehovah’s Witness Supreme Court cases. This Author’s theory is that the Jehovah’s Witnesses were serving as the foot soldiers for the Masonic hierarchy’s ambitions. Most of the Supreme Court cases of significance during this period involved the Jehovah’s Witnesses. By 1955 they had won 40

Supreme Court victories. 21a An example of how the JWs repeatedly won is May 3, 1943 when the Supreme Court decided 12 out of 13 cases in their favor. 21b Roosevelt’s Attorney General Fracis Biddee was very liberal toward the Jehovah’s Witnesses. 21c . Rolf Svensson, researching at Shiloah, found

Out that their legal library had 20 large shelves filled with legal literature involving the Jehovah’s Witnesses. 22 The Jehovah’s Witnesses were instrumental in getting the vestiges of Christianity and acts of nationalism taken out of a number of countries’ schools. On June 14, 1943 the Supreme Court decided

In West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette that Witness children could not be expelled from public schools for refusing to salute the U.S. flag.22a Although the Jehovah’s Witnesses are out in the trenches winning battles against Christendom and Nationalism for the Masons, it appears that they are considered expendable. In contrast to

The Mormons who are advised to get the best education, and to have large families, the Jehovah’s Witnesses are advised not to get good educations23 and to consider not having children.24 The Mormons have an aggressive door-to-door campaign also, so it is not necessary to throw away the potential of the Jehovah’s Witness youth,

And to deny the JWs the privilege of enjoying family life, just to have an aggressive door-to-door campaign. The WT Society has chosen the dates 1914, 1925, 1975, 2000 as the dates for Armaggedon. This is interesting. The Masons had big plans for 1914, the creation of WW I, the Prieure de

Sion wanted to put one of the Black Nobility in power over a United Europe in 1914, but someone changed their plans. The Theosophical Society wanted to introduce the New Messiah in 1925-26 but that plan collapsed in embarrassment. The New World Order wanted to bring in

Their rule by 1976, and it was also announced far in advance that the New Age Subversive organizations announced they would do their work in the open after the key year of 1975. Things happened but not as big as they had planned and they put off many things. Finally now, the New

Agers, the Masons and others are pointing to the year 2,000 for the start of the New Age, and so is the WT Society. An example of numerous low key statements coming out of the Society is this quote from Awake! Nov. 8, 1986, pp. 7-8, “For the year 2000, I visualize a world transformed

Into a beautiful paradise! But I don’t think that either the present world or its rulers will live to see that day….We are living in the last days of the system of things.” WT -LDS LEADERSHIP COOPERATION Although confidential sources reveal that there is cooperation between the LDS top

Church leaders and the WT Society, it is very difficult to see any cooperation publicly. It would be nice in a way to be able to say on such and such a day Pres. So-and-so called Pres. So-and- so and here is the transcript of the discussion. Further, there is the difficulty that publicly

The Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses are enemies, which totally obscures the cooperation. We could expect a no-holds religious conflict going on between such zealous proselytizing groups. Several items are hints of what is going on at the top behind the scenes. Hints:

Item 1. Jehovah’s Witnesses have been given so little and such poor quality anti-Mormon material from headquarters that a typewritten manuscript of about 10 pages written by a JW not in the WT hierarchy has been circulating among the JW congregations in the Western States. It

Is rare that local JWs will dare write anything religious, that role is reserved for the WT Society. This Author has personally examined this JW Anti-Mormon paper. It is superficial and simplistic. That the JWs have to resort to it, underlies how little importance WT headquarters in

Brooklyn, NY have placed in converting Mormondom. item 2. C.T. Russell had a genial attitude toward Mormons. When the WT Society’s founder C.T. Russell stopped at Salt Lake City, UT he went to the Mormon Tabernacle for a service. His reaction to Utah, “It is our opinion that Mormons are as honest as others—more honest

Than many.” The tenor of his brief stay could hardly be labelled antagonistic.(WT Aug. 1, 1911, pp. 229-230 ; WTR p. 4861) item. 3. The WT Society speaks of a restoration of all true doctrine in the WT 8/15/1971 p. 503. The concept that there was a modern day restoration of true doctrine parallels Mormonism.

From these three little hints we could gather that the WT leadership is not as antagonistic toward Mormonism as we would expect, and that they both even share some common religious ideas. THE MORMONS The world’s largest computer is owned by the Mormons and has been placed in an

Underground facility ready to withstand even a nuclear war. And what is this computer used for? It stores all the family history information of the world. Although there certainly are gaps in the historical records, the Mormon church has done about as good a job as possible. They have gone

To every country in the world and photographed every conceivable genealogical record they can find. The Tract Sacred Temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints put out by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints states, “But there are uncounted millions who have walked the

Earth and who have never had the opportunity to hear the gospel. Shall they be denied blessings that are offered in the temples of the Church? Through living proxies who stand in behalf of the dead, the same ordinances available to the living are made available to those who have

Passed from mortality….This vicarious work constitutes an unprecedented labor of love on the part of the living in behalf of the dead. It makes necessary a vast undertaking of genealogical research to find and identify those who have gone before. To assist in this research, the Church coordinates a genealogical program

And maintains research facilities unmatched in all the world….This program…has been utilized by various nations as a safeguard of their own records.” 24a The Mormon people are told their chief religious duty is to do their own families’ genealogical charts. The Mormons also secretly have staffs of Mormon genealogists doing charts of people

In general who are not their own relatives. This secret program is called the “Named Extration Records Program”.24b The Mormons also get the public schools involved. Because the amount of work processing the world’s genealogical records is so immense the Mormon Church is quietly getting High School classes to help with the

Work. Public High School typing classes are being given records to type out as assignments. Although the Mormon people have been told this genealogical material is needed to baptize the dead, it is actually being compiled for Big Brother to control us when the New Order comes. The Mormon church has spent billions of dollars

On this project, and the Mormon people have been conned into spending untold millions upon millions of hours of volunteer work to get all these records in order. The LDS Mormon Church in Utah is the religion of Masonry under another name. The RLDS church may be infiltrated with Masons, but

It is not the religion of Masonry. That is why the Power has favored the LDS church over the RLDS church, and in part why the Reorganized church even though it has always had a more legitimate claim to authority and a more practical

Theology has never thrived. The Mormon temples are really just Masonic temples, and if their plans develop far enough we may live to see that fact openly declared. Its interesting that the LDS church was in favor of the RLDS’s first

Temple, the one built in Independence, MO. The Mormon church is being geared for survival. They are well prepared. It’s long been this Author’s opinion that in case of nuclear war, the religion that will prevail in the United States

After the war will be Mormonism. Why? Mormons are prepared to survive, and there are many Mormons in the government, CIA, FBI who will be earmarked for special government shelters. This Author has been in an underground government city, built to protect government people

In case of a nuclear war. It’s scary, the government has built itself multitudes of expensive shelters (some secret), and the people of the U.S. have been left basically to fend for themselves. Is that what it means to have a government “for the people”?

CHURCH UNIVERSAL & TRIUMPHANT This new-age church is there to recruit those who do get concerned with the kind of information that you are reading in this book. It then siphons off the public’s response against the System into this little cult. The church owns 33,000 acres in Park County

Just north of Yellowstone Park. On this land they have built an underground shelter capable of handling 756 people, and 45 smaller shelters capable of handling another 100 people. There are 3,000 of the church in that area, so mathematically they appear to be short of

Space. The main shelter consists of 6 interconnected 14′ x 200′ living areas. Trucks of weapons and ammunition were being delivered daily, according to county officials interviewed in Mar. 1990.25 C.U.T. member Mike Derkers interviewed during the construction of one of the nuclear bomb shelters stated, “We may seem paranoid, especially

With all the changes in Eastern Europe, but its pretty obvious that those changes are part of a hugh KGB smokescreen.” 26 THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH The Roman Catholic Church has provided much of the framework and manpower, etc. for the creation of a One-World-Religion. The Catholic church has been the major power behind the

Ecumenical movement, which has taken the Christian churches away from their doctrinal foundations. The Catholic Church has provided all kinds of help for the CIA. It was Catholic money which made Solidarity in Poland, which was their planned instrument to cause the “Iron curtain” to appear to dissolve. (Socialist governments

Are still intact in all the Eastern European communist countries, and leading communists still are in key positions.) The key Bilderbergers have veto power over who becomes the Pope. What is important about the Catholic church is its power and size. It is available for a wide range of scenarios, because of that power.

Some literature today pushes the idea that the Catholic church is the mastermind behind all these forces. Could it be the the Rothschilds, the Communists, the CIA are working for the Catholic church? When one becomes aware of details such as how much more powerful the Rothschilds are than the Vatican, of how the

Masons had trouble controlling Pope John Paul I and had to murder him, and how Prince Bernhard of the Black Nobility has veto power over who is elected Pope—these type of things show that the Catholic church is being controlled by an

Outside force more powerful than itself. The Catholic church is in alliance with these forces now, and most certainly is playing a big role in their plans. As with all of these groups there are three levels so-to-speak of participation. 1. conscious participation

2. bought into the philosophy, but unaware of the final end. Someone once said, they are fools living by their folly. That is not the wording this Author would use, but it does express the idea that they are wrapped up with their vain philosophies. 3. influenced by the Zeitgeist of it, people

In the social framework going with the flow. JEWISH GROUPS The Media (long controlled by Jewry) has so conditioned almost everyone, that I seriously wonder if it is of any value to attempt to undeceive people—even though I realize the facts are on my side. I could also quote people who

Were tops in their fields of expertise who can verify various things—but they typically have lost their jobs and have been ignored and are parriahs by Society for simply telling the truth. A historical view of things is essential to understand where the non-Christian Jewish groups

Are coming from. Of any group of people, history is very important to the Jewish people. They still remember that day sometime in the late 14th or early 13th century B.C. when the angel passed over their first-born. 33 centuries and they haven’t forgotten.

The concept of a Messiah is bound up in the traditions of the Jews like no other group. The Encyclopedia Judaica, p. 1416, in the art. “Messiah” explains that the Messiah is to be of the House of David, reign in Jerusalem, rebuild the Temple, and reinstitute the Temple sacrifices.

This is the official position of the state of Israel. Let us use a parable to discuss what has historically happened. There was a bride, but she found that she couldn’t be faithful. Occasionally she came back to her good husband, but being

Debauched she was unappreciative of him, and had trouble seeing his worth. Besides there were just too many attractive men around. She was so wrapped up in her adultery and debauchery for so long, that when her husband came to help her out of her problems, she didn’t even recognize

Her husband. She called the police and lied to them to destroy this man. She thought she had destroyed him through the police (but actually hadn’t). As a divorced woman, who had gotten rid of her man, she sought to replace her sugar-daddy. A new husband would remove her reproach

Of being a whorer. But she wants a husband that will be strong, one who is attractive and worthy of her worship, but lets her have her own way in everything. So far no groom has been able to

Met such a demand. The new man will have to hate her first husband with a passion like she does. Now the bride in the story is the Jewish nation. The good husband was the Lord. The new

Husband that she seeks for is the man of perdition that the Jews will worship, who will replace Christ the divorced husband. Christ, who was Messiah, tells the Jews “I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you

Will receive. “Jn 5:43 Simon the Magician was one of the false messiahs that arose, and interestingly Simon the Magician has some ties with those in Power today. But although Simon and many others—one author lists 25 false messiahs believed in by the Jews in the time period just after

Christ Jesus26a have come—none of those early false messiahs ever received much of a following. For the last few hundred years, the Hassidic leaders have been considered to be Messiahs by their followers. The Reformed Jews are now preaching that the Jews themselves are the Messiah—

They can save themselves, and so this philosophy lends itself comfortably with the way they are gaining a monopoly of power over the world. The Jews that examine the Talmud and Zohar see in these authorities the declarations that the gentile and Christian nations will be destroyed

In order for the Messiah to reign.27 Whether one believes in those passages of New Testament that speak of an Anti-Christ (cf. Rev 11:7; Rev 12 & 13; 2 Thes 2: 3,8) or not, it is possible to accept that certain elements of Judaism are strongly

Committed to a new messiah, and to boot a messiah that will be anti-christian. Thus we can recognize historically that the mission of Judaism is the dreadful mission of establishing the House of David as the world’s King/Priest Theocratic dictator.

This is the House of Solomon that the Masonic Lodge has hoped to rebuild. The book Holy Blood/Holy Grail called the world’s attention to the blood lines that claim to be of the House of David. This bloodline is extremely powerful now, and if given the opportunity, will set up

Their Anti-christian (read Anti-Christ) ruler. They have many candidates for the office. Public statements by leading Jews this century show their expectation to rule the world.28 Their strongest claim to Palestine is that Abraham’s children were promised it. God has allowed these people

Who with their false claims (the descendents of the Khazars) to take over the Holy Land. This is one indication for those who follow Scriptural prophecy to realize that these false “Children of Abraham” can not give us a real messiah.

Whoever rules the world will have to get Jewish approval. The Jews have always gravitated toward spheres of activity that gave them control. As this Author has researched who is in financial control of things, it is clear that a limited number of Jews are in control. Masons are

Placed in many important positions. Many researchers have talked about a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy. At first this Author approached the subject thinking that these people were racists and must be biased in their findings. And probably some were biased and racists. Unfortunately they

Were correct. The Jews do have a monopoly to run this country, and many other countries. And anyone can find that out if they are unbiased and willing to look at the facts. The B’nai B’rith and other Jewish groups have put out a stream of lies concerning this. The author of the

Book Octopus does an expose on the many lies the B’nai B’rith is guilty of as they unshamedly lie to cover up the extent of Jewish power. Perhaps there is no other way to than to just provide the reader with some names. You may have

Been told differently by the press. For instance, Clarence Dillon of Dillon Reed was born Clarence Lapowski, Dillon Reed. The Du Ponts are part Jewish- See Winkler, John H., The DuPont Dynasty, p.120. PARTIAL LIST OF POWERFUL U.S. JEWISH BANKERS THIS CENTURY: Julius Adler, Frank Altshul, Harold L. Bache,

Jules Semon Bache, Paul Baerwald, Edgar Sigmund Baruc, Edgar H. Bauman, Edwin M. Berolzheimer, Jacob Blaustein, Samuel Matthew Bomzon, Benj. J. Buttenweiser, Wm. B. Cardozo, Saul Cohn, Clarence Dillon, Victor Emmanuel, Max Epstein, Maurice Falk, Harold E. Foreman, S.H. Golden, Mendel Gottesman, Maurice Gusman, J.J. Hanauer, Rudolf Hecht, Adolph

Held, Walter E. Heller, Isaias Warren Hellman, John D. Hertz, David Melville Heyman, Sidney Hillman, Max L. Holtz, Henry R. Ickeheimer, Gilbert Wolff Kahn, Otto Kahn, David Kass, Robert Lee Kempner, Sigmund Klee, Arthur S. Kleeman, Henry H. Kohn, Philip Lehman, Herbert H. Lehman, Jacob Leichtman, Jerome Lewine,Sr., Walter Lichtenstein, Carl M. Loeb,

Howard Adler Loeb, M.J. Mandelbaum, Jacob Markel, Otto Marx, Dewitt Millhauser, Arthur J. Morris, Geo. Wash. Naumburg, Jacob Kiefer Newman, C.Y. Palitz, Eugene Hugo Paul, Hardwig Peres, Carl Howard Pforzheimer, George Pick, Jos Pulvermacher, Harold Chas. Richard, Chas. Richter, L.N. Rosenbaum, Louis F. Rothschild, Melville Nelson Rothschild, Alfred

H. Sachs, Walter E. Sachs, Jos. W. Salus, Karl Schenck, Henry Leo Schenk, John M. Schiff, Mortimer Schiff, Max J. Schneider, Eustace Seligman, Joseph Singer, Jos. Jacob Slonim, Phineas Sondheim, Herbert Teller Spiesberger, James Speyer, Fred M. Stein, David Becker Stern, William Stern, Robert Eli Strauss, Lewis L. Strauss, S.A. Telsey, Rufus M. Ullman, Clarence

E. Unterberg, the Rockefellers, Frederick M. Warburg, James Paul Warburg, Paul Felix Warburg, Paul M. Warburg, Maurice Wertheim, Sidney James Weinberg. These Powerful Jewish Bankers consistently seem to enjoy hiring or working with Freemasons. Although the Freemasons who are into Banking are not as powerful, and if they are gentiles are

In positions where they answer to Jewish bosses, it is interesting to see a partial list of Mason Bankers too. PARTIAL LIST OF MASONIC BANKERS/FINANCIERS (Some of whom are also Jewish) John S. Africa, John C. Ainsworth, Francisco P. Alvarado, William R. Angell, J. Hugo

Aronson, James P. Baxter, S. Clark Beise, Char. J. Bell, R. Livington Beeckman, Oliver H.P. Belmont, James G. Blaine, James Bruce, Augustus L. Chetlain, H. Earl Cook, William W. Corcoran, Will. C. Costello, Frank Craig, Daniel H. Crissinger, Arthur S. Crites, Ed. H.

Cunningham, Harry Darby, James E. Davidson, David W. Davis, Edwin L. Davis, James E. Day, Edward I. Edwards, Arthur B. Eisenhower, Louis L. Emmerson, Author H. Geissler, Albert G. Godall, William C. Gordon, Charles B. Hall, Louis B. Hanna, Maple T. Harl, Everett B. Harris, Overton Harris, Byrd E. Henderson, James F.

Hinkle, Marion S. Kennedy, Jr., R. Lee Lockwood, Phineas C. Lounsbury, Andrew W. Mellon, Richard B. Mellon, Edwin T. Meredith, Frank Phillips, Henry B. Qui -by, Charles N. Rix, Andrew W. Robertson, Frank H. Thompson, Frank M. Totton, John Wanamaker, William H. Wheat.

Whether it is business, commerce, the Federal Reserve, the Communist Party, the Auto/ Transportation Industry, Steel, Rubber, Diamonds, Communications, the Media, Liquor and Tobacco you will find Jewish leadership and control. Under them, but near the top of things you will find Masons. (See Appendix for a list

Of Jews in U.N. leadership positions in 1951. As you will notice the Jewish Zionists, who are but a small percentage of the earth’s population dominated the leadership of all areas of the United Nations.) If the Greeks were totally dominating all sectors of American life and publicly stating

They believed in a One-World-Government I would be exposing the Greeks in this section. I have no personal prejudice towards the Jews, I have defended them enough times. However, I would be liar not to tell you that the Jews with

The Masons control this nation. And I advocate forgiveness toward them when at some point, Lord Willing, the pendelum will swing, and people will want revenge. 1. Bailey, Alice. The Externalisation of the Hierarchy. NY: Lucis Pub. Co., 1957, pp.20-21. 2. Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln. The Messianic Legacy, p. 437. 3. ibid.

4. The nations that recognize the passports of the Order of Malta in one fashion or another include Belgium, France, Germany, Switzerland, Monoco, the Vatican, Austria, San Marino, Spain, Italy, Iran, Phillipines, Senegal, Haita, Ecuador, Peru, Lebanon, Chile, Dominican Republic, Columbia, Costa Rica, Liberia, Guatemala, Honduras, Cuba, Cameroon, Senegal,

Bolivia, Gabon, Uruguay. Casey, Douglas R. The International Man. Alexandria, VA: Alexandria House Books, 1981, p.28 5. Cooper, Milton William. Behold a Pale Horse. Sedona, AR: Light Technology Pub., 1991, p. 88. 6. Casey, op. cit., p.24 7. “Goodbye to Scandal” art. Parade Magazine (Mar. 23, 1980), p.6. 7a. Denslow, 10.000 Famous Freemasons. Vol.

2, p.323. 8. Epperson, A. Ralph. The Unseen Hand. p.207. 9. Prouty, L. Fletcher. The Secret Team, The CIA and Its Allies In Control of The World, p. 193 and other pages. 10. Read Prouty’s book The Secret Team. 11. Goldwater, Barry M. Goldwater. NY: Doubleday,

1988, p. 265,263. 12. Some of the particulars of this are explained in Epperson’s book The Unseen Hand, p. 415- 16. 13. Lasky, Victor. “Was the Watergate Break-In Sabotaged?”, Human Events. Feb. 2,1980, p.16. 14. Epperson referring to Deborah Davis’s research, p. 420. 15. Bailey. Externalisation of the Hierarchy, p. 30.

16. Hunt, Dave. Global Peace and the Rise of the Antichrist. Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1990, p.72. 17. Author’s observations. 18. Hunt, op. cit. 18a. Quoted in Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p.79. 19. ibid. 20. Art. “A New Age of Obfuscation and Manipulation” by Al Seckel in Not Neccessarily the New Age.

21. The only way this type of labeling seems appropriate to this Author, is if we understand open-minded as to be open-minded to demons. Then such labeling seems to have some validity. 21a. MacMillan, Faith on the March, p. 184. 21b. Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Divine Purpose.

WTB &TS, 1959, p. 208. 21c. MacMillan, op. cit., p. 185. 22. Cole, Murley. Triumphant Kingdom. NY: Criterion Books, 1957, p.168 22a. 319 U.S. 624 (1943) 23. Awake! 5/22/1969, p.15; Awake! 3/22/1985, pp.17-18. WT 4/15/86 pp. 28-30. What these articles declare is still in force. The Jehovah’s

Witnesses have a book especially for teenagers entitled Questions Young People Ask—Answers That Work. It’s conclusion is, “In view of these facts, many Christian youths have decided against a university education. Many have found that the training offered in congregations of Jehovah’s Witnesses— the weekly Theocratic Ministry School in particular—has given them a real

Edge in finding employment.” 24. This Author knows couples who gave up having children for the WT Society. The WT publication Children (1943) essentially forbid the JWs from having children. The policy eased up, but childlessness is still recommended. WT 3/1/88, pp.25-26. 24a. Sacred Temples of the Church of Jesus

Christ of Latter-Day Saints put out by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 1975, pp.8-9. 25. Spokane Chronicle, articles entitled “Church officials insist shelter only for war”, “3 teenagers run away to avoid shelter wait for nuclear war”, “Some go underground says Livingston official”,

And “War ‘drill’ sends sect underground.” These appeared Mar. 13, 15, 16, and 17, 1990 respectively. 26. Walter, Jess. “Cult moves divide community” art. in Spokane Chronicle. Spokane, WA (Mar. 18, 1990) p. A8:l. 26a.Lemann, Augustine. L’Ante’christ. Paris: Librarie Catholique Emmanuel Vitte, 1905, p.47; also Lemann, La Question du Messie, pp.22-24.

27. See Sanhedrin 98b, 99a—with Footnotes 1 & 2, 98b. Footnote 3 explains, “…it will be difficult to remove the Gentiles from their position without inflicting much suffering.” See also Sanh. 99a, and Footnotes 11 & 13. 28. Examples given in Israel: Our Duty…Our

Dilemma are Max Mandelstam, David Ben-Gurion, Rabbi Meir Kahane, Menachem Begin. See Pike, Theodore Winston. Israel Our Duty…Our Dilemma. Big Sky Press, 1984, pp. 198-199. Chapter 3.1 The New Money System H.G. Wells became a prophet. He felt his apocalyptic vision for mankind could be turned around if society would adopt his plans for

A Utopia run by a benevolent dictatorship. This benevolent dictatorship would largely rule through a public-spirited quasi- religious order of technicians who would “pander to all your worst instincts.”1 He refers to them as “an elite of intelligent religious-minded people.”2 However,religious in what way? A New

Religion based on Eastern mysticism. This “new religion” … would sweep away old institutions and usher in a new world order that would save the human race. “The conspiracy of modern religion against the established institutions of the world must be an open conspiracy…” H.G. Wells saw the religion of the New Order

As a less-secret form of Freemasonry. The video “Things to Come” made from the film based on his book The Shape of Things to Come is available for viewing from larger video stores. In the movie, a reference is made to “the science of Freemasonry.” Intelligent, often wealthy men who constituted a scientifically trained functional

Class with a global view would rule as a service-elite. Wells describes this, “In its more developed phases I seem to see the new republic as…a sort of outspoken secret society, with which even the prominent men of the ostensible state may be openly affiliated….The new republicans will constitute an informal and open freemasonry.” No wonder the Freemasons hail him as their

Prophet. Wells called this Masonic rulership “a cult of the world state” in The Salvaging of Civilization (1921) who would direct education and mass media propoganda.(See pp. 37-41) This group is similar to Plato’s Guardian e’lite corps in Plato’s Utopia. In a Fortnightly Review article in 1897, H.G. Wells challenged

The intellectuals and teachers who control the appartus of moral suggestion to UNITE and PROPOGATE a NEW WORLD FAITH, in the same year, he published “A story of the Days to Come” in which his Open Conspiracy was even more plainly foreshadowed. “…if religion is to develop unifying and

Directive power…it must adapt itself…Man’s soul is…part of a greater being which lived before he was born and will survive him. The idea of a survival of the definite individual…dissolves to nothing in this new view of immortality.” Well’s mentor was T.H. Huxley, who was Darwin’s good friend.

Not only was Wells an amusing talker with ideas, he had a real gift for thinking up and writing his plans for a New World Order in a way that people could enjoy reading them. His economic plans are highly regarded by the One-World-Conspiracy. A BRIEF LOOK AT WELL’S PLANS

In Well’s The Shape of Things to Come, p. 248 he envisioned a world run by Technologists (experts). Money would be done away with, and the medium of exchange would become “the unit of energy.” In A Modern Utopia, in his chapter on Utopian Economics, he

Envisions a world language and the world-wide freedom of sale and purchase. He writes, “book-keeping will naturally be done most conveniently in units of physical energy….Accounts between central and local governments could be kept in these terms. Moreover, one may imagine Utopian local authorities making

Contracts in which payment would be no longer in coinage upon the gold basis, but in notes good for so many thousands or millions of units of energy at one or other of the generating stations.”(p.83) H.G. Wells doubted that a thoroughly communistic Utopia could survive,(p.91) but a socialistic one that allowed individuality and

Individual initiative would. The new Utopia needs to provide for initiatiative.(pp. 92-3) Further, he writes in A Modern Utopia, “The World State in this ideal presents itself as the sole landowner of the earth. (p.93) It will lease land to companies and individuals.(p. 100) The State is to take most of a man’s inheritance.

Wells states in The New World Order “For in the world now all roads lead to socialism or social dissolution.” In the Open Conspiracy H.G. Wells (p. 89-91) warns of the problem racial discrimination will bring to a One-World-State. Further on page 133 he writes “…Big Business must carry Big Business into the Open Conspiracy…”

Back on page 30 he advises, “Religion, modern and disillusioned, has for its outward task to set itself to the control and direction of political, social and economic life, or admit itself a mere drug for easing discomfort….What are the necessary opening stages in

The synthesis of that effort…?” “What we work toward is synthesis, and this communal effort is the adventure of humanity.” 3 SETTING RELIGION “TO THE CONTROL AND DIRECTION” OF THE POWER In Well’s non-fictional works he repeatedly declares that everyday reality is the only reality we can know, and that our

Ideas about it are only approximations to the truth. 4 In the very opening address, when the Federal Council of Churches of Christ was formed Bishop Francis J. McConnell was exactly in line with H.G. Well’s definition of truth. “In the next place, the work of the federated movement of the

Churches is bringing a very remarkable intellectual gain. There is a certain kind of mocking question asked the church, “What is truth?” The Presbyterian Church say it is one thing, the Congregational another, the Episcopalian another and the Methodist another. We are coming to see very clearly in these days that we

Cannot define truth in abstract terms. We are coming to see, from the Christian standpoint, that truth is living. That is the absolute end in itself; everything else is instrumental.” 5 The Open Conspiracy with their foundations, their W.C.C., and their handpicked people running many religious institutions have

Set into place the controls to move religion where they want. An example of this is the Ford Foundations bankrolling of the Interreligious Peace Colloquim (later renamed Muslim Jewish Christian Conference) “founded in 1976 to bring together representatives of the world’s major faiths to discuss world

Economic and political issues.” (The Search For a New Economic Order, p.19) Two books resulted from these conferences World Faiths and the New World Order edited by Joseph Gremillion and William Ryan, and Food Energy and the Major Faiths by Joseph Grenillion. McGeorge Bundy of the Skull and Bones Order happened to

The President of the Ford Foundation when all this occured. The world’s religious leaders are getting involved in the economic aspects of the New World Order. It all sounds so benign. The parasite that has invested the world and is living off its productivity is very well camouflaged. This parasite of the superpowerful, may use

H.G. Well’s principles and plan, but they will reserve for themselves special power and privileges. They will abolish most inheritance like H.G. Wells suggested for the common people; (Well’s had some exceptions he thought were worthwhile), yet somehow will secretly have loop-holes for themselves. The pattern can already be

Seen. (By the way the concept of inheritance is a Godly principle established for Biblical Israel, so that people could care and provide for their children.) Even Wells doesn’t hide the fact that most of his suggested rulership will be same ones ruling today. In Clissold, the

Character William Clissold, of “Romer, Steinhart, and Crest”– a giant metallurgical concern modeled after another large corporation in his book After Democracy– belonged to the Industrialists that H.G. Wells always considered good material for the New Order’s leadership. Romer, Steinhart, and Crest were international, and by-

Passed governments to establish a new economic order, which would provide the foundation for political and social world order. This firm had countless manufacturing concerns running over national boundaries, and connections to international banking houses, and to many local industries for raw materials, machinery, skilled labor,

Capital, and markets. Clissold calls for an Open Conspiracy which “…is not a project to overthrow existing governments by insurrectionary attacks, but to supersede them by disregard….to make them neglible by replacing their functions.” An article by Wells two year later published in The Banker gives

The international bankers a big part in the Open Conspiracy. This was extraordinary that The Banker would print such a revolutionary article, but the truth is that H.G. Wells had Banker friends within the International Banking system. When we stop and think about it, what we are

Getting in the New World Order are the same International Bankers, the same Political leaders, the same Capitalists that have ruled us before. And by their own literature, one can read how poorly they have done for us. They have given us frequent economic distress,

Something in the neighborhood of 14,531 wars in the last 5,600 years of history, (with only 10 meagre years of true world peace). The difference seems to be like the Jehovah’s Witnesses description of what happened when Christ became King in 1914. The only thing that happened is that he changed chairs, changed one

Throne for another. If we consider their idea that Christ is a collective rulership the parallels increase. The difference between now and the future New Order is that they will openly be labeled an International rulership. They have been acting internationally for years. This is

Why Roosevelt gave Eastern Europe to Stalin at Yalta. So all they plan is a change of thrones, and to gain some more direct power. I can see how the same greedy, selfish, infallible powerful men are going to become the god-men H.G. Wells thought could save the

World, I fail to see how they can really bring salvation. We are being fed a rehash of what ancient Babylon had, which was by the way the ancient origin of and center of International Banking. POWER Again and again, power resurfaces as a primary

Motivation of those in control. Each of us enjoys the power to control events in our life–such as the ability to sleep, eat, or rest when we want. Each of us enjoys the power to take medicene to take care of what ails us. The beings that control us are power

Crazy. This is not my opinion alone, but the opinion of a Christian who happened by some holy accident to find himself rubbing shoulders with the elite. They have planned for a long time how to bring in a cashless society. The country of Singapore is a test

Case to lead the way for the rest of the world. Singapore has made money illegal and switch to computerized cards. The Power has had the technology, but they are slowly preparing us so that we will want what they want us to do. They will make it

Appear like a cashless society is such a great deal. No more trips to the bank. No more theft. Fewer police. No counterfeiting. (They won’t tell you what you will be actually giving up is one more freedom from their control.) Eventually, when people properly conditioned, they will take already existing technology to implant

Computer chips in our hands. The cashless society will seem like such a good deal, that unless Christians are fully committed to Christ, and are aware of the bigger picture, they will go along. Those that don’t will appear like sticks in the mud. They will appear

To oppose progress. The Christians in general have been going along with them every step of the way. It is hard to see what will wake the Christians up now. For instance, Social Security cards were initially they were never to be used for anything but Social Security.

They were to be secret, and not used for I.D. Then they became I.D. numbers. Then they modified the law to say one has to get a social security number and has to give the number if requested. The Amish wisely backed out of the Social Security program

When it became law. TECHNOLOGY TO ENSLAVE US The New World Order has been spending vast sums of money on creating the technology they need to control the world. Our tax dollars have financed many of the projects. The following are items that have already been tested and are simply waiting to be used on

The population in general. A. Human Transponder Tracking Device. The transponder which is attached to a person transmits signals by code to a network of electronic receivers. The receivers then relay the signal to computers. The transponders can not be removed without the computer knowing it. Satellites can be used to pick

Up the transponder signals. The system’s technology has been successfully used for about a decade on people out on bail or parole. In some counties a type of house arrest is maintained on individuals by the use of this device. B. Computerized Money Cards which contains a single chip

Microprocessor are already in use in several countries. The computer chip contain tens of thousands of transistors but is of a very small size. It can contain all the information about you, including your life history. These cards can also be made more secure by placing a computer readable voice print, and photograph

By a Face Scan camera. A computer will then match your voice with the voice print and the Face Scan picture with your face. C. Implantable chips which can be scanned by laser. This chips can be implanted under the skin of people, for instance in a person’s

Forehead or hand. Lasers can be used to read these, in the same manner that the stores read the bar codes. With the advent of large fast computers it is now possible to monitor the earth’s resources, the earth’s population, and the earth’s financial transactions. Financial transactions are increasingly being done electronically. Access

To the electronic system will be contingent on accepting the dictates of those who control the system. You are rapidly becoming a number or a series of numbers to the system. The centralizing of control of all aspects of the economy and life continues. In 1990, Ballot Measure 5 passed in Oregon

Throwing the whole state government, including Portland’s government’s services into a frantic effort to continue even basic services. Ballot Measure 5 was a tax revolt that slashed property taxes so deep, that Oregon schools lost $633 Million. Parks, schools and other services were possibly going to be eliminated.

Naturally, some people asked, “Who isn’t paying property taxes?” ■ “The Masons.” Due to the Masonic lodges’ overwhelming political power, many states have given special property tax exemptions to Masonic property. Other closely allied fraternities, like the Elks, share the same exemption, but the Lions Club in Oregon doesn’t because they

Don’t have a “lodge system” with “a ritualistic form of government” which is a criteria of the special exemption in Oregon. 1 The reason the Masons prefer a special exemption rather than an exemption as a non-profit charitable group is that their definition of “charitable” might not match the state’s. 2

Ex-Masons have criticized the Masonic system for spending more of the funds raised for charitable causes on themselves and parties than on the causes themselves. In Multnomah County, OR the lodges of various kinds have 72 tax-exempt properties that would contribute 1/4 million dollars in taxes each year.

The Masons have had their special exemption for half a century, and have successfully stiffled every attempt to change things. Even compromise bills that would only levy service fees on the Masons for police and fire protection given to their Temples and Lodges and

Other properties have been defeated. Ballot Measure 5 shows after it passed that the Masonic Lodge is concerned about itself more than public welfare. Even after Ballot Measure 5 passed, the Masonic Lodge showed no compassion on everybody else. They had no intention of pay

Their “share” of taxes. They continued to flood the legislatures with letters and pressure not to vote against their special exemptions in any way. These actions add weight to the critics who charge that the Masonic benevolence is simply window dressing, a cover for their other activities and a fail proof way to deflect

Any criticism. However, it is not our job to judge their motivation. Their may be some Freemasons who are very sincere in their motivation to give to benevolence. But what about this special tax exemption ? How should the Christian respond to that? Picture Jesus being asked that question. “Master, the Masonic

Lodge is getting special treatment, that other non-profit organizations don’t get. Should a Christian allow them to do this?” And Jesus would say, hand me a dollar bill. Who seal do you see on the dollar bill? Who emblem is this?” “The Masonic Lodges.” “You have spoken correctly. Render unto the Masons that which

Is the Masons.” 1. Information from Williamette Week, Vol. 17, No. 23 (Apr. 4- 10,1991) , p. 1, 8-10. 2. ibid. Chapter 3.2 INTEREST TAKING What you will learn: *That the Old Testament and New Testament forbid interest taking *Some of the role interest taking has played

For the New Order *Some ideas for Christ-like responses vs. the evil financial system set up today. In 1979, an articulate JW elder, who was an ex-Baptist minister, engaged this Author in conversation about religion, specifically the JWs version of it. This Author’s approach was to beat

Them at their own game, to outlegalize the legalizers. Having just self-published a book examining how both the NT and the OT Scriptures condemn interest taking, it was only natural that this Author would raise Interest as an issue. The idea behind showing the full brunt of the OT law, and Christ’s expectations for

Us, is that in showing how demanding the law is, one shows the need for grace. After all didn’t Christ say the law is a schoolmaster to lead us to Christ? For the next two years, this Author raised the issue of Interest taking and the lack of proper

Scriptural understanding about it to the Jehovah’s Witnesses. This Author had also mailed out free about 500 of my books on Interest taking to various addresses. Judging from the small amount of feedback, it wasn’t a hot topic. Today’s attitudes within Christendom toward interest are 180 degrees opposite of attitudes that

Have been held by essentially all Christians for most of Christendom’s history. Who could guess by looking at the Vatican Bank’s large assets (over 1 Billion in 1978) and their annual profit in 1978 of over 120 million dollars 1 that the Catholic Church forbid interest until 1830?

What does Christ think about all of the Vatican’s stock analysts, their computers following the economic markets, their world-wide banking interests and so forth? Today’s attitudes toward interest taking are so different from the past. And not only is that significant in itself, but there has been a wholesale memory loss about the evils of

Interest taking, undoubtedly facilitated by the One-World-Power’s control over the media and religious institutions of learning. The JW elders with whom this Author raised the issue were totally unaware of the strong scriptural indictments against Interest taking. The subject hadn’t surfaced until recently. Since this Author’s book, other Christians have

Begun to speak out against it. Apparently, the Lord has laid the issue on more than one heart. THE WT RESPONDS TO THE ISSUE “There’s the answer to your questions,” a JW said to me when the WT came out with articles

On interest taking in the Mar. 1, 1981 issue. They followed with another one in the Aug. 1, 1982 issue. It seemed far-fetched to think that this Author precipitated a response from the Towering Watchtower buildings in Brooklyn, but it wasn’t a subject that was being raised by anyone

Else as far as I knew. At any rate if it was a response, then it unwittingly did not help the WTs position with God Almighty. The scriptures condemned interest taking, but did leave one loophole; those, who the Israelites were authorized to kill and cleanse from the land, could be

Taken advantage of. It’s clear why the Society had to hedge on their own repudiation of interest taking, because the Society has been making money off of JW hardships. Their articles said that it is O.K. to charge interest for business deals, but not to take advantage of a brother’s need. Yet, the Society

When a group of JWs is too poor to raise a Kingdom Hall, encourages them to borrow money from the Society, and charges them interest.2 This is a direct contradiction of their own articles in ’81 and ’82. WHY WRITE ON INTEREST? A popular story is that if you want to boil

A frog, then put him in cold water and heat the water slowly. If you put the frog directly into hot water, he’ll jump out. Over the years, the Christians have been slowly cooked. How far have we come in the cooking

Process? We’re almost done. As the Scriptures warn, Unless those days are shortened faith will not survive. Is that an overstatement? Those readers who will bear reading this chapter will get a small sampling a how far we have come from the Scriptures. It is not likely that you

Will hear a sermon on such a topic in today’s churches. Ezekiel was commanded to warn both the righteous and the unrighteous (Ez. 3:17-21). With God’s help, I seek to declare the full counsel of God. Paul did this and was therefore free of their blood. Acts 20:27

Many sincere Christians receive interest, due to the lack of good scriptural teaching in these times. Wisdom and tact and patience are certainly needed in regards to correcting these dear Christians. It is up to God to judge their motives.(l Cor. 4:3-5) Interest-taking is only one financial weapon

Of the New World Order. Inflation is another weapon. Economist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Friedrich von Hayek noted, “Inflation is probably the most important single factor in the vicious cycle wherein one government action [increasing the money supply] makes more and more government control necessary.” Lenin

Felt that the best way to destroy capitalism is to debauch the currency. Germany’s horrible inflation was a big reason Hitler appealed to the German people. Coercive semi-secret business monopolies are another tool of the New World Order. The proposed worker I.D. card will be another way to control the masses. Only those approved

By them will be eligible to work. This chapter is not meant to imply that interest is their only financial weapon, but it certainly has been the primary means for the parasite to survive and control its host. This chapter is intended to pull the mask of acceptability

Off of interest, so that Christians can recognize that the basic livelihood of the International Bankers is contrary to Christian principles. These people in their pin-striped suits consider themselves screwd and superior to the masses; the Scriptures view them as evil. It is hoped that if any Bible-believing Jews read this, they will recognize how

Wrong these Internationalist Bankers are. The issue with interest is a moral issue. It’s not just that they loan money to Russia and Red China to build Socialism, it’s that they make their money in the first place from having a monopoly on the money supply, and acting as a parasite.

THE WORLD’S GOVERNMENTS ARE SLAVES TO INTEREST TAKERS The International Bankers have the nations in debt to them. We think of Japan as a rich nation, but the national government of Japan is deeply in debt to the bankers just like the U.S. government. Interest taking has been the life-blood

Of the One-World-Order paracite. They have convinced even the Christian people that interest is good. This chapter treats the same subject that chapter 3.10 is set up for, which subject is how to have a Christ-like response to the Conspiracy. This chapter deals with just one small issue,

Perhaps learning how far off Christianity is on just this issue, will stimulate Christians to investigate other financial issues. The New World Order has run roughshod over the U.S. Constitution and the Scriptures repeatedly, and is pressuring Christians into all kinds of compromises with their faith in Christ. Even though the President has suspended

The Constitution, he had sworn to uphold it, as did many other Constitutional traitors. Scripturally, the Christian has a duty to obey the Constitution first, before he obeys anyone who has broken their oath to uphold the Constitution in order to enslave you. The choice of what deserves obedience seems obvious, but many

Christians are choosing the later course. One way to deal with the Power is to be aligned with a superior moral power. The true Christian teachings have almost been destroyed by the Power on this subject. Unless these teachings are introduced, the Christian people will have no concept why we must come out from

Amongst their evil system, which is designed to promote evil. This is to help you know how to deal with them. WHY WRITE ON THE BIBLE? The authority of the Bible is not subtracted from when God uses men like Phillip to explain the Bible to men like the Ethiopean. (Acts

8) Sometimes, as with Peter and the people at Pentecost (Acts 2), and the three wise men in Jerusalem (Mt 2:1-8), the Scriptures can be made plainer by human words. No human can change God’s word, “For ever, O Lord, thy word is settled in heaven” (Ps

119:89) (cf. Jn 17:17, Ps.119:160, et al) The reader is encouraged to check God’s Word with diligence as the spiritually noble Bereans did (Acts 17:11). This is written to clarify the scriptures, and not to add to them. “HOW SHALL YE BELIEVE MY WORDS?” (JN 5:47)

Those desiring to understand this chapter are encouraged to equip themselves by being born- again and being in fellowship with the Lord their creator. “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know

Them, because they are spiritually discerned.” (1 Cor 2:14) See also 1 Cor 1:18, 1 Cor 1:25, & Jn 3:3. We must fear God: “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction.” (Prov 1:7) “Fear God and his commandments.” (Eccl 12:13) We must be willing

To do the will of God, “For if we sin willfully after that we have we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins.” (Heb 10:26) (cf. 2 Pt 2:21 & Jn 13:17)

We must be filled with the Holy Spirit who reveals all things, “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things,

Yea, the deep things of God.” (1 Cor. 2:9-10) “Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.” (1 Cor 2:13) “Be ye holy in all manner of life,” (1 Pt 1:4), apply thine heart unto instruction, and thine ears

To the words of knowledge,” (Prov 23:12), “The heart of the prudent getteth knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeketh knowledge.” (Prov. 18:15) “Study to show thyself approved unto God…rightly dividing the word of truth.” (2 Tim 2:15) FIVE O.T. SCRIPTURES FORBIDDING INTEREST TAKING

“If thou lend money to any of my people…thou shalt not be to him as an userer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.” Ex 22:25 “I pray you, let us cease this exacting of interest.” Neh 5:10 “he that by interest and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he (God) shall gather it for

Him that will pity the poor.” Prov 28:8 “And if thy brother hath become poor, and cannot support himself among you, then thou shalt relieve him, yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner, that he may live with thee. Take no

Interest from him, or increase, but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. Thou shalt not give him thy money upon interest, nor lend him thy food supplies for profit.” Lev 25:35-37 “Thou shalt not lend upon interest to thy brother.” Deut 23:19

LET US… “Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord; look unto the rock from which ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit from which ye are digged.” Is 51:1 When the Master’s sheep hear his voice they

Obey it. “He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar and the truth is not in him.” 1 Jn 2:4 “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” Jn 15:14 “We ought to obey God rather than men.” Acts 5:29

The Bible has no promises to those who obey Him only partly. When we know something is wrong and do it, it is sin. Look at examples in Biblical history —Nadab and Abihu (Lev 10:1,2), Saul (1 Sam 15), and Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11). Remember, “His commandments are

Not grieveous.” (1 Jn 5:3) “God resisteth the proud but giveth grace unto the humble.” Js 4:6 The scriptures repeatedly ask us to submit ourselves under God’s authority. By doing so we also come under his protection. That doesn’t mean we will not suffer— but

We will be protected as He knows we should be. This author knows of amazing miracles of protection, but each person needs to trust God himself, and learn for himself that the Lord is good. LEARNING THAT THE NT. ALSO CONDEMNS INTEREST A teacher who is hired by school to teach

A class, is a steward over the books she dispenses to her students. It would not be viewed lightly if she decided to make a profit for herself by charging her students money to use the schools books? The teacher can choose to some degree

How she uses those school books, but as a steward it is not her job to make a monetary profit from them. Likewise, but even more so, we are to put to good use the wealth that God has entrusted to our stewardships. In the same fashion that the teacher is aware of her stewardship,

The Christian realizes that what we use is “God’s money” not “ours”. (“The earth is the Lord’s and the fulness thereof…” Ps 24:1, it was intended that men be stewards of this planet. As it is today, our present government taxes the land, thereby taking

Advantage of the fact that everyone must have a place to live. Whether the taxes are paid directly by the owner, or indirectly through rental increases each of us is being taken advantage of. It was never intended that men would take advantage of other men this way.)

Our money and possessions are the Lord’s. “Those that believed were of one heart and of one soul; neither said any of them that any of the things which he possessed was his own.” Acts 4:32 “My Lord, O King, according to thy saying, I am thine, and all that I have.” 1 Kg 20:4

“The Lord is the portion of mine inheritance and of my cup; thou maintainest my lot.” Ps 16:5 The Lord “giveth food” Job 36:31 and “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father” Js 1:17 “God shall suppy all your needs.” Phil 4:19 Yet, “The

Lord gave and the Lord hath taken away, blessed be the name of the Lord.” Job 1:21 What should we do with God’s money? “Moreover, it is required in stewards that a man be found faithful.” 1 Cor 4:2 Render unto God the things that are God’s. “Freely ye have received, freely give”. Mt 10:8

Moreover “everyone shall give account of himself to God.” Rm 14:12 1. “But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” 1 Tim 5:8 “And having food and raiment let us

There with be content.” 1 Tim 6:8 2. “Do good to them that are of the household of faith.” Gal 6:10 3. “As ye have opportunity, do good unto all men.” Gal 6:10 “Give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven.” Mt 19;21, Mk 10:21, Lk 12:33, and Lk 18:22.

Jesus “spake many things to them in parables” Mt 13:3,13,34 21:1; Mk 3:23, 4:2,13,33; 12:1 “Why speakest thou unto them in parables?” Mt. 13:10 Those who do not understand the parables fulfill the prophecy of Isaiah 6:9,10 Jesus said. Mt 13:14 God’s people are to seek to understand the

Parables’ mysteries. Mt. 13:11 “Seek and ye shall find.” Mt 7:7, Lk 11:9 PARABLE OF THE UNJUST STEWARD LK 16:1-9 Jesus said, “There was a certain rich man, who had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.

And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? Give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest no longer be steward. Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? For my lord taketh away from me the

Stewardship. I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses. So he called every one of his lord’s debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How much owest

Thou unto my lord? And he said, an hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty. Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of

Wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore. And the lord commended the unjust steward because he had done wisely; for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends

By means of the money of unrighteousness, that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations. Here was a servant who faced judgment. His master was going to cast him out, fire him, and make him pay for his sins. This sevant then gave his master’s money (reduced

The wealthy man’s debtors’debts, and by that made friends) while he had a chance; and by doing so prepared a home for himself when he got his reward for poor stewardship. “And the Lord (Jesus) commended the unjust steward.” The Lord didn’t say the man was just and honest

(he called him “unjust”)—but he said he was wiser than the children of light. Why? What did the unjust steward do that many “Christians” don’t do? He gave freely while he had a chance, and he secured himself a future after his judgment. Do

We take our Master’s money and give freely? Are we prepared for the judgment? Verse 9 clearly explains the lesson of this story. We are to make ourselves friends by the money of unrighteousness by freely giving, so that when we fail (when we die), they (the heavenly host) may receive us into everlasting

Habitation (which is heaven). Verses 10 and 11 continue the idea that it is more blessed to give than to receive. He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much; and he that is unjust in the

Least is unjust also in much. If, therefore, ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous money, who will commit to your trust the true riches? And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man’s, who shall give you that which is your own? Dear reader, God’s word plainly tells you

That interest is wrong. It may be a small matter, but verses 10 and 11 tell us we must be faithful in the small things before we can be faithful in that which is great. Verse 11 warns us to be good stewards of wealth. The Pharisees and many Jews

Charged interest. They still do, and are called “covetous” (lovers of money) in Luke 16. “Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” Mt 6:24 and Lk 16:13 If people would obey God’s commandments, it wouldn’t be too likely they would have much money to be concerned about

Getting interest. “Work with your hands.” 1 Thes 4:11 Can you say with Isaiah 49:4 “my work (is) with my God?” “All that any man giveth of such unto the Lord shall be holy.” Lev 27:9 We cannot rob from the rich to give to the poor. Our money should be honestly earned.

LAY NOT UP FOR YOURSELVES TREASURES UPON EARTH (MT 6:19) This means just that. Get rid of your wealth! You may ask me, “How can you tell people that?” That is just exactly what Jesus told the young man to do to get to heaven—”sell what thou

Hast, and give to the poor.” (Mt 18:21, Mk 10:21, Lk 12:33; 18:22) LAY NOT UP FOR YOURSELVES TREASURES UPON EARTH. Do you have money saved up and put away? – -LAY NOT up for yourselves treasures upon earth. God told the Jews “Ye are cursed with a curse;

For ye have robbed me.” Mal 3:9 See also Mal 3:8, Ps 119:61 and Is 42:22. How can we rob God? Those who charge interest are robbers. “How canst thou say, I am?” Jer. 2:23 “Wherefore will ye plead with me? Ye all have transgressed

Against me, saith the Lord.” Jer 2:29 You have taken God’s money that was to be given freely to the poor. (Or in the case of the government, they have taken the land freely given to man, and are charging us for its use.) God gave you the chance with that money to purchase heavenly

Treasure and you went out and tried to make yourself richer. If you try to save your life and wealth you will lose it. (Mt 10:39,16:25, Mk 8:35, Lk 9:24) It’s ironic that the One-World-State plans to impoverish America— in allowing this God will simply be allowing for His law to be

Fulfilled. The judgment upon America is there in God’s word, and the instrument to enforce it may well be those who hate Him most. Their turn will come afterwards. Abraham Lincoln said that the sin of slavery was to be paid by American blood; what manner of payment will

We make for robbing God? It is quite possible that the future suffering we are to experience is to free us from that which hinders us from “setting our affections on things above.” Col 3:2 “Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath

Prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come.” 1 Cor 16:1-2 It says give as the Lord hath given you. If he gave you $5 more than you needed— thank Him for the chance to give it. “Cast your bread upon the waters.” Eccl 11:1 —symbolicly meaning don’t greatly concern

Yourself with the end result of those material things that sustain you, but in contrast it says don’t cast your pearls (heavenly treasure) away. What is holy do not give to the wicked people. Mt 7:6 For example, the temple of our body

Is holy, a virgin should not give this holy temple away to wickedness. The Holy Scriptures are holy-meaning set aside for God’s service- this message will only be “trampled upon” by the ungodly. It doesn’t say loan to the rich — but give to the poor. People with large bank accounts

Have been giving their money to the rich banks to use. The banks take that money and loan it out to needy people and make themselves richer through interest. Don’t help the rich get richer. Especially now that you are learning that the big rich banks are controlled by those

Rich men who intend to enslave the world under their New Order. Don’t save up for tomorrow like the foolish man in Lk 12:17-21. Don’t build bigger barns (if what you have is sufficient) and lay up wealth for your children to inherit. Give to the Lord. Think of all the wealth Christians lost when

The stock market crashed in 1929. The depression closed banks and made stocks and bonds worthless. When the One-World-Power monetizes the large debts and expenses of the U.S. government, there will be an exchange of one new dollar for two or ten of the old dollars. They have

Done this in third world countries, and have planned it for Canada and the United States. Do good while you have a chance. Use God’s money as he gives it. Act today, tomorrow never comes. “Go to the ant, you sluggard and observe her ways,”

(Prov 6:6) and fight evil with good TODAY. Do good while you have a chance. Use God’s money as He gives it. Don’t try keeping it like the foolish servant who said, “I went and hid thy talent in the earth; lo there thou hast that

Is thine.” Mt 25:24 Are the riches you were given in the earth (earthly things and the world)? “Thou wicked and slothful servant.” —Invest your money in heavenly treasure. “He who soweth sparingly will reap sparingly.” 2 Cor 9:6 If you

Do not sow God’s wealth to the poor, you will reap little wealth in heaven. This is not that every pay check you get must be spent immediately, but rather do not be afraid of giving to a good cause, just because you want to feel secure. Riches are no security. Jesus never begged,

But he did not always have ready cash, as is seen when the disciples got money from the fish’s mouth. Mt 17:27 One man who gave almost all he had, was asked about his generosity. He said, “Oh, I shovel into God’s bin, and he shovels back into mine, and he’s got a bigger shovel.”

Some will contend that we emphasize the moral law too much, and that grace and salvation should be preached. “What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had known sin but by the law; for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.” Rm

7:7 Yes, the law comes along and shows man what is sin. “Because the law worketh wrath; for where no law is, there is no transgression.” Rm 4:15 The law condemns man and points out his sin. But the law can not save him; the law will not cleanse a man. But the law drives

A man to the cross. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.” Gal 3:13 Sin still remains sin. “How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” Rm 6:2 “They that are after the spirit mind the things

Of the Spirit.” Rm 8:5 If God forbids interest, and you retain it, then you love interest more than God’s word. “He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be an abomination.” Prov 28:9

People try to make interest legal. They call it legal, because before they steal they tell the party how much they will steal, as though they stole according to what is fair. It might be lawful by man’s law, but there is a higher law. Making an occupation of it is no better than making

An occupation out of bribery and blackmail. “Love…seeketh not its own.” 1 Cor 13:5 But interest seeketh of others, therefore interest is far from love. “God is love.” 1 Jn 14:16 Therefore, interest is far from God. QUESTIONS?

Is this all new to you, the reader? Have you been taught that God wants you to be rich? Perhaps they quoted to you 1 Tim 6:18 “Instruct them to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share.” This is not

Speaking about accumulating wealth. Does good works mean money to you? Perhaps they quoted 2 Cor 9:8, “And God is able to make all grace abound to you, that always having all sufficiency in everything, you may have an abundance for every good deed.” This is

Not speaking about accumulating wealth. Does grace mean money to you? 2 Cor. 9:6 is the only scripture that give a legitimate motivation for bringing in excess money —not to accumulate it, but for giving it. “But this I say, He which soweth sparingly shall reap

Also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give, not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver.” So far this chapter has only scratched the surface of a large subject. Naturally, there

Will many questions, some by sincere truth seekers, some by those trying to find fault or loop holes in God’s financial principles for our finances. Some prefer for some misguided reasons to allow the One- World-State to do their financial planning and to allow themselves to be manipulated and jerked

Around, and ultimately enslaved. They are not aware that the One-World-Power which controls the Federal Reserve, the IRS, and the Bank of England, and much more, are designed not for benevolence but to control the world. This Author has personally witnessed the System mislead and enslave many farmers with farm

Loans that never should have been made. The Christian community is being rendered ineffective by the conspiracy by financial enslavement. Just having a covetous attitude can be self-enslaving. OUTLINE OF QUESTIONS Area One- Questions concerning the relevance of the O.T. teachings about Interest taking. 1. Are the scriptures in the OT on Interest

Irrelevant? 2. Was the law intended for just Israel? Area Two- Questions concerning Biblical teachings on interest. 1. Is there a difference between usuary and interest? 2. What does the world say in favor of interest? 3. What have Christians done in the past (before the Media was controlled by the wrong people) concerning interest?

4. Don’t people need incentive to pay off their loans, aren’t they spoiled by no interest? 5. What about inflation? 6. May we pay interest? 7. What is required of the userer by God and His church? 8. What would be the difference if I accept interest and give it to some needy cause or

Tell the debtor to do so? 9. If I loaned money to a man would it be wrong to accept interest if he insisted on giving it? 10. Are there times interest taking is O.K.? Area Three- Questions concerning Biblical teachings on rent.

1. Is rent the same as interest? 2. Was rent forbidden by the Law of Moses? 3. May a Christian rent and not sin? 4. Why would rent have been necessary when they had no taxes nor very little upkeep of fences or buildings? 5. If rent is not paid the property can sold,

But if the loan is not repaid then what is the security for the lender? 6. Can’t the poor be oppressed through rent? Area Four- Questions concerning lending and giving. 1. Are the Biblical provisions for the poor still in force?

2. Suppose we lend money to a needy person and he wastes it, are we responsible for that? 3. What are some of the duties of the borrower? 4. What is the secret teaching of giving? Area Five- Questions concerning my hermeneutics 1. How does the original Hebrew read concerning

Interest? 2. Is it lord or Lord in Lk 16:18? 3. Are the items in Neh 5:10, 11 rent or interest? ARE THE SCRIPTURES IN THE O.T. ON INTEREST IRRELEVANT? It is clear that Interest is against the moral teachings of Christ. Is that all the Christian can base

His actions on, or does the O.T. have relevance today? “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reprove, for correction, for instruction in the paths of righteousness”, 2 Tim 3:16 When Paul wrote this the

Only scriptures were the Old Testament. According to Mt 5:17-19 we realize that no one has the right to void one small commandment of the O.T., except that Christ teach us a greater way to fulfill the law. This writer believes that

The moral law is unchanged which true faith establishes. Rm 3:31 The law was everlasting. Does “everlasting” mean to stop at Malachi? The relationship of the law, morality and grace is examined in detail in the book Life In The Son. It shows without question that the Christian

Is called to live the moral laws. The subject is quite complex, because so many are not willing simply to accept the harder scriptures at face value. Let us remember that there is no Christian liberty outside of the truth, which is God’s word. “If ye continue in my word, then are

Ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Jn 8:31,32 Interest is forbidden by the moral teachings of the Old Testament, and New Testament scripture encourages us to follow these same moral teachings. WAS THE LAW (Torah) INTENDED FOR JUST ISRAEL?

The Apostle Paul’s opposition to the law was not actually opposition to the law per se, but rather to show men that salvation did not result from the observance of the law. There are numerous New Testament scriptures that indicate the Law was practiced by our supreme example

Jesus Christ (cf Sermon on the Mount), and also by Paul. But when one speaks of “the Law”, there are different meanings assigned to what it means. Moses received the Decalogue (what is called the Ten Commandments). He also received Priestly

Laws and the Covenant Code, plus a supplementary Covenant made at Horeb (Deut. 29:1). It is clear that moral laws of God were in operation long before these various Codes, Covenants, and laws were given. The first five books contain civil law, priestly law, and public law. Nor is each

Law exclusively in one category. It was recognized by all the early Christians that the moral laws of God should be followed by all men. What is not of faith is sin. The Christian is called to obey rules due to his faith and trust in His Creator. The original meaning of Torah, which is

“instruction”, applies today to the Torah. The laws concerning interest were not figurative nor civil law, clearly the warnings were of a moral nature. AREA ONE-QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE RELEVANCE OF THE O.T. TEACHINGS ABOUT INTEREST TAKING. The Old Testament teachings about Interest Taking are relevant for a number of reasons

For the Christian today. Let us summarize the values gained by obedience to our heavenly Father before presenting the Scriptural basis for these. * First the Scriptures are in agreement with Christ’s New Testament teaching. We remain under his protection by our obedience.

* Second, these scriptures still serve as instruction in righteousness for the Christian enabling the Christian to mature. *Third, a clear conscience is an inner freedom of spirit toward God that comes from knowing that God’s holiness is not offended. A correct attitude toward interest

May clear up a hidden barrier blocking that inner peace with God. * Fourth, the rejection of God’s standard quenches the Spirit, results in inner tension, and loss of spiritual direction. To follow God means to promote our health. The moral law is unchanged and is established

By true faith. Rm 3:31. Reading Mt 5:17-19 it can be observed that no one has a right to make void one small command of the O.T. except Christ, who was special in his own right. Because these guidelines are solid, we have a firm foundation that we can depend upon, this is

Ancient wisdom of the best kind. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in the paths of righteousness” 2 Tm 3:16 But some will ask is the law given against Interest in Ex 22:25, Deut 23:19-20, Lev 25:36-37 part of the moral law?

In view of the liberty the Israelites had to lend on interest to strangers, at first it seems that if it were morally wrong to take interest, why would this liberty be allowed? After all it isn’t morally right to commit adultery or to be drunk with strangers.

It is important to clear up exactly what strangers are meant here—for the Israelite’s heathen friends and their converts were to be exempt from interest (Deut 23:20); it was to the Israelites enemies, who they could kill—or at times were commanded to kill, that they could charge interest to. Interest appears to have been

Considered a kind of punishment, and other scriptures bear this out. “If thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I commend thee this day, that all these curses shall come

Upon thee, and overtake thee. He (the stranger) shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him: he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail.” Again we read, “And all these blessings shall

Come on thee and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God. The Lord shall open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in its season, and to bless all the work of thine hand;

And thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow.” It seems likely the blessing of lending and the curse of borrowing of these passages refers to loaning with interest. If it was or wasn’t doesn’t alter the fact, that God commanded them not to

Charge interest to his chosen people, converts to the faith, friends of the faith, but allowed them to loan with interest to those heathen enemies. In regards to what kind of law this was, note that the first three books of Moses are considered

To give the law, and Deut. is considered by some to repeat those laws. These three books mention twice about loaning to the poor, and once about to poor strangers. Why does the Holy Spirit twice say, “If thy brother be poor, thou shalt not lend on usury”

? (Usury in the King James Translation meant all interest.) Some will say that means the law was not universal, but limited to loaning to the poor, but that for business ventures it was O.K. But in Deut. it forbids usury (interest) to

Poor and rich alike. This is where an objection by some develops who see Deut. as only a repetition of the law. Some would claim that we must ignore any additions the prophets gave to Ex 20 because they were not law givers, but law

Interpreters; therefore, they assert these laws are intended for kindness to the poor, just as Deut 15: 1,2,3 and Deut 24:19,20,21. First, this ignores the tradition that Moses wrote Deut. Second, there is much more morally wrong with interest than just that it is unkind. However, kindness is a moral law and should

Be practiced too. If we have a chance to be kind in the manner of Deut 15 and 25, then let us do this. Bear in mind that interest is contrary to both the moral teachings of Christ and forbidden by the moral teachings of the law.

“At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release. And this is the manner of the release: every creditor who lendeth anything unto his neighbor shall release it, he shall not exact it of his neighbor, or of his brother, because it is called the Lord’s release. Of a foreignor

Thou mayest exact it again; but that which is thine with thy brother, thine hand shall release.” “When thou cuttest down thine harvest in the field, and hast forgotten a sheaf in the field, thou shalt not go again to fetch it, it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and

For the widow, that the Lord God may bless thee in all the work of thine hand.” (verses 20-22 forbid beating the olive tree over again, and gleaning grapes for a second time.)—No wonder the Jewish International Financiers will go to great lengths to destroy those who would hold the Bible’s teachings dear.

Can a Christian go after a forgotten sheaf in the field? May those who take clothes as a pledge for money lent, wait until the sun goes down to return them (Ex 22:26)? Can a Christian hold a debtor 8 years to a debt? Can a Christian obey one law of kindness and not another?

Can we deny Christians the liberty of breaking Deut 15:1,2,3 and Deut 24:19,20,21? Are we guilty of forbidding interest, a law of kindness, and ignoring the other laws of kindness? Have “Christians” been playing church, or have they been learning to walk in God’s spirit, and not after the lust of

The flesh? (cf. Gal 5:16) AREA TWO 1. Is there a difference between usury and interest? Today, the words have different meanings, however originally usury meant all interest. Generally, usury is used today to mean an exorbant or illegal rate of interest. When the shift in public attitude came toward interest, the

Word usury which was used to mean any interest changed to its new meaning of an exorbant rate. However, in scripture, and also in the nation of Israel there was no distinction between acceptable and unacceptable rates of interest, it was all considered to be extortion (Ps 109), and

The extortioner was considered to be a robber. 1 Cor 6:10 2. What does the world say in favor of interest? First, as Christians let us remember, “If anyone teaches otherwise and does not consent to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is

According to godliness, he is proud, knowing nothing, but is obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain. From such withdraw yourself.” (emphasis added) 1 Tim 6:3-5.

When worldly Christians or people in the world begin defending interest they often try to muddle the issues. They like to make the issues seem complicated. They also to try to show that interest taking has benefits. Let’s take a glance at this last item, that interest taking has benefits. They say the

Lender takes risks, so interest encourages loans. All ventures have risks, who can ascertain the future even on the safety of crossing the street? Does this mean I deserve to be paid for crossing? The risks taken by a usurer loaning to a company are

Far different than the company’s and its pardners’ risks who must take their lumps on whether the business prospers or fails. And the loss of their property, or goods remains ever present. That the usurer is in a way risking his money is true, but it is a totally different risk than the

Company and its pardners are experiencing. Further, if risk is a criteria for receiving extra money, every person even remotely connected to the business venture can claim some compensation. The families of the company, the janitors, and the neighbors all have a risk of some kind. That

Is the crux of the matter. The usurer supposes he deserves to be congratulated and honored for his risk taking. But the honest farmer, or the honest carpenter take risks everyday without compensation not supposing that their risks are special above everyone else’s. No one pays the farmer

For taking a risk when he plants his seeds, so that we can eat. No one pays the carpenter for taking a risk when he begins a house not knowing absolutely if a fire or strong wind might not damage it during construction. The carpenter takes this risk that we might have shelter. Risk

Entitles us to nothing. If it did we should all have a claim on riches. But the world will shudder, “Loans are necessary and who wants to loan if they are given interest?” In a sense, our sinful economy does need sinful interest taking to function. The

Pornography market needs more lewd photographs to continue selling books. However, many economies including the modern Moslem economy are (or have) functioning fine without interest taking. It is only to be expected that the world will shudder, but then they shudder to think of a world without sin. To live without cigarettes,

Booze, wild women, etc. seems incomprehensible to them also. This author is not concerned that by getting very technical and indepth in the issue of interest taking God’s word might contradict itself. God’s will for us is not inconsistent. His pronouncements against Interest are not inconsistent

With His best wishes for our lives. The problem with getting indepth is that this Author’s approach is based on the scripture’s value system, and that what the worldly Christian must realize is that what he might call benefits in God’s eyes are a shame. For instance, it will

Be argued that trade is encouraged by interest. That interest helps trade does not add merit to interest, for most trade today is conducted unchrist-like. Does our trade glorify God or man? Trade can go on without interest. The old Hebrew nation and many others have managed without.

If we get sucked into the complicated theories about interest a person can get really confused. The world has their financial gurus that are argueing, studying and contradicting each other as to how interest functions upon an economy. We are not to let ourselves be spoiled by philosophy

(Col. 2:8). They would have us believe the economy regulates interest rates and borrowing, and they see all kinds of “benefits” of interest. In simple terms, interest allows people to spend more than their limits, and brings many to ruin. Sometimes, as Christians we give the thief

Our coat and our hat besides our wallet to show him that God loves him. Interest is robbery and perhaps we may need to experience it for God’s glory, but that does not mean robbery is O.K. What would you replace lending on interest with? Won’t people who will be ruined by

Borrowing, be ruined whether they took interest or not? Couldn’t hard feeling arise if a man lending freely is injured for the need of money that was promised to be repaid, but wasn’t? Isn’t money lent longer when interest is charged and wouldn’t the shorter period of freely loaned

Money be a hardship? People can injure themselves with about anything. The Christian applies God’s principles and the dynamics of those principles work toward success. First, we are commanded to lend where we do not expect to receive again—Lk 6:35. The borrower is instructed to be “Not slothful in

Business”—Rm 12:11 and 2 Thes 3. The borrower is plainly instructed not to live off of others unnecessarily. We are all commanded to honestly work with our hands. If we suffer for having righteously loaned money for a need, the Scripture’s value system esteems such suffering. If that

Seems cruel to the world—they should recall all the suffering they have encouraged people to go through, it is an honor in the world to suffer through the Iron Man Triathalon (talk about pain), it was the in thing for worldly women to wear painful corsets and whale-bone girdles

To force their bodies into painful unnatural shapes, unless one gets wasted with alcohal and suffers a hangover he is not cool at parties,… the list could go on of the many ways the world expects their people to suffer. So understand that

For us to suffer for our God is our glory. If we give money so that a person can be slothful and waste it, we show poor stewardship, because we do not want to encourage that person’s sin of slothfulness. (Some misunderstand and think that not charging interest is carelessness.

Satan would have us overly careful lest we lose some of our abundance—yet that abundance was given us so that we could share.) The question is not whether we might suffer without charging interest, but what is the morally correct thing

To do. That is the question. That money freely lent has its faults is no secret. The underlying principle is to do what is most loving toward God, and one’s fellow man. The focus of interest is self. How would the world today survive without interest?— How would it survive without soldiers

To fight wars? What if this? What if that? Let us not worry about something the Scripture says will not happen. We know that evil along with its “bloodsucking usurers” are not going to all stop their bloodsucking just because you and I do, nor will the world self-destruct from

Lack of interest taking. But so what if it did? Why should the Christians be disturbed if the One-World- Order feel apart? These “if” questions are vain— but perhaps it may console the sincere seeker to know that the modern Moslem world has done

Very well without interest taking. Medieval Europe was often without interest and did fine. The natives of the Americas and Australia did fine without interest. And it is conceivable that the New Heavens and New Earth will be able to do just fine without interest.

As it stands today, interest takers have a vested interest in people being in need. If interest were not allowed the interest takers would develop more concern to see others sufficiently prosper. Doesn’t Mt 25:14-24 teach interest is right? We can use the Master’s money to get worldly

Or heavenly treasure, it’s your decision. You can use it selfishly or give it to Christ, it’s your decision. God provides us with a surplus, so that we can use it to glorify Him, and so we might enjoy the blessings from giving. Isn’t a man worth $1,500 who loans $100 to

A neighbor worth $1,500 losing more than the one borrowing gains? No. It is true though that the value of money can fluctuate—there is nothing wrong with repaying according to the real value of the paper one has borrowed. To say “you

Loaned me x amount of purchasing power and I will pay back x amount of purchasing power,” is not interest. This is due to the fact that the paper we call money is not real money, but the alchemy of the Satanic financial Power. Yes, the occult does create gold out of paper and lends

It out to nations and individuals on interest. (See chap. 3.3 to learn how the international bankers are a satan worshipping clique.) And then to avoid the effect of the Satanic alchemists and their inflation people try to use the interest-rates (extortion-rates) to profit from inflation. They justify their interest in extortion by

Claiming they are merely “protecting” themselves from inflation. If they simply want to protect themselves they should buy real money, i.e. gold, silver and real wealth i.e. land, houses, and tools; rather than stealing from someone through interest. Aren’t you trying to turn the world upside down? True Christians, like Paul was (Acts 17:6),

Will be accused of this, because they are trying to turn it right side up. When the Power makes Christianity illegal, will we have enough Christianity to be convicted? I hope so. 3. What have Christians done in the past (before the Media was controlled by the wrong people) concerning interest?

We should not rest our faith on the actions of men, but rather “let God be true, but every man a liar.” Rm 3:4 Still, many will be interested in the past. EARLY CHURCH FATHERS Barnabas, known from many scriptures concerning him in Acts, Corinthians and Galatians,

Wrote against interest (usury). He also wrote “Thou shalt labor with thy hands to give to the poor that thy sins may be forgiven.”1 Clement, who also worked with Paul (see Phil.) wrote in praise of the Old Testament for its

Humanity in forbidding interest. He said, “indeed the man who is generous to the poor receives sufficient usury in gratitude, praise and honor of his fellowman.” 2 Barnabas’ writings were considered scripture in Alexandria for about a century, and Clements’ writings were considered scripture for two

Centuries by the early Christians. The Christian Hermes also wrote against interest. An early writing which some say Hermas wrote says, “They that receive without a real need, shall give an account for it: but he that gives shall be innocent; for he has fulfilled his duty as he received it from God.” 3

Tertullian (c.155-220 A.D.) wrote against Interest. He wrote that Lk 6:35 means the same as Ez. 18:8. Remember that Ez. 18:8 refers to interest as evil and Lk. 6:35 refers to lending without hoping for anything in return. For Tertullian’s references to the evil of interest see this

Footnote.4 St. Cyprian (205-258 A.D.) and St. Apolonius of Hierapolis (who wrote in 175-176 A.D.) also wrote against interest. Cyprian wrote in 248 or 249 A.D. “Non faenerabis fratri tuo usurum pecuniae et usuram ciborum”—”We must not practice interest.” 5 In the 5th and 6th centuries we have the writings

Of many religious leaders who completely condemn the taking of any kind of interest. 6 The Catholic church banned interest until 1830. Augustine in his City of God, Bk. III, chapt. 17 related how the worst measure of oppression in the Roman Empire during the Punic wars of all the many oppressive measures was “The

People overwhelmed…most of all by usury…” The Anabaptist churches although they disagreed with the Catholic church over many issues, saw eye to eye with the Catholics concerning interest taking. Only in recent times have many of them lost the teaching that interest is evil. One of the first important assemblies of Christians

After the Apostles was the Council of Nicene. This Council forbid usury (interest) to the clergy with these words, “Whoever of the clergy, for filty Lucres sake, exerciseth Usury, let him be Disposed.” 7 The 44th of the Apostolic Canons and the 1st Council of Aries (314 A.D.) prohibited it in the same way.

The reformers Menno Simons, Martin Luther and Zwingli were agreed on one thing. They all condemned interest. Martin Luther-“When money is lent and a charge made or more taken back than was originally made over, that is usury, and as such is condemned by every law…nor can they

(interest takers) be saved unless they do penance”8 “the devil invented it,” and anyone who charges interest is “a thief, robber and murderer.” 9 “Rents are but the ‘fig leaves’ behind which usury hides its shame”.10 “Money is an unfruitful

Commodity which I cannot sell in such a way as to entitle me to a profit.” 11 “Will not interest soon be the ruin of the world?” 12 Luther felt Luke 6:34 commands us to follow the Old Testament teachings against usury.13 He also felt that

The trading companies, and bankers, and merchants revealed such a “bottomless pit of avarive and wrong-doing that there is nothing that can be discussed with a good conscience.”14 “How can there be anything good in trade?” 15 Menno Simons-“But in all things, one toward another, long-suffering, friendly, peaceable, ever

Ready in true Christian love to serve one’s neighbor in all things possible: by exhortation, by reproof, by comforting, by assisting, by counseling, with deed and with possessions.”16 “We beg of you from the bottom of our hearts, for Jesus’ sake, to reflect a moment whether your spirit is

One with the Lord’s Spirit, and your conviction agrees with His holy Word; whether it is the Spirit of the Lord and the love for your neighbor or the thirst for gain and the thought of temporal support that send and drive you into your profession. Do you preach God’s Word

Out of a pure heart without falsification; administer His sacrements correctly, and lead a pious and irreproachable life as the Scriptures teach; and do you verily shun and expel from the fellowship of the Lord, public transgressors, primpers, drunkards, LOVERS OF GAIN, USURERS, liars, swindlers, contentious persons, brawlers, adulterers, such as follow after prostitutes, blasphemers,

Those who take oaths, unrighteous people, etc.?” 17 (Emphasis added) Even the Catholic and Church of England preachers at this time warned of the evils of the merchants and their commercial schemes.18 John Calvin (born as Jean Cauin of Noyons, France) studied Humanism indepth and was associated with those Humanistic reformers

In France that wanted to reform Christianity with humanism.19 Calvin in his Commentary on Isaiah, 24:2 states, “No public government can be lasting without the transactions of commerce.” Calvin’s upper-class heritage, the importance of Geneva as a commercial center, Calvin’s deep association with humanism, and his possible Jewish heritage (His name Cohen also written

Couin) are all factors that could have contributed to his understanding that commerce was spiritually good. One encyclopedia states “Calvin blessed the Jews.” 20 Even though Calvin wasn’t so radical to accept all interest, he opened the door. Calvin in his Commentary on Exodus, 22:25 declared that interest could be permitted

To the rich. He thought interest takers were shameful (Comm. on Ps. 15:5) and that a well-ordered community would not tolerate interest takers to live in their communities. (Comm. on Ezek., 18:5-9). However, though he condemned interest to the poor, he opened the door to it for

Those who weren’t poor. In his sermon on Deut., 23:8-20 he expressed that the interest should be moderate, and never allowed within the Christian fellowship. Calvin had a very good attitude toward wealth, he states “God mixes up the rich and poor so that they may meet together and

Hold fellowship with each other so that the poor receive and the rich give.” 21 There has been debate whether Calvin opened the door to Capitalism or not. It is clear from Calvin’s sermons and commentaries he did not intend to support Capitalism. Troeltsch suggests that the ethic of

Calvin was “a door into which capitalism was able to steal.”22 It seems the proof is in the pudding. Geneva and Switzerland developed into banking centers. The Reformed religion, which spread through those areas of Europe caught between the rival Catholic and Protestant areas, has shown a remarkable interest in commerce and

Capitalism. Calvin’s influence carried over into the Puritan capitalistic work ethic of New England. An abundance of capitalists came out of Calvinistic backgrounds. The door was let open a squeek, and through that door rushed a horde of characters that sought

Power. Along with that lust for power came the desire to kill the one authority that stood in their way of world domination—faith in the Creator and his Word. It’s interesting to note Pres. John Adams in 1819 stated, “Banks have done more injury to the religion, morality, tranquility,

Prosperity and even wealth of the nation than they can have done or ever will do good.” Whether Adams knew it or not, it is probable that the War of 1812 was manufactured to prove to the nation that the U.S. needed a central national bank. During the war the bank, now

Known as Citibank and now controlled by the Rothschilds, raised over a million dollars in loans for the War of 1812.23 Pressure to re-charter a National Bank came as soon as the War of 1812 began, especially from two Americans who were vocal proponents of the War of 1812, the Mason Henry

Clay and John C. Calhoun. Harvard President Joseph Willard saw the war as the working of the Illuminati. 24 History records that Jewish Banker and jeweller Piccolo Tigre was an early member of the Illuminati. 25 Some of the Jewish banking family of the Rothschilds have been too.

NOTES 1. The Genuine Epistles of the Apostolic Fathers, trans, by Wake, George Rontledge and Son, Ltd., London, 1893. 2. Il Stromatum, 1.2, c. 18, Migne, P.G. t. 8, cols. 1023-6. 3. Wake, trans., op. cit. 4. Tertullian. Adversus Marcionem, Lib. IV, c. 17, Mig ne, Patrologia Lat., t. 2. and De Lapsis,

C. 6 Mig ne, P.L., t. 4 cols. 470-1. 5. Hartel, W., S. Thasci Caecili Cyprian, Opera Omnia (Corpus Scriptomm Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum III, i-iii) Vienna, 1868-1871, p. 153 1. 16. 6. Divine, Thomas F. Interest. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette Univ. Press, 1959. 7. Jones, David. A Discourse upon Usury, or

Lending money for increase. Printed by Samuel Crouch, Cornwall, Eng.,1692. 8. Luther, Martin. Werke. Erlangen ed.,XXIII, p. 283. 9. Luther, Martin. An den Christlichen Adel, Werke, Erlangen ed., VI, p. 466. 10. Luther, Martin. Sermon on Usury, 1519. 11. Luther, Martin. Tischreden, 1542. 12. Luther, Martin. Werke, Erlangen ed., XXIII, p.294

13. ibid., vol. XIII, p. 319. 14. ibid., vol. 45, p.270 15. ibid., vol. 45, pp. 246-7 16. Bender, Harold, ed., The Complete Writings of Menno Simons. Herald Press, Scottsdate, Pa., 1974, p. 146. 17. ibid., p. 537 18. See Blench, J.W. Preaching in England, Oxford, 1964, pp. 133, 244, 270 and M. MacLure’s

St. Paul’s Cross Sermons 1534-1642, Toronto, 1958, p. 123. 19. cf. Bieler, A. The Social Humanism of Calvin. Richmond, 1964, p.51 and also cf. Wallace, Ronald S. Calvin, Geneva, and the Reformation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1988, pp. 5-7. 20. As quoted by Mullins, The Curse of Canaan,

P.81. 21. Calvin, Sermon on Deut., 15:11-15, CO., 27:342. 22. Troeltsch, E. The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, vol. 2, London, 1931, pp. 644- 5, 915. 23. Sampson, Antony. The Money Lenders. NY: Penguin Books, 1981, p. 57. 24. Epperson, A. Ralph. The Unseen Hand. Tucson,

AR.: Publius Press, p. 133. 25. Mullins, World Order, p. 206. QUESTION 4. Don’t people need incentive to pay off their loans, aren’t they spoiled by no interest? The nation of Israel was directed by God not to be slothful—note for instance the proverb

Calling them to learn from the industry of the ants. If not having to pay interest makes people slothful, then God gave a command that was harmful. However, the scriptures against interest are forbidding it out of the principles of love and

Kindness. Jesus indirectly confirms this by stating that on love hang all the law given to Israel. Mt 22:40 The prophets of Israel (meaning their messages) were also according to Christ sent to Israel out of love. The prophets condemned interest taking.

If people are observing scripture by not taking interest, then they must also deal with Rm 12:11 “Not slothful in business” and 2 Thes 3. QUESTION 5. What about inflation? In 1929, $100 would have bought a good dairy

Cow. Five years later $100 would have bought 3 or 4 cows. This was a case of money gaining in value. Locking someone into anykind of a fixed interest arrangement can not be justified on the basis of inflation, unless someone knows for a fact what the future will bring.

It would be possible to peg the repayment of a loan on the purchasing power borrowed rather than a monetary amount. This would not constitute interest, and would actually be the most ethical type of repayment. Unfortunately, the U.S. government under the control of the World-Order allowed the

International Power to issue Fed. reserve notes contrary to the U.S. Constitution. When the Constitution was written it was plain that a monetary system on an honest medium of exchange- -silver, gold, etc. clearly was in the best interest of the nation. Christians are best off, if they can

Find alternatives to being in the system’s perverted financial system. As Christians discover better methods than working through the One-World-Power’s banking/financial theft system, some of these issues will take care of themselves. As much as possible the Christians should keep Christ’s money among the Brethren, as

The world can not be trusted to use it for God’s glory. Receiving interest from the world, encourages lending to the world rather than keeping the money within the Brethren. Should we not take care of our own needy first? Gal 6:10, 1 Tim. 5:4, 8,16. All of us who are keeping money within the

Banking system are helping prop up one of the biggest evil powers the New World Order has. QUESTION 6 May we pay interest? Jer 15:10 “I have neither lent on interest, nor men have lent to me on interest, yet every one of them curse me.”

The receiver of interest makes a giver of interest- he makes a thief. Where there are no buyers there are no sellers. Where there are not bribe givers, no bribe takers. But what if it is a necessity? the Bible has some strange cases of necessity. Adam’s sons married sisters, David ate the shew bread

(1 Sam 21:6), and the disciples healed on the Sabbath (Lk. 13:10). In Gen 21:32, Abraham received an unlawful oath. Abraham made a covenant with Abimelech and swore by God. Abimelech swore by the false Gods. Laban swore in Gen. 31:53 by the God of Abraham, the God of Nahor, the God of their

Father. Ur, city of the Chaldees worshipped Nanna the moon god and had this idol in their homes. This father was a Chaldean. Was this an oath to the gods? Anyway Jacob swore by the fear of his father, Isaac, which was the Lord

Yahweh. Why the difference in oaths? Did Abraham receive unlawful oaths and not sin? Didn’t Christ show it is lawful to suffer injury by paying tribute in Mt 17:29? Doesn’t the Scripture of Isa 24:2 “And it shall be…as with the taker of usury, so

With the giver to him.” mean we may not pay interest? No, the verse actually says this, “Behold, the Lord maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof. And it shall be,

As with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress, as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the

Borrower; as with the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him.” These verses tell the greatness and universality of the ruin and judgment on these people. If this verse means paying of usury is evil, then we must also rediculously say anyone who is a priest, servant, maid,

Master, buyer, seller, lender, or borrower is also evil. God wasn’t judging men for wanting to be priests or pay usury, but for not worshipping him as obedient servants. “This I pray, that your love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgment

(Phil 1:9) Isa 24:2 does not condemn paying interest. However, neither does it allow paying interest. “If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.” (Jn 7:17) the man who gives himself 100 percent up to living and

Finding truth will understand that interest is the same as robbery and extortion, and paying interest should not be intentionally done. Sometimes, we are taken advantage of unawares. A man may allow himself to be robbed, but we are guilty of the crime if we encourage, tempt, or help

The robber (or interest taker). We should not lean unto our own understanding. Many of us would not have thought Abraham should have accepted an oath to a strange god. Our understanding would have been different than God’s. God’s desire in our lives is not impossible to discover. Pray the

Situation through, keep praying until you know his will. “If you want to know God, love him.” 1 Cor 8:13 Otherwise I believe, “he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.” As Naaman in 2 Kg 5:18, I would also say “neither

Do or do not. I will not condemn thee- but if thy conscience condemn thee then do not.” QUESTION 7 What is required of the userer by God and his church. In referring to church our meaning is that of the Bible’s where those Christians within a certain

City were of one church. In other words a local body, where the person regularly fellowships. Interest is a work of the flesh and should be treated the same as “adultery, fornication, uncleaness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkeness, reveling and the like.” Gal 5:19-21.

Sins should be confessed to God (Lk 15:18) and proper restitution (Lk 19:8 and others) and repentance done. (Acts 19:19, Lk 18:6, Job 42:6, Rev 2:5, Hos 14:4 and others) Unfortunately, few who charge interest understand how God looks at it. “They know not what they do.”(Lk 23:24) And most people living

By it will want to defend it; people who don’t live by it won’t defend it, just as the silversmiths and the Image of Ephesus. (Acts 19:25) Will you plead for Baal? (Judges 6:31) The Bible warns usurers, “thou hast taken usury (interest) and increase, and thou hast

Greedily gained of thy neighbors by extortion, and hast forgotten me, saith the Lord God. Behold, therefore, I have smitten mine hand at thy dishonest gain which thou hast made, and at thy blood which hast been in the midst of thee.” (Ez 22:12-13) “The wealth of the sinner is laid

Up for the just.” (Prov 13:22) It appears then that usurers shall receive two payments. 1. the first of money, 2. the second of judgment. So repent sinner and make restitution. Don’t be like Samuel who ask, “Whose goods did I take?” (See 1 Samuel 12:3); but be like Zacheus.

“And Zacheus stood, and said unto the Lord, Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken anything from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold. And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house.” Lk 19:8-9 Restore it

Sinner, for the sin is not remitted until the money is restored. Amaziah in 2 Chr 25:9 did not know what he would do when he gave a hundred talents of silver. “And the man of God answered, The

Lord is able to give thee much more than this.” The interest taker (usurer) is out of fellowship with the Lord until this sin is fixed. He has no communion with Christ nor with the saints. Not only has he stolen, but he must not try

To pass this money which is not rightly his onto his children, rather “Set thy things in order before you die.” Isaiah said to Hezekiah. (Is 38:6) So sinner, if Christ is in your heart and speaks to you as Zacheus, then restore now as Zacheus

Did. QUESTION 9 If I loaned money to a man would it be wrong to accept interest if he insisted on giving it? There is a difference between accepting interest and demanding it. The best way to avoid the

Attending evils of interest is not to accept it, but encourage the debtor to give it to a worthy cause. This would be preferable, over accepting it oneself, if one is to avoid encouraging evil. Interest is a practice leading to the oppression of the poor. If the situation seems to be

A special case, then the best answer is to put the issue before the Lord. I have myself had best results if I cleared my slate with the Lord first. I believe at times the Lord doesn’t answer, simply because the plain answer is in his Word. Be honest

With the Lord. QUESTION 10. Are there times interest taking is O.K.? Area Three- Questions concerning Biblical teachings on rent. QUESTION 1. Is rent the same as interest? Obviously, rent is not the same as interest. The very fact that the two words can be used

Without any problem of the mind confusing the two ideas shows that they are not the same idea. “Should rent be viewed the same as interest?” is a deeper question. Unfortunately, our modern Bible translations have confused the issue greatly. The modern Bible translations have attempted

To put scripture in terms we can understand. In doing so they have given us words we understand, but that are not faithful to the original meaning. For instance, the parable of Jesus which occurs in Mt 21:33-41, Mk 12: 1-9 and Lk 20:9-16

In modern translations appears to be a rental situation, when it was actually a SHARECROPPING ARRANGEMENT in the original language and the parable shows this. In fact, all the Biblical examples of “rent” which the modern translations present (with the exception of Paul renting a room in Rome (Acts

28:30) are not really examples of rent at all. Ex 22:15 speaks of loaning an animal, Deut 24:15 indicates work for wages, and Lev 25:15-16 refers to a buyer paying for a share of the crops. The question remains is rent forbidden or not? Although rent was not part of the life

Of ancient Israel, and is not the optimum method for a Godly Society to operate under, it is not expressly forbidden. It is this Author’s conviction that rent is different from interest and can be paid. Rent inherently suffers from some of the same defects of interest and in an ideal situation would be

Have to be eliminated. Because we do not live in an ideal situation, and we are not expressly forbidden, rent is permissible. A major difference between the Israelites and the modern man is that modern governments in effect believe they own all the land, and in effect “rent”

The land to its citizens. If you do not believe this try missing your rent payments (taxes) and see if the government doesn’t come for what they think is theirs. In contrast to this ungodly system the Israelites were given the land for their families for an enduring inheritance. It genuinely belonged

To the people, rather than their government, although the final title holder was always God who held the people responsible for their treatment of the land. God will again someday bring to ruin those ruining the earth, according to various scriptures. How can we honestly quibble about

Rent, when in effect that is what all “property owners” are doing today? This Author does not wish to say that it is always right to charge or accept rent, but that although there may be some similarity between rent and interest, there are also some big

Differences. For instance, the owner who rents his property, but pays the taxes and maintenance, etc., but receives no rent would be better off financially, if he didn’t own the property. This would not be the case where money is loaned and no interest received. What if money was loaned and not returned?

It would be a total loss, while if no rent was received couldn’t the property be sold? In some cases the property could be sold, while in other cases it may be the owner’s home where he is unable to farm it himself. Thus to never allow rent could cause hardship.

The man that could use property tax free and upkeep free – that is free of charge – has a better chance than if he would own the property. In contrast, the man who borrows $5000 without interest is not better off than someone who owns $5000.

Again rent and interest are not alike. This does not give us any overall rule, circumstances vary in case to case, but it does indicate that the rules applying to interest do not have blanket application to rent. The poor can be oppressed as severely by rent

As interest. Some mining companies and other companies around the world have oppressed people to the point of actually keeping them in slavery to the companies by the use of rent. Rent originally served as a system of tribute, a tax in ancient times. It is clear that rent has

Its own harsh effects, but it must be examined in the context of being rent, and not as a type of interest. QUESTION 2. Was rent forbidden by the Law of Moses? After clarifying that rent is not interest, we then can ask, is rent forbidden by the Law of Moses? Yes and No.

The origin of the word rent is helpful. Rent comes from the Latin “rendere”. Rendere could mean either a payment or the surrender of a city to an army. In the word “sur-rend-er” the rend comes from “rendere”. The connotation has historically been a type of tribute or tax payment.

Although to demand this type of payment might not be acceptable under the admonitions to love others, the scriptures do not categorically forbid rent, or taxes, or tributes. Certainly tributes, taxes and rents can and should be paid according to Christ’s teachings. Whether Rent should be charged depends upon the exact situation.

Again much of what we might offhand refer to as rent can or is actually something else. QUESTION 3. May a Christian rent and not sin? This question and question 2 are really extentions of question 1 and are being answered in the

Context of the answer to question 1. If you haven’t read the last two questions please do. QUESTION 4. Why would rent have been necessary when they had no taxes nor very little upkeep of fences or buildings?

QUESTION 5. If rent is not paid the property can sold, but if the loan is not repaid then what is the security for the lender? QUESTION 6. Can’t the poor be oppressed through rent? Area Four- Questions concerning lending and giving. QUESTION 1. Are the Biblical provisions for the poor still in force?

QUESTION 2. Suppose we lend money to a needy person and he wastes it, are we responsible for that? QUESTION 3. What are some of the duties of the borrower? QUESTION 4. What is the secret teaching of giving? One of the reasons Christ’s and the scripture’s

Teachings on giving are being lost is that “The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” 1 Cor 2:14 “But God hath

Chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise.” 1 Cor 1:27 God’s secret formula of success is to give abundantly, freely, wisely, cheerfully, humbly, and secretly—for which He sees in secret and He richly rewards you in return in secret. As one man

Has often been quoted, “I shovel into God’s bin, and He shovels back into mine, and He has a bigger shovel.” St. Cyprian, bishop of the church at Carthage, was one of the first Christian leaders. His writings condemn interest taking. His writings were very interesting to read, because they

Emphasized alms giving to an extent that is rarely if ever heard today. In chapter 2 and 3 of his writings he brings out in scriptures in a way that is not taught today how important it is to give

Alms to cleanse ourselves of the sins we commit as Christians. In chapter 4 he brings out how if we do not here the needs of those around us, then we can not expect our prayer life to be fruitful. In chapter 6 he brings out that Tabitha’s almsgiving had qualified her to

Be raised from the dead. In chapter 7, he brings out that we must be faithful with unrighteous mammon, if we are to expect God to commit to us true riches, (cf. Lk 16:11) Chapter 9 through 13 are to encourage Christians not to fear about giving too much, and their resources failing them.

In chapter 18 he advises those who have many children in their homes with stretched budgets to give much because in doing so they cover the multitude of sins that come from a multitude of family members. The reader is encouraged to

Read St. Cyrprians writings for a more indepth study of the power of and the need for giving alms. Area Five- Questions concerning my hermeneutics QUESTION 1. How does the original Hebrew read concerning interest? The following are Hebrew words meaning to take interest.

1. “masah”. “masah” comes from “nasah” (verb) and signifies in “qual” to take or demand interest. 2. “nesak”. “nesak” comes from “nasak” (verb) which means to bite to oppress, to take interest. A picture of the pain of interest to the borrower is inherent in the word. The word “nasah” which

Meant interest taker has been translated extortioner in various scriptures. It was understood in the early church that the N.T. greek references to extortioners were applicable to interest takers. 3. “lavah”. “lavah” signifies in “qual” to borrow and “hif’il” to lend. 4. “marbit and tarbit”. from “rabah” (meaning

To increase or to multiply) comes two other names for interest “marbit” and “tarbit” (which also means a surplus or increase). The equivalent word in ancient Mesopotamia “Sibtu” which meant increase, carried with it a negative connotation meaning increase by attack such as an attack by pirates, or an attack of epilepsy. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES

Ex. 22:25 “If thou lend (lavah) money to any of my people who is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer (noseh – meaning extortioner), neither shalt thou lay upon him usury (nesek).” Lev. 25:35-38 “And if thy brother who dwelleth by thee be waxen poor, and fallen in decay

With thee [meaning he cannot support himself among you], then thou shalt relieve him, yea, though he be a stranger (ger), or a sojourner, that he may live with thee. Take no usury (nesek) from him or increase (tarebit), but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. Thou shalt

Not give him thy money upon usury (nesek), nor lend him thy victuals (food supplies) for increase (marebit – meaning fruits or profits). In Deut. 23:19-21 the word usury (nesek) meaning interest is used five times. The word for stranger (nokri meaning foreignor) appears once.

David complains of his enemies in Ps 109 and asks God to allow them to reap evil. Ps 109:11, “Let the extortioner (nasah) catch all that he hath; and let the strangers spoil his labour…because he persecuted the poor and needy man” (other resons are also given here in Ps 109:16).

Ps 15 says “Lord, who shall abide in thy tabernacle? Who shall dwell in the holy hill?…He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taking reward of the innocent.” Studying this seems to indicate that David believed taking interest came under the moral law.

Sir. 29:1-3 (Apoc.) reads “extortioner and an oppressor to devour (nasak)”. This and Ps 109:11 are two verses where “nasak” was translated extortion rather than interest. It appears from the original Hebrew usage that all interest was considered to be a form of extortion. Ezek. 22:12 speaks of interest takers and

Extortioners in the same sentence, and Mt 23:25 says the Pharisees are hypocrites being “full of extortion and excess.” Lk 18:11, I Cor. 5:10, 5:11, 6:10 are scriptures condemning extortioners. Amos 2 tells how the garments used as legal instruments for securing a debt and the wine

Of those who had been fined had been taken. The wine seized from fines must refer to a payment in kind taken from debtors. Whether this was according to the law illegal interest or not, it is clear that it produced suffering of the poor which disobeys Ex 23:6; 22:22,26.

QUESTION 2. Is it lord or Lord in Lk 16:18? Is it “Lord” or “lord” in Lk 16:8? Some will contend that I have added something to the scriptures, because English Bibles have a small “1” for “lord” in Luke 16:18. Does verse 8 refer to the rich man and not to the Lord

Jesus? Actually, they are the ones who are adding to the scriptures. No distinction like this is found in the Greek manuscripts nor in the German translations. The Greek manuscripts said “kurios” for Lord in Luke 16:8. This word is used in almost every

Place translated where they mean the Lord our God, or Lord Jesus. Greek words like “lord” or “father” were not set apart with capitalization. The observant reader will be correct that this kurios could mean either Lord or lord. However, three things give evidence that kurios meant

Lord Jesus in Luke 16:8. 1. First, the Lord Jesus told this story, because there was something commendable or some good example to commend there to his disciples. 2. There is no period after verse 8 in the Greek manuscripts which means verse 9 is spoken with verse 8. Verse

9 reads, “For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” Even the King James has no period between verse 8 and 9. Now, does it seem likely the rich man said, “the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.”?

The truth is simply the Lord who spoke the sentence (which was numbered by emn verse 8 and 9) was the Lord Jesus. 3. The Bible itself gives a distinction between where lord is (meaning the rich man) and where the Lord is meant. The story does not use the word “kurios” meaning

The rich man once. Instead, it uses possessive words such as which translate where the steward is talking “lord of his” or “his lord”, and later lord of the steward. If Jesus had included verse 8 and 9 in his story of the steward he would have

Used different word(s) for “lord” than just “kurios”. It seems evident that Luke wrote what “the Lord (Jesus) commended in verse 8 and 9. QUESTION 3. Are the items in Neh 5:10, 11 rent or interest? Nehemiah commanded that the Jews give back a hundredth part of corn, wine and oil to

Their poor brethrn, is this hundredth part rent or interest? Verse 10 calls it interest (usury) in English and Verse 11 does so in Luther’s German trans. It is O.K. to accept that these verses in scripture have labelled it correctly, for to do so

Contradicts no other scripture. In Joseph’s time 20% seems to have been customary as rent. 1% would hardly indicate rent. Chapter 3.3 Financial Wizzards & Wealthy Cults Two neighbor horse farmers came together one day to talk business. The first farmer sold his horse to the second for a quarter million

Dollars, and then bought it back for about $20 more. He could now advertise his horse (actually worth $20), as a horse he that he had paid over a quarter of a million dollars for. We can laugh over such schemes. And perhaps we should laugh at ourselves for having been

Fooled, for if there is one area in life that exceeds the religious in deception, and touches all of us it is the financial. What else can we do about it except laugh? The famous poet Lord Byron describes the archtype

Of our two farmers in 1823, Who keeps the world, both old and new, in pain Or pleasure? Who makes politics run glibber all? The shade of Bonaparte’s noble daring? Jew Rothschild and his fellow-Christian, Baring. You’ll learn about some other “neighbor horse traders” in this chapter too. ROTHSCHILD TALKS ABOUT THEIR DYNASTY

Lord Rothschild in his book The Shadow of a Great Man quotes a letter sent from Davidson on June 24, 1814 to Nathan Rothschild, “As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work together with your brothers, not a

House in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any house in the world.” 1 The closeness of the Rothschild brothers is

Seen in a letter from Saloman (Salmon) Rothschild to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, “We are like the mechanism of a watch: each part is essential.” 2 This closeness is further seen in that of the 18 marriages made by Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s grandchildren 16 were contracted between first

Cousins. VISITING THE NATION THE ROTHSCHILDS BUILT In 1974, in the summer after the Yom Kippur War this Author toured Israel, and got the chance to personally visit many of the buildings like the Knesset that the Rothschild’s money has built. The Knesset is the Israeli equivalent

To our Congress’s Capitol building. One of the Rothschilds in his will left money for ongoing building projects in Israel, and the Rothschilds are honored with a street named after them in Jerusalem. The people of Germany and Turkey have been very close. I can recall meeting Turkish

“Gastarbeiter” (guestworkers) in Germany. The reader will remember that Turkey fought on Germany’s side in W.W. I. A few powerful Jews, including the Rothschilds were responsible for the wording of the Treaty imposed on Germany that ended W.W. I.3 The treaty gave the Rothschild home in Frankfurt-on-the-Main. 16th century

Representatives from five major banks meet twice daily at the Rothschilds to determine the world’s gold price. Rothschilds the German owned railway rights in Palestine (which had been part of the Turkish Ottoman Empire), thus paving the way for the Rothschilds to have a sure leverage to dictate

Policy concerning Palestine. The Rothschilds had made loans to Turkey which amounted to almost one hundred million pounds. When the Turkish government collapsed after W.W. I because they were on the losing side, the Rothschilds had a claim on Palestine because of those unpaid Turkish loans.4 The British government

Followed the dictates of the Rothschilds. The British were given a mandate over Palestine, and the Rothschilds were able to through their proxies in the British government, to create the steps that led to the nation of Israel.5 THE ROTHSCHILDS AS “PROPHETS” One item stands out as a person listens to

The International Bankers and reads their books. They believe money is what makes the world go round. If you have money, you can do anything. Money is “God”, and it is worshipped and served. Even after these families accumulate more than can be spent, these devotees continue selling

Their souls for this false but powerful god. The great poet-philosopher Heinrich Heine (a Banker’s son) said, “Money is the god of our time, and Rothschild is his prophet.” 6 Following the cue of the Rothschilds, Heinrich Heine, a Jew, signed his name by drawing a Seal of

Solomon. 7 Amsel Rothschild is reported to have said, “Give me control of the economics of a country; and I care not who makes her laws.”8 Today his descendents meet twice daily in London to dictate to the world what the world price of gold will be. They also dictate what the

“Federal Reserve System” will do with America’s finances. ANOTHER GOD TOO According to eye-witnesses, who were prominent enough to visit one of the British Rothschild homes, the Rothschilds worship yet another god too, Satan. They set a place for him at their table.8a The Rothschilds have been Satanists for many generations.

The Rothschilds are an important part of the history of the Seal of Solomon (also known as hexagram, Magen David, six-pointed star, Star of David.) The Seal of Solomon, the hexagram, was not considered a Jewish symbol before the Rothschilds began using it.9 Throughout the

Middle Ages the Seal of Solomon had been used by Arab Magicians, Cabalist Magicians, Druid witches and Satanists. One of the few ancient uses of the symbol was on the floor of a 1,200 year old Moslem Mosque found where Tel Aviv is today.10 In the twelve century an Ashkenazic

Jew Menahem ben Duji, who thought he was the Messiah, used the magical symbol.11 Because the Rothschilds were Satanists they adopted this powerful magic symbol in 1822 for their coat- of-arms. The name they adopted for their family actually comes from the fact that in the 17th century Mayer Amschel Bauer began hanging

Out a red hexagram in front of their house to identify it. Mayer Amschel then decided to take the name red-schield (Rothschild in German) after the red Seal of Solomon that they used. Alice Bailey in A Treatise On White Magic,

P. 412, claims that the Hierarchy has a special group which she calls “the financial group” “controlling all that can be converted into energy, and constituting a dictatorship over all modes of intercourse, commerce and exchange.” According the Luciferian Alice Bailey, the “financial group” is the latest group directed by the Hierarchy.

In 1836 Zevi Hirsch Kalischer approached Rothschild and proposed Rothschild buy all of Erez Israel. It took many years for the Rothschilds to finally create Israel. The Rothschilds have been a primary force behind the creation of Israel, and so it is appropriate that the nation carries their

Magical Seal of Solomon as the state logo. The Ultra-orthodox Jews in Israel will not serve in the Israeli army because they know that Almighty God was not behind the creation of modern Israel, but rather the rich ungodly apostate Jews. They refuse to serve the ungodly. They

Are more wiser than men like Jerry Falwell who run around proclaiming Israel is God’s nation. Men like Falwell are the type that this Author finds reference to repeatedly in Jewish documents that speak of their power within the Fundamentalists. God is ultimately in charge, he has allowed Hitler to come to power, Stalin

To come to power, and the Rothschilds to come to power. In the same sense that God rules over and blessed Stalin’s Russia, he rules over America and Israel. To twist scriptures about God seating the rulers and then to apply them to bless one Satanic secular communist nation and not another

Is inconsistent and not correctly using the Word of Truth. Some people object that the conspiracy of Power is labelled Jewish rather than Satanic by certain concerned citizens. This objection is valid— however, will these objectors then take the obvious next step and admit the nation of Israel which the Rothschild’s created is Satanic

And not Jewish? But then who knows precisely why people do what they do? If you ask someone why he does something, he will give you one answer today, another tomorrow, and another the next day. Does he do what he does for a real reason,

Or a single motive? Perhaps to label the Power as only Satanic or only Jewish or only Masonic is to neglect the personal human dimension. This personal human dimension is godless. Being godless it fills that void, by pretending its men are gods. This brings us right back to the Gnostic

Religions and Satan. Most Jewish people do not concern themselves with learning the occultic significance to their treasured Magen David (Star of David). King David did not have anything to do with the hexagram, although his son Solomon did when he began worshipping Ashtoreth (star, also known as Astarte, Chiun, Kaiwan, Remphan, and Saturn).12

Solomon built altars to Star (Astarte, aka Ashtoreth). The god Saturn is associated with the Star but both Saturn and Astarte also been identified with a number of other names. Saturn is an important key to understanding the long heritage this conspiracy has back to antiquity. The city of Rome was originally known as Saturnia

Or City of Saturn. The Roman Catholic church retains much of the Saturn worship in its ritual. Saturn also relates to Lucifer.13 In various occult dictionaries Saturn is associated with evil. Saturn was important to the religion of Mithra, and also the Druids. CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD —connections to JWs, Mormons, and Judaism

It has been said all roads lead to Rome. For this book, it could be said all paths of investigation lead to the Rothschilds. Charles T. Russell, in a 1891 letter to Baron (Lord) Rothschild, mailed from Palestine, outlined possible courses of action that could be taken to establish the Jews in Palestine. Russell’s

Letters praised the Rothschild’s money which established Jewish colonies in Palestine. Russell writes Rothschild, “What is needed here, therefore, next to water and cleanliness, is a good government which will protect the poor from the ravenous and the wealthy. Banking institutions on sound bases, and doing business honorably, are also

Greatly needed.” Russell continues, “May the God of Jacob direct you, my dear Sir, and all interested with you in the deliverance and prosperity of Israel, and blessed will they be who, to any extent, yield themselves as his servants in fulfilling his will as predicted.”14 When the Mormon Church needed financing in

The late 19th century, they went to Kuhn,Loeb Co.15 To explain the Rothschild’s control of Kuhn, Loeb Co. here is some background information. The method that the House of Rothschild used to gain influence, was the same that Royalty had used for centuries, marriage. The Rothschild children, girls and boys, have

Had their spouses chosen on the basis of alliances that would benefit the House of Rothschild, but since consolidating world power they generally have married cousins these last two centuries.16 Jacob Schiff grew up in the house that the Rothschild’s had at 148 Judengasse, Frankfurt. Jacob Schiff came to the United States with Rothschild

Capital and took over control of a small Jewish banking concern founded by two Cincinnati dry goods merchants Abraham Kuhn and Solomon Loeb. He even married Soloman’s daughter. In 1885, Loeb retired, and Schiff ran the Kuhn, Loeb Co. for the Rothschilds until 1920 when he died. 17

During Russell’s and Brigham Young’s day, Lord Rothschild was considered the “lay leader of world Jewry.”18 Edmund Rothschild was President of the Jewish Colonization Association,19 which was a major Zionist group. Amselm Rothschild indicated that his grandfather Amschel Mayer Rothschild had insisted in Clause 15 of his will to his children, “may they and

Their descendants remain constantly true to their ancestral Jewish faith.”20 However, the will has been secret and there is no way of knowing what it says. The Rothschilds have not remained true to the Orthodox faith. If this was actually what Clause 15 said then something is amiss. The Jewish world has showered the Rothschilds

With praises, “The Rothschilds govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburg to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the

Captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people….The lion of the tribe of Judah, Baron Rothschild, possesses more real force than David—more wisdom than Solomon.” 21 The Prieure de Sion-the Elders of Sion 22 also relates to the Rothschilds who are reported to serve on a Jewish council of Elders of Sion.

23 The Rothschilds have “helped” the Jewish people the Rothschild’s own way. For those who admire stingyness, the Rothschilds will be greatly looked up to. For instance, the extent of James Rothschild’s charity in France to poor Jews was 5 francs (the equivalent of $1). 24 Their dynasty has destroyed honest Jews along with Christians.

Today, few dare criticize the Rothschilds. CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD—connections to secret societies The Rothschilds had played a major role in the Bavarian Illuminati,25 and it is known that a least one of the sons of Amsel was a member. As the reader remembers, Amsel placed his sons in the major European capitals, where they

Each set up the principal banking houses. By their own secret intelligence service and their own news network they could outmanouver any European government.26 The large amounts of voluminous correspondence by Rothschild couriers attracted attention,27 but no one ever stopped their personal intelligence and mail services.

After the Bavarian Illuminati were exposed, the central occult power over the European secret societies shifted to Carbonarism a.k.a. the Alta Vendita, 28 led by another powerful Rothschild, Karl Rothschild,29 son of Amschel. In 1818, Karl participated in a secret document that was sent

Out to the head-quarters of Masonry from the Alta Vendita. The Masons were quite distressed when a copy of this was lost, and offered rewards to anyone who could return the lost copy. It was originally written in Italian. Its title translates “Permanent Instructions, or Practical Code of

Rules; Guide for the Heads of the Highest Grades of Masonry.” 30 The Masonic reference book 10,000 Famous Freemasons, Vol. 4, p.74, indicates two other sons of Amschel were Masons, James Meyer Rothschild, and his brother Nathan Meyer Rothschild. James Rothschild in Paris was a 33 degree Scottish Rite Mason, and his brother

Nathan in London was a member of the Lodge of Emulation. And Jewish Freemason Katz indicates Solomon Meir Rothschild, a third member of the five brothers, was initiated into Freemasonry on June 14, 1809.31 The Rothschilds became powerful within Freemasonry. We find the Saint-Simonians, the occult religious

Millenialist forerunners of communism, praising Baron de Rothschild in their magazine Le Globe, “There is no one today who better represents the triumph of equality and work in the nineteenth century than M. le Baron de Rothschild….Was this Jew bom a millionaire? No, he was born poor, and if only you knew what genius,

Patience, and hard work were required to construct that European edifice called the House of Rothschild, you would admire rather than insult it.” Lionel de Rothschild (the de was added by the French Rothschilds) was involved with the first communist Internationale. The Mason Mazzini who helped start communism praised Rothschild, “Rothschild could be

King of France if he so desired.” 32 Adolphe Cremieux, was a french Jewish Mason (see chap. 1.4 for his credentials). The Rothschilds gave at least £ 1,000 to Cremieux to go to Damascus with Salomon Munk, and Sir Moses Montefiore to win the release of Jews

Imprisoned there, and to convince the Turkish Sultan to declare the charges of ritual murder false. 33 According to the three Jewish authors of Dope, Inc. the B’nai B’rith was a spin-off of the Order of Zion and was organized as a “covert intelligence front” for the House of Rothschild. It

Is highly probable that the B’nai B’rith was used as a Rothschild intelligence cover. The Rothschilds are prominent in the Bilderbergers too. The Rothschilds were closely related to the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Although many people today would not view the CFR as a secret society it was originally set up

As part of a secret society and it was kept secret for many years, in spite of its awesome power. Carroll Quigley, professor of International Relations at the Jesuit Georgetown University, exposed the Round Table Group with his book Tragedy and Hope.24 The Rothschilds supported Rhodes to form De

Beers.35 Later, Rhodes made seven wills which established a secret society modelled after the Jesuits and Masons to help bring in a One-World- Government centered upon Britain, and the Rhodes Scholarships. 36 The inner group was established in Mar. 1891 and consisted of Rhodes, Stead, Lord Esher (Brett), and 33°

Mason Alfred Milner.33bb A secondary circle of “potential members of the Circle of Initiates” consisted of the Jew Lord Balfour, Sir Harry Johnson, Lord Rothschild, Lord Grey and others. Initially, Lord Rothschild was part of the inner group of Rhode’s secret society, but was replaced by his

Son-in-law Lord Rosebury who wasn’t as conspicuous.37 The Fabian Socialists dominated the staff at Oxford when the Rhodes Scholars began arriving. These scholars then received indoctrination and preparation to become part of an international socialist New World Order.38 The Round Table Group developed from the inner executive circle of Rhode’s secret society.

The outer circle was established after the start of the 20th century. The Round Table Group was extended after W.W. I by organizing a front organization the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The Council of Foreign Relations was the American part of this front. The inner circle

Continues to direct the outer circle and its two front organizations RIIA and CFR. The CFR in turn set up a number of fronts including the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD—management of the Catholic and Czars’ wealth and the capture of the Orthodox Church’s wealth

Early in the 19th century the Pope came to the Rothschilds to borrow money. The Rothschilds were very friendly with the Pope, causing one journalist to sarcasticly say “Rothschild has kissed the hand of the Pope…Order has at last been re-established.”39 The Rothschilds in fact over time

Were entrusted with the bulk of the Vatican’s wealth. The Jewish Ency., Vol. 2, p.497 states, “It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Rothschilds that at the present time (1905) the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.” Researcher Eustice Mullins writes that the

Rothschilds took over all the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church in 1823. 40 Today the large banking and financial business of the Catholic Church is an extensive system interlocked with the Rothschilds and the rest of the International Banking system. The great wealth of the Russian Czars was

Entrusted to the Rothschilds, $35 million with the Rothschild’s Bank of England, and $80 million in the Rothschild’s Paris bank. The Rothschilds financed the Russian Revolution which confiscated vast portions of the Orthodox Church’s wealth. They have been able to prevent (due to their power) the legitimate heirs of the

Czars fortune to withdraw a penny of the millions deposited in a variety of their banks. The Mountbattans, who are related to the Rothschilds, led the court battles to prevent the claimants from withdrawing any of the fortune. In other words, the money they invested in the Russian Revolution, was not only paid back directly

By the Bolshevists in millions of dollar of gold, but by grabbing the hugh deposits of the Czars’ wealth, the Rothschilds gained what is now worth over $50 Billions.41 CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD—CONTROL OVER SATANISM & WITCHCRAFT Chapter 2.11 gives the names of a Witchcraft Council of 13 which is under Rothschild control

And in turn issue orders to various groups. One of the purest form of Satanism can be traced to the Jewish Sabbatain sect and its Frankist spinoff. The leaders of this up to the Rothschilds were: Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) Nathan of Gaza (16??-?) Jacob Frank (1726-1791) Rothschilds Three connections between Satanism, evil, and money.

Money naturally attracts itself to evil. For instance, if a woman prostitutes herself she may receive a great sum of money, but who will pay her for keeping her virginity or her dignity? If you are a hit man a large amount of money is yours if you kill your target, who will

Pay you if you would miss your target? Second, evil men believe in where there is a will there is a way, and they are willing to sell their souls for their God money. They will employ evil to gain money. While most people are quite aware of these

Last two connections, a third may likely have escaped their attention. Thirdly, the principle group of men who cranked up International Banking were Satanists from the beginning. These Satanists now are the ones who run the Federal Reserve and are responsible for the creation of U.S. Federal Reserve notes. Just having total control

Over the supply of U.S. paper money almost gives them leverage over the world’s finances, without mentioning they control the world bank. It is no accident then, that once they established world financial control, they would do all in their power to divide and conquer and destroy both

The Christian and the Moslem faith in God. These powerful Bankers relate to faith in God as Cain related to his brother Abel. That they may be related to the Jewish people, does not mean they have the Jewish people’s best interest at heart. Initially Sabbetai Zevi was rejected by many

Jews. His sect gained momentum in second half of the seventeenth century in southeastern Poland.42 In 1759-60, 500 Jewish Sabbateans “converted” to Christianity. 43 In 1715, 109 of the 415 Jewish families in Frankfurt were engaged in moneylending. The rest were merchants of various kinds. The concepts

That Satanism holds to were a natural shoe in to justify for many of these Jewish bankers the type of behavior they were engaged in.44 LONG-STORY SHORT Many divisions and battles between religious elements in the world have been encouraged and supported by the Power’s wealth. Unfortunately, many have been fooled into thinking that being

Devout and faithful to God is the source of religious fighting. In some areas of the world, Moslems, Christians, and others have gotten along fine for centuries. Religious tensions do spring to some degree from within the religions themselves,

But the fuel to keep those fires burning and to light up conflicts often come from the Power’s wealth. An obvious example is the Iran-Iraq war. CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD—CONTROL OVER W.W. I TREATY When Germany fell, not only did Rothschild agents draft the treaty, prepare the idea of the

League of Nations, but Max Rothschild was one of 11 men who took control over Bavaria. Max Rothschild was a Freemason in Lodge No. 11, Munich, Germany. CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD—connections to MI5, Rockefellers, J.P. Morgan, CFR, et. al. Victor Rothschild, who worked for J.P. Morgan & Co., and was an important part of MI5

(British Intelligence). Victor Rothschild was also a communist and member of the Apostles Club at Cambridge.45 Lord Rothschild was one of the original members of Rhode’s Round Table group which developed into the CFR. It was the Rothschilds who had financed Cecil Rhodes, beginning in Africa. The Rothschilds’ have several agents which

Their money got started and who still serve them well, the Morgans and the Rockefellers. The Rockefellers were Marrano Jews. The original Rockefeller made his money selling narcotics, (they weren’t illegal then). After acquiring a little capital he branched out in oil. But it was the Rothschild capital that made the Rockefeller’s so

Powerful. “They also financed the activities of Edward Harriman (railroads) and Andrew Carnegie Steel.” 46 CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD—Power within Christendom The Rothschilds also wielded much influence and power not only in Secret Societies, but also in Christendom’s churches. The Salvation Army under the suggestion of

The Rothschilds adopted the Red Shield (Roth-red Schild-shield) for their logo. One history of the Rothschilds remarks, “The Rothschilds had rapidly propelled themselves into a position of immense financial power and political influence. They were an independent force in the life of Europe, accountable to no one and, to a large extent, reliant on

No one. Popular lampoons depicted them as the real rulers of Christendom…” 47 Some of the Rothschilds have been involved in the campaign to loosen public morals. The first executive Secretary of the National Student Forum was John Rothschild. This National Student

Forum changed its name like articles of clothing. Speaking about clothing, one of the aims of this Socialist group was to promote public nudity, and free love. This organization had the following constituent groups Radcliffe Liberal Club, Union Theological Seminary Contemporary Club, Yale

Liberal Club48 to name just a few. A further development of this was the Youth Peace Federation which consisted of the League of Youth of Community Church, Methodist Epworth League, NY District, Young Judea, and Young People’s Fellowship of St. Phillip’s Parish 49 to name a few.

American religious men have ties to the Rothschilds especially through their various agents. Harry Emerson Fosdick, who was Pastor of Rockefeller’s church was also among the Presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation. John Foster Dulles, CFR, was chairman of the board of the Rockefeller Foundation, and married a Rockefeller,

Janet Pomeroy Avery. Remember John Foster Dulles was an important Federal Council of Churches of Christ official.(See chap. 2.9) Every road leads back to the Rothschilds. There are more items than what have been mentioned above linking the Rothschilds to the various tenticles. Each of the various tenticles that conspiracy

Theorists have put forth,—the Jews, the Masons, the Intelligence Communities, the International Bankers, the Prieure de Sion, the Catholics, the Trilateral commission, the CFR, the New Age, the Cults— each ties back to the Rothschild’s power. EXTENT OF ROTHSCHILD POWER According to one source “it was estimated

That they controlled half the wealth of the world.” 50 The Federal Reserve Bank of New York was controlled by five banks which owned 53% of its stock. These five banks were controlled by Nathan M. Rothschild & Sons of London. Control over the U.S. Fed is basically control over

The world’s money. That fact alone shows how immense the Rothschild Power is. If one examines who has been appointed to head the Fed, and to run it, the connections of the “Federal” Reserve System to the Rothschilds can further be seen. Another private enterprise using the name Federal that the Rothschilds also direct is

Federal Express. Any one else might be taken to court for making their businesses sound like their are government, not the Rothschilds. It is appropriate for them to appropriate the name of Federal, because by way of M16 via the CIA they instruct the U.S. government. Senators are bought and

Paid off by their system, as investigators of the BCCI are discovering. The Rothschilds have been intimately involved in witchcraft and the Illuminati since its early known history. The Kaiser of Germany seems to refer to them when he said, “the magic powers

Of money as wielded by the Lord of Lucre are powers of Black Magic at its blackest.” 51 If only half of the wealth is controlled by the Rothschilds, it indicates that if they are to be part of the world’s rulership, they must have allies. ALLIES

The Rothschilds and Rockefellers are only two of thirteen controlling families of the Illuminati.52 Two Jewish families that appear to be prominent are the Oppenheims and the Oppenheimers. A. Oppenheim was situated in Cologne. The Oppenheimers were early members of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Bund der Gerechten (League

Of the Just) was an Illuminati front run mainly by Jews who were Satanists. This Bund financed in part by the Rothschilds paid the Satanist and Mason Karl Marx to write the Communist Manefesto. The Jew Gumpel Oppenheim was in the inner circle of the Bund. His relative Heinrich

Oppenheim masterminded the communist revolution of 1848 in Germany. The Communist Party’s official histories even accept the Bund as the predecessor of Communism. The Oppenheimers apparently are close to the Rothschilds. J. Robert Oppenheimer of the CFR was exposed as a communist. Harry Oppenheimer, an international banker, is chairman of the

Jewish De Beers world-wide diamond monopoly, and chairman of the Anglo-American Corp. Oppenheimers can be found in important financial positions in the U.S. They help run around 10 large foundations, including the Oppenheimer Haas Trust of NY for the care of needy Jewish children. The Jewish Ency. Vol. 2, p. 496 indicates

Other Jewish families “adopted the Rothschild plan.” These were the Lazards, Stems, Speyers, and Seligmans. The Rothschild plan was to place family members in the 5 largest European capitals to coordinate their activities. One of Germany’s largest magazines is the Stern, and Ernst

Stem is second-in-command of the World Bank.53 The Jewish families that established the Frankfurt Judenloge (this was the Masonic lodge the Rothschilds belonged to in Frankfurt) included the Adlers, Speyers, Reisses, Sichels, Ellisons, Hanaus, Geisenheimers, and Goldschmidts. Isaac Hildesheim, a Jew who changed his name to Justus Hiller is credited as being the founder

Of this Frankfurt lodge. Michael Hess, principal of the Reformed Jewish school Philanthropin was an important figure in the lodge too, as was Dr. Ludwig Baruch (later Borne) who joined in 1808. Most of these Frankfurt Jewish Freemasons engaged in commerce.54 Those Freemasons from 1817-1842 were the leaders of the Frankfurt Jewish community. 55

A gentile Mason in Frankfurt Johann Christian Ehrmann began warning the German people that the Frankfurt Jewish Masons wanted a world republic based on humanism. In 1816 he came out with a warning pamphlet Das Judenthum in der M[aurere]y (The Jews in Masonry). A powerful ally of the world’s Jewry can be

Seen beginning with men like Oliver Cromwell, who was considered a Mason. Cromwell was financed by Jews, and helped the Jews gain power in England. Cromwell was willing to go along with the Jews, because he became convinced of British Israelism. Since the core of the conspiracy of power is Jewish,

The attitude of those allied with it hinges on their attitude toward the Jewish people. The religious idea that the British people are descended from the tribes of Israel doesn’t automatically place people into the camp of the conspiracy. Some of the British-Israelites realize

That the so called Jewish people in general have no claim over the promises of God. For that reason, they realize that it is not the Christian duty to bow and scrape at their every move. When Christians can be arrested in Israel and abused, and Christians will not even stand up for

Their own kind, we can see how much hold the idea of the “Chosen Race” theory has over Christendom. Some of the British Israelites such as the Mormons, the old New England wealthy families such as make up the Order, some Masons

And New Agers, and the non-Jewish members of the Priuere de Sion are collaborating with the One-World-Power. The anglican church which is run by the Freemasons is strongly British Israelistic. SORTING OUT THE VARIOUS IDENTITY GROUPS In contrast, a hodge-podge of groups which are opposed to the conspiracy like some Neo-Nazi

Groups, and various Churches unrelated with them are also believers in British Israelism. These various groups are sometimes all lumped together as the “Identity” movement, which is misleading because of their vast differences. It is important to diferentiate between those groups that are trying to approach things from a Christian perspective and place themselves

Under the authority of God, and those who are setting themselves up under the New Order’s authority, or under their own authority. CO-MASTERS OF THE WORLD- The Media Eustice Mullins has published his research in his book Who Owns the TV Networks showing

That the Rothschilds have control of all three U.S. Networks, plus other aspects of the recording and mass media industry. It can be added that they control Reuters too. From other sources it appears CNN, which began as an independent challenge to the Jewish

Network monopoly, ran into repeated trickery, and ended up part of the system. Money from B.C.C.I.,(B.C.C.I, has been one of the New World Orders financial systems for doing its dirty business such as controlling Congressmen, and is involved with INSLA, the Iran-Contra Scandal,

Centrust, and other recent scandals) which has tainted so many aspects of public power in the U.S. has also been behind CNN. Perhaps nothing dominates the life of some Americans as does the television. Americans sit themselves before the television set and simply absorb what it projects to them. On a day to day

Basis the biggest way the Rothschilds touch the lives of Americans are the three major networks which are under Rothschild direction. To illustrate this we will examine who run the networks. This list is not current, and no attempt was to provide that. The length of

Writing a book insures that some material will be dated anyway. NBC NBC DIRECTORS ROTHSCHILD CONNECTION OTHER CONNECTIONS John Brademas Dir. Rockefllr. Fdtn. c h r m . F e d . R e s e r v e

Bank of N.Y. which c o n t r o l s all o t h e r Fed.R.Bks. Humanist of the Yr 1978 Cecily B. Selby n a t . d i r . Girl S c o u t s (the occult is now part of the to Girl

Scout program), dir. Avon P r o d u c t s and Loehmann’s (dresses). H u s b . J a m e s Cole, pres. Bowdoin College Peter G. Peterson frmr. hd. of Kuhn, Loeb Ex-Sec. of Commerce Robert Cizek dir. First City Bancorp d i r

. R C A , c h a i r m n Cooper Industries Thomas O. Paine P r e s . of N o r t h r u p –

L a r g e d e f e n s e c o n t r a c t r . Dir. of I n s t . of S t r a t e g i c S t u d i e s , dir of

Various munitions assoc. Donald Smiley dir. of several Morgan dir. of Ralston- firms P u r i n a , I r v i n g T r u s t , Metro-Life and U.S. Steel and chrm of Macy Co.

David C. Jones P r e s . C o n s o l i d a t e d C o n t r . , dir. U.S. Steel, Kemper Insur. Thornton Bradshaw dir. Rock. Bros. Fund d i r . A s p e n Inst. of

H u m a n i s t i c S t u d i e s , A t l a n t i c – R i c h f i e l d Oil, Champion Paper Co., chairman of RCA Brandon Tartikoff (head of NBC entertainment) Jewish

CBS Harold Brown exec. dir. Trilat. Com. J e w i s h , ex-Sec. of Air Force and ex-Sec. of Def. Roswell Gilpatric Kuhn Loeb firm C.S.& M dir. Fed. Res. Bk.NY Henry B. Schnacht CFR, Brookings Inst. d i

R . C h a s e M a n h a t t a n , d i r AT&T, c h r m n Cummins Engine Co., Committee for Economic Develop. Michel C. Bergerac dir. Manufacturers chrmn. Revlon Hanover James D. Wolfensohn frmr.hd. J. Henry Schroder Bank

Walter Cronkite Newton D. Minow dir. Rand Corp Franklin A. Thomas head of Ford Found. Marietta Tree assoc. w/ Ditchley dir. Winston Foundation & dir. C h u r c h i l l F o u n d . , dir.

S a l o m o n Bro., dir. U.S.T r u s t , granddgtr of fdr. of Groton, hsbd in Br. Intell., THE ROTHSCHILD’S HISTORY BY A JEWISH WRITER RELATED TO THE ROTHSCHILDS Jewish writer Anka Muhlstein wrote a book Baron James The Rise of the French Rothschilds.

I prefer paraphrase and make short quotes from her book, because I am trying to document for the reader the mindset and history of the Rothschilds. Anka Muhlstein has nothing against the Rothschilds, so it will be easier for the reader to accept what she says about them than from

Me. I can’t require the reader to read her book, but I can try to summarize some of the appropriate thoughts. Other books also relate many of the things Anka does, but again if I write a footnoted article, it will not carry the weight as my paraphrase will. The reader is recommended

To read the book first hand if he has the time and is interested in the details of James’ life. The Jews in the 18th century were restricted to living in Ghettos. Mayer Amschel Rothschild lived in the Frankfurt ghetto, (p.22) The Jews were repressed by outsiders. (p.23) They lived in

Geographically isolated and self-contained communities (p. 24). The Jewish communities in Europe used a secret relay system between all the Ghettoes. Hebrew characters were one effective code. (p.24) Because of the persecution and repression, the Jewish communities were very tight- knit and highly organized.(p.23) They were deeply hostile to the Christian people. Christians had

Restricted their own people from money-lending with interest, so lending money on interest had become a Jewish enterprise. The German princes of Thurn and Taxis in the 16th century initiated a postal service. Mayer Amschel loaned them money. (p.21) “Certainly they [the Rothschilds] discovered

The latitude that the Thurn and Taxis allowed themselves in unsealing letters, possibly divulging their contents, and according to their own interests, delaying or accelerating delivery.”(p.22) When it profited Mayer Amschel, he would hire Christians, but in general his business and banking were conducted by his close knit family.

For instance Mayer Amschel hired a young Christian woman to write his letters for him.(p. 25) Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his family were wholeheartedly Jewish.(p.27) Mayer Amschel Rothschild picked his sons’ wifes for the business gains the wives would bring the family. The

Oldest son was not happy with this (actually he was bitter because he was denied marriage to the woman he loved), but he complied with his father’s choice.(p.26) Amschel’s daughters all married bankers—in Worms, Sichel, and Beyfus.(p.26) Mayer had ten children and they were all

Employed in the family business. (p.25) The Jews were taught from childhood up, that the Christians were to blame for all their woes, and that the Christians were to be feared and detested.(p.24) Mayer Amschel had secret, underground passages. (p.22) His carriage was honey-combed with secret drawers. (p.27) The Napoleonic War greatly helped the Rothschild

Business.(p. 27) Rothschild even outsmarted Napoleon—because the Rothschilds had such good connections.(p.38) The Rothschilds smuggled during the English blocade of Napoleon’s Europe, and made millions.(p.33) “The Rothschilds changed course constantly during this period, always manuevering to avoid any kind of political commitment.”(p.34)

One of the things Mayer Amschel set up, was to disperse his 5 sons to the major capitals of Europe. Anka attributes the respectibility of Jewish money lending to the help it gave merchants and entrepreneurs. [See chap. 3.2 -this Author’s view is that merchants had been borrowing for

Centuries prior to interest taking becoming acceptable by society in the 19th century. It was greatly in part due to who owned and controlled the major newspapers in the 19th century—Jews and Masons—that led the public to change.] “The obligation to reimburse a loan and to pay

Interest became less onerous to men whose affairs had flourished as a result of the borrowed money. The Jewish lender ceased to be a bloodsucker; often, indeed, he became an associate of the borrower.”(p.31) [The Bible says a borrower is a slave to the lender, hardly an association to be desired.]

The business of financing Monarchs was lucrative. The Rothschilds had developed several traits in the ghetto that made their family hard to stop. “The great gift the Frankfurt ghetto bestowed upon him [James Rothschild] was adaptibility, a quality matched by the driving force of his ambition, his prodigious energy, tremendous

Powers of concentration, and determination to get even [with Christians]. James set out to make his place in the world.” (p.40) The five Rothschild brothers, each in the five major European capitals set up their own private courier system which was faster than the regular mail.(p.47)

The Rothschilds had news whether political or economic faster than anyone else including the monarchs. “Thus the Rothschilds had news before anyone else, including ministers [govt.]; they also understood how to make use of it.”(p.47) [Somewhat akin to how money could be made off of knowing the future.] The Rothschilds normal

Correspondence to each other was in code.(p.46) Their world was one of finance, politics and secrecy. In the anti-Napoleonic time period, the Rothschilds increased their wealth ten-fold. (p.47) “…James. He enjoyed, moreover, a rock-solid strength and stability, built up by his family,

That family simultaneously closed tight like a fist, united by mutual confidence and an invisible wall of secrecy, yet wide open to the outside world. Such was the cohesion of the Rothschilds that the removal of one or more of them left no gap in their common defenses.” The Rothschilds carried out espionage with

Their own intelligence service, and other questionable subversive activities but none of these could be tracked. “Whenever Mayer Amschel and his sons were on the verge of being caught out, some highly placed person stepped in and stopped the investigation.”(p.36) The made their money doing technically illegal activity. The original large sum of money

Made was to take the Elector of Hesse’s large sum and instead of investing it into government bonds as directed—to put it to use at investments of higher returns, and giving the elector the return from the government bonds.

Anka writes, “The Elector was never the wiser, but even if he had been, he could hardly have complained of disobedience.”(p.34) In summary, the Mafia-like closeness of the Rothschild family, along with their tactic to situate themselves in all the major capitals, along with their own quick secret personal

News/intelligence/mail service gave them the contacts and the power to manipulate all kinds of business opportunities. 1. Lord Rothschild. The Shadow of a Great Man. London: 1982, p.6. 2. Wilson, Derek. Rothschild The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty. NY: Charles Schribner’s Sons, p. 101. Source of quote given in the book.

3. Armstrong, George. Rothschild Money Trust. CPA reprint of 1940 ed., pp.66-88. Also in this vein read Mullins, Eustice. The World Order, pp. 31-33 and other sources too. 4. Darms, Anton. The Delusion of British-Israelism. N.Y.: Loizeaux Brothers, pp. 186-187. 5. Darms, op. cit., plus there are numerous

Other accounts of how Israel was started with British help, and one has to simply see who did it and their Rothschild connections. 6. As quoted in Sampson, Anthony. The Money Lenders. Middlesex, Eng.: Penguin Books, Ltd., 1985, p.37. 7. Encyclopaedia Judaica, p. 696.

8. Mohr, Gordon. The Hidden Power Behind Freemasonry. Burnsville, MN: Weisman Pub., 1990, p. 154. 8a. Various high-ranking Satanists that the power of God has pulled out of Satanism have said they were eyewitnesses to Satan appearing at the Rothschilds. What they witnessed when Satan showed up at the Rothschilds was that Satan

Appeared as an extremely beautiful man, except his hoofs would be cloven. He would wear a black tuxedo to gamble and play cards (winnings were sexual victims) and a white tuxedo when coming only to socialize. 9. An excellently researched book by a Christian

Journalist of Jewish ancestry is The Six-Pointed Star by O.J. Graham. New Puritan Library, 1984. This book covers the satanic/magic history of the Seal of Solomon before its modern Jewish use. The book shows how the symbol was not a Jewish symbol until recent times.

10. Goldberg, M. Hirsch. The Jewish Connection. NY: Stein & Day, 1976, p.197. 11. Koestler, Arthur. The Thirteenth Tribe. NY: Random House, 1976, pp. 136-137. 12. The Satanic star is refered to in Acts 7:43, in Amos 5:25-26. “The shield carried by King David…was traditionally believed to be engraved

Either with the name of God or the Menorah, or Psalm 67.” Siegel, Richard and Carl Rheins. “Metamophoses of a Tree; 10 Jewish Symbols and Their Meanings,” Jewish 44 Almanac. New York: Bantam Books, 1980, p. 515. 13. Hall, Manly P., 33°. Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic & Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy. 17ed., L.A.,CA: The Philosophical Research

Soc, 1971, p. CXLV. 14. WT Dec. 1891, pp.170-71 See also WTR p.1342. C.T. Russell’s letter was sent by him from Palestine in Aug., 1891 to Rothschild. 15. Taylor, Samuel W. Rocky Mountain Empire The Later-Day Saints Today. NY: Macmillan Pub. Co., Inc., 1978, p.66. 16. Read Wilson, Derek. Rothschild, The Wealth

And Power of a Dynasty. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1988. 17. Mullins, The World Order, p. 11. 18. Wilson, op. cit., pp. 338-339. 19. ibid,p.338 20. The Reign of the House of Rothschild, p. 405. 21. Muhlstein, Anka. Baron James,The Rise of the French Rothschilds. NY: The Vendome Press,

(n.d.-c.l980) . 22. Baigent, Leigh, Lincoln. Holy Blood, Holy Grail, pp. 190-199. 23. Various references. For instance, Armstrong, The Rothschild Trust, p. 196, “That is the present objective of Jeroboam Rothschild and his secret Elders of Zion.” 24. Wilson, Derek, op. cit., p. 45.

25. William Still writes, “In 1782, the headquarters of illuminized Freemasonry was moved to Frankfurt, the stronghold of German finance, and controlled by the Rothschilds.” Still, The New World Order, p. 82. 26. Muhlstein, Anka. Baron James, The Rise of the French Rothschilds., p.47. She describes how their private courier system was faster than

The regular mail. 27. Corti, Count Egon Caesar, (trans, from German by B.& B. Lunn). The Rise Of The House Of Rothschild. Boston: Western Is., 1972, p.278 cf. pp. 386-389. 28. Miller, Edith Star. Occult Theocracy, chap on Carbonarism, pp. 427-438 is a start in learning its importance. 29. Mullins, op. cit., p.2.

30. di Gargano, Michael. Irish and English Freemasons and their Foreign Brothers, 1878, p. 62. 31. Bruell, Geschichte, p. 24 as quoted by Katz, Jacob. Jews and Freemasons in Europe 1723- 1939.(trans. by L. Oschry) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970, pp.61,248. 32. Mullins, op. cit. p. 3. 33. Muhlstein, op. cit. p. 125

34. Carroll Quigley’s book was very enlightening on the New World Order except that it leaves out the Catholic Church and the Jesuits’ participation, at a time that their participation was increasing dramatically. In other words, Quigley’s book must be taken with a grain of salt, it

Would be a mistake to believe it to be infallible or unbiased. 35. Le Sueur, Gorden (Rhode’s confidential secretary). Cecil Rhodes The Man and His Work. London: John Murray, 1913, p. 10. 36. Aydelotte, Frank (co-fndr CFR and Amer. Sec. to Rhodes Trustees). American Rhodes Scholarships. “The model for this proposed

Secret society was the Society of Jesus, though he mentions also the Masons.” 37. Allen, Gary. Nixon’s Palace Guard. Boston: Western Islands, 1971, p. 9. cf. Quigley. Tragedy and Hope. 38. Martin, Rose. Fabian Freeway .Boston: Western Islands, 1966. 39. Wilson, Derek. Rothschild The Wealth and

Power of a Dynasty, p. 101. The source of the quote is given in the book. 40. Mullins, Eustice. The Curse of Canaan, p.125. 41. Mullins, Eustice. The World Order, p.5. 42. Friesel, Evyatar. Atlas of Modern Jewish History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. 43. ibid.

44. Mohr, op. cit. p. 118. 45. Read Mullins, The World Order. 46. Still, op. cit. p. 136 quoting Griffin, op. cit. p. 37. See also Mullins, op. cit., p. 11. 47. Wilson, op. cit., p. 92. 48. pamphlet published by The American Defense Society Inc., 154 Nassau St., NY.

49. Peace Militant. NY: The New History Foundation. 50. Griffin, Des. Descent into Slavery. S. Pasadena, CA: Emissary Publications, 1980, p. 52. 51. England Under the Heel of the Jew. London, 1918, pp 60-2. 52. Confidential interview with those who were recently in the Illuminati hierarchy.

53. Smith, Gary. Land of the ZOG. Portland, OR: VuePoint, 1989, p.58. 54. Katz, Jacob. Jews and Freemasons in Europe 1723-1939. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1970, p.60. 55. ibid, p.92 Chapter 3.4 EDUCATION TEST YOUR AWARENESS How fitting to start this chapter on education with a test. It is a fairly straightforward question.

Tell me which country I am describing? —your choices are Nazi Germany and the United States. This country backs their schools with their police. Their textbooks are updated and rewritten. Teachers are required to join a national league. Teachers are required to report parents and other non-school violations. The emphasis is more

On ideology than academics. There are declining test scores. The training of teachers is vested in the state where such universities indoctrinate the state’s philosophy to the future teachers. Morals were declining. There were new freedoms. Immorality was heralded in the schools. The textbooks were full of falsehoods. Parents

Refusing to participate in the compulsary education were jailed or killed. Teachers began giving blind support to the state. With what I know, I would have to say it describes both Nazi Germany and the United States. How did you answer? Changes are coming one after another, they come gradual enough that unless people pull

Themselves out of their own context and get a broader look, people may inaccurately evaluate themselves. THE MASONS & KLAN SURPRISE OREGON Early one June morning in 1922, Ku Klux Klansmen and Freemasons made their way quietly to public areas throughout Oregon. At 8 a.m. sharp they began quickly to gather

Signatures from citizens for a “Compulsary Education Bill” that they told signers would make public school education compulsary for all “children between the ages of eight and sixteen years.”1 Many of the signatories would later feel they had been deceived by the men carrying out this surprise campaign.2 Of the 50,000 signatores

That the Masons would boast they had collected by the end of the day, only 29,000 signatures were actually collected, and 13,000 of those were rejected as illegal or duplications. That left 16,000, yet, only 13,000 were needed to place it on the Oregon ballot.3 The Bill was a well-thought out campaign by

The Scottish Rite Lodge’s leadership to bring education under the control of the state. They had obtained petition sheets, and quietly passed these out to lodges around Oregon, and to sympathetic fraternal organizations such as the K.K.K. The co-author of the Bill was the Knights of the K.K.K.’s leader. 4 Most of the paid advertising

In the state was over the signature of “P.S. Malcom, 33°, inspector-general in Oregon, Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite.” PAROCIAL SCHOOLS Originally, Christian churches had started the schools in early Oregon. Church run schools were still in abundance in 1922, and flourished beside the public schools. The language of the

Bill was subtly worded to begin a process to eliminate the role of the church in education. As there was already a compulsary school law the public advertisements (almost all public ads were paid for by the Masonic Lodges) were misleading. People initially were led to believe the

Bill was only about making children attend public school. Once the public got an honest chance they saw it for what it was. The Oregon Voter said, “It is as an admendment to the Compulsary Education Law that this initiative bill comes before the public, although it is aimed at Catholic parochial schools

And includes all denominational and private schools in its sweeping abolition.” (The Oregon Voter, Portland, Or., July 15, 1922, p.8) The Masons made this appealing pitch, “Our children must not under any pretext…be divided into antagonistic groups, there to absorb the narrow views of life as they are taught.”

Supposedly, parochial schools create a citizenship of “cliques, cults, and factions.” 5 Strange, Christians are berated at one moment for wanting everyone to believe the same and are portrayed as obviously at odds with our wonderful diverse cultural heritage, yet at other times they are berated for being devisive.

Oh for consistency. Another Masonic ploy was to wave the flag. They pretended that they wanted the bill to pass to promote Americanism. P.S. Malcolm, 33°, who led the campaign said, “The establishment of high standards of education in our public schools, the teaching of

American principles and ideals, and the compulsory public school attendance in the primary grades, is a nationwide Masonic movement.” 6 In one ad, Malcom urges voters to vote for the Bill in the interest of “One Flag—One School- -One Language.” 7

Although the call to American Patriotism worked, it was a deception on the part of the higher Masonic leadership—who had for many years promoted the elimination of all nationalism.8 Even while waving the flag to insure passage of this Bill, they were working hard to destroy

All forms of Nationalism and to strengthen the League of Nations. On Oct. 26, 1922 the readers of the News of Springfield, OR (along with other newspaper reader across Oregon) read a masonic paid ad in favor of the Bill which said, “At present, while the private schools are few and small, is

The time to make the change proposed by the public school bill.” “The Ladies of the Invisible Empire” (the female branch of the K.K.K.) campaigned to get women voters, many who had not voted before to vote for the bill. 9 The origins of the Bill were the Scottish Rite and that was openly admitted.

The reason for selecting Oregon for the campaign, was stated by the Mason Robert F. Smith, It is not that there is any immediate and particular danger here. But in the East the number of foreign born and indifferent people is so overwhelming that

Such a bill as this one could never be put through. In accordance with the wishes of the supreme council of the Scottish Rite, therefore, we are beginning in Oregon, to set an example for the rest of the country. 10 This Author would add that it certainly didn’t

Hurt the Masonic campaign that Oregon has been under strong Masonic control since its inception. Almost all of the Oregon governors have been Freemasons 11 , and a large portion of the rest of the governing elements too. A large portion of Oregon’s political power has always recided

In the Masonic Lodge. 12 One Oregon Masonic Senator revealed that if he wanted to be elected to governor the Mafia was capable of getting him elected. When he rejected the Mafia’s help, he lost. 13 The Mafia and the Masonic Lodge have worked together in numerous instances.

When the Mason Oregon Senator Mark Hatfield wanted his daughter into Med school, a special admission rule happened to be passed to allow his daughter into the Oregon Health Sciences University. Two men on the admissions committee resigned in protest. The Oregonian didn’t print their article on the scandal, until after Hatfield’s reelection campaign

Suceeded.14 The Senator reportedly said, “I did not want her to receive any special consideration.”15 The power that would be involved for anyone to pass a special Med school admissions policy is not near as alarming as the power it would take for anyone to squelch a scandal for over a

Year until an election was over. William F. Woodward, a Mason and a long-time school board member, in a talk entitled “Our public schools as a Masonic objective.” given to the Unity and Mt. Hood Lodges (Feb. 24,1936) reported that, “It may interest you, my Brothers, to know that in this District over forty-three per

Cent of teachers, supervisors and principals are members of our Masonic Body.” “Now having thrust the Bible from our public schools as a textbook we must depend upon untaught, though accepted, principles of conduct resting largely upon home influence and training, too often in these chaotic days, lacking…” “This must

Not be a Protestant, Jewish, Roman Catholic, Seven- Day Adventist, or any other particular type of religious nation.” Woodward was correct that the home training is not what it should be, and since the Masons have kicked the Bible and its values out of the schools, what has happened? Woodward’s

Desire that this not be any particular type of religious nation has been strongly promoted. The Scottish Rite clearly state their position, “Our constitutions and statutes permit, and indeed guarantee, the broadest range to religious liberty, both to the religious and the irreligious…we take great pride in them.” 16 But the Scottish

Rite felt that the early constitutions were too religious, and didn’t assure total equality of religions.17 The Scottish Rite led the battle to prohibit any public aid to sectarian schools, such as free textbooks, or public paid transportation to parochial school pupils. They worked hard to eliminate the Bible, prayer, singing hymns, and release

Time programs by public schools for religious education. The obvious intent was to eliminate parochial schools, by making the competition between public and private schools unequal. Those who disagree with the values taught in the public schools are forced to support them. Why were the Masons so intent on the destruction of

Parocial school? The intent of the Constution was to protect against any religion becoming the state, not the elimination of religious intruction. AN EXAMPLE OF MASONIC ATTITUDES A book written by 32° Mason Emmet McLoughlin Crime and Immorality in the Catholic Church was given a favorable review in the

Official magazine of the Scottish Rite The New Age Magazine. The Arch-Mason N.S. Meese states, “Children attending only parochial schools grow to maturity spiritually stunted and morally illiterate and are prone to become neurotic, emotionally unbalanced, and troubled with anxiety and frustration.”17a MASONIC CONTROL OVER THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Using Oregon as an example, just as this chapter has done earlier, it can be pointed out that the Masonic talk boasting of their control over education is not to dismissed lightly. The president of the Or. State Teachers Association

Is Tom Powers, Jr. a 32 degree Mason. A Masonic flier for the public, shows Matthew Prophet the Superintendent of Portland Public Schools working with a group of four Masons. A man’s advisors can have a great influence. The 33rd degree Freemason Williard E. Givens was the Executive Secretary of the National

Education Association (NEA) for 17 years. When he resigned he took over the prestigious Education Program of the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite. 18 What has the Masonic control and influence brought our public schools? Under the disguise of the elimination of religion, they have revived the Mystery religions within our schools.

The textbooks are being written to promote controllable slaves, who have a global view and a syncretic secular or gnostic New Age outlook. Is this last paragraph an overstatement? Not in the least. Much that is going on in the classrooms, seems to be hidden or not noticed by the parents. The North American Montessori

Teachers Association (NAMTA) recognizes reincarnation. Maria Montessori the founder of the Montessori system had ties to the Theosophical Society. One of the big leaders of the Montessori system is Elizabeth Clare Prophet. Church Universal & Triumphant runs Montessori schools for all ages of children. The Montessori curriculum

Is New Age. The ideas of Hegel and John Dewey, ideas that the Illuminati have long promoted have been made the purpose of education. Hegel believed that people exist for the State, “The State is the absolute reality and the individual himself has objective existence, truth and morality

Only in his capacity as a member of the state.” John Dewey, the father of our educational system, echoed this, and it is being echoed repeatedly by educators around the country. (John Dewey was by the way an original signer of the Humanist Manifesto in 1933, this idea man is his own god. He

Is officially on the record as anti-Christian. The Humanist Manifesto I of 1933 states that a new religion must be created, and the Manifesto describes a picture of their desired New Age religion that is “synthesizing”, and for “the complete realization of human personality”, etc. ) At this point I will quote two items that

Sutton calls to our attention in America’s Secret Establishment, that are echos of Hegel and John Dewey. “It is now time for a new vision of ourselves, of man, of human nature and of human potential, and a new theory of politics and institutions premised upon that vision. What is that vision

Of Man? that the natural, whole, organismic human being is loving…that man’s basic thrust is towards community.” —Assemblyman John Vasconcellos of California, Chairman of the Joint Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education and the Education Goals Committee for the Calif. State Assembly. 19 “We are committed to the idea of Education

For Global Community. You are invited to help turn the commitment into action and mobilizing world education for development of a world community.”—National Education Association. 20 The NEA is the largest professional organization in the US, 21 and their leadership has repeatedly gone on record in favor of the

Goals of the One-World-State. “It is with…sobering awareness that we about to change the course of American education for the twenty-first century by embracing the ideals of global community, the equality and interdependence of all peoples and nations, and education as a tool to bring about world peace.”22 The book Educational

Futures: Sourcebook I states children are to receive through education “a whole variety of known quantum jumps of an evolutionary/ revolutionary nature.” 23 An example of a book advocating the New Order view is Educating for a New Millennium by Harold G. Shane. Interestingly, the present Secretary of Education Lamar Alexander wants to create public

Schools under the auspices of the occultic International Financiers through their international corporations which plan to dominate the world. In discussing this he was asked, “Would that school—or a school run by Xerox—be accountable to the public?” “Yes, because that school

Would still be public in nature. It would have to meet the same high standards, and it would be accountable to some public institution. It would be good to experiment with something like that.” 24 Masonic educators are speaking to church groups

Calming their fears about religion not being allowed in the schools. They scare the gullible Christians, “If we allow Christianity to be taught, then the Satanists will demand the right to teach Satanism.” 25 Personally, this Author would take his chance on that.

As it is, Satanism and the New Age are being taught in the schools, and New Age recruiters are using the schools as recruiting centers. This is not conjecture, ex-New Agers have revealed this systematic recruiting program is going on in the schools. And the New Order’s plans are to

Introduce Bush’s educational program—Globalism 2000, which books will be overtly New Age, and so blatantly anti-Christian that the students will be asked to denounce Christianity. Bush who borrowed Alice Bailey’s “thousand points of light” expression, uses her material as part of the Globalism 2000 curriculum. It is no coincidence, that Bush the self-proclaimed “education”

President, and admirer of Bailey, emphasises education. Alice Bailey in Externalization of the Hierarchy, (p.61) declares, “The most spiritual use now to be found in the world is the application of money to the purposes of education.” Why does education have such an overriding spiritual context? Because they are teaching

The New Order’s Spiritual systems of Gnosticism, Humanism, and the New Age in the school systems, and have been for much longer than people realize. The United States now has witches writing our curriculums. Although the same people who are secretly involved in ritual human sacrifice

Are being called upon by our government to fashion the new curriculums, the public is unaware of this. Their approach to sin (evil) is shown in a Bill Moyer’s television special in late 1988 on the subject of evil. An array of men weighted down with the big credentials of academia

Paraded their intellectual thoughts on Moyer’s special. The Biblical answer to sin, a tried and tested method that has worked millions of times wasn’t discussed. Their talk boiled down to Mankind will overcome this problem with education. As these “experts” aren’t aware of what sin is

(according to the Lord of the Universe), it’s not likely such men are ever going to solve the problem for us. Nor will the planned police state. In a new guide book that teachers are already being asked to read, Anti-Bias Curriculum Tools

For EMPOWERING Young Children, two pages are spent teaching the Educators how to dispel the image that witches are evil. According to the book, the idea that witches are evil is “so offensive, especially to many women.” The teacher is instructed to say, “What I know is that the

Real women we call witches weren’t bad. They really helped people.” The teacher is encouraged to teach halloween chants, to bring in books on witches and healers, etc. 26 If we look at just one public school in Oregon, we can see what has happened under Masonic

Direction. This school has replaced Christmas events and a Christmas party with a Winter Solstice Festival complete with Wizzards, witches, Druids, etc. The teachers in an all-teacher’s conference gather in Mandalas (the form of a Witch’s coven) and for such a meeting draw Mandalas (a form of Buddhist prayer). The

Hindu third eye is taught in the class “Math and the Mind’s Eye” —Course I & II, and in other classes as well. Christian ideas about marriage are obviously outdated, as teachers promote living together unmarried to the students, and other ideas

Of sexual promiscuity. The following holidays are to be special events- The Russian Revolution’s May Day, the Independence Day of Red China, Buddha’s birthday, Mohammad’s birthday, and several Jewish religious holidays like Yom Kippur. What is blatantly missing in this public school is anything about Christ or Christian holidays,

Such as Christmas. When one reads the new instructions to teachers, the Anti-Bias Curriculum, there is a noticable absent item, that is any concern about bias against Christianity. Devout Christians no matter what label they carry are in short suppy, and are one of the most persecuted ravaged groups. Many sincere believers in Jesus Christ,

Must suffer indignities from the hands of those who only pretend to be Christians. It seems to me to be very biased to remove Christmas celebrations and replace them with Druids and Witches, such as has been done in the school refered to in the proceeding paragraph. This

Author is aware of other reported events in schools across this country which displayed the same hate for Christianity and esteem for the pagan mystery religions, and its all done under the disguise of religious freedom. This is actually according to the NEA’s plans.

Samuel Blumenfeld’s book NEA: Trojan Horse In American Education does a full blown expose on how the NEA has planned to create illiteracy along with the Socialist One-World- Nation they are helping establish. Another of his books exposes how the private schools were functioning fine in America before public

Schools began to predominate, and how they were supplanted by the actions of those opposed to God with the purpose of destroying religious values. Another example, students being expelled for talking on their own time about after school Bible Studies, while their particular school had Satanic posters in the library. Incredible, yes but

True. You will not find the Masons running campaigns against Satanism and the Mystery Religions entering our schools, like they did against Christianity. When Christians have called the ACLU to get support for legal action against the introduction of the religion of Satanism into

Their School system, the ACLU was not in the least interested. The mask has come off, the leaders of the Masons and the ACLU are not interested in religious freedom, they have been interested in the systematic destruction of Christianity, and its prostitution to serve their goals

Toward a One-World-State. In the gifted school program, the classes being given for our most gifted children, they are introducing them to the mystery religions on school time by what they call “Phantasy Games Class.” In American PE classes they have the children chanting mantras (a form of Hindu prayer.) 27

Many of the modern educational ideas within such a school are not even be realized by the general public as occultic. People get very defensive when one explains that psychology, which is considered a science, is but based on the occultic direction that Freud and Jung gave.

Jung is openly recognized by occultists like the Rosicrucians as having been an illumined mind.28 Freud was a drug addict. Jung got his information from a “spirit guide.”(What Christian’s call a demon.) Jung was into mandalas. Jung wrote a foreward to the book The I Ching. Jung was into astrology.

He wrote a commentary on The Tibetan Book of the Dead. He says that “to it I owe not only many stimulating ideas and discoveries but also many fundamental insights.”29 This great Jewish mystic Jung, an associate of Freud, gave us much of the foundation of modern psychology.

Leaders of the religion of psychology such as Maslow, Rogers, and Fromm all took their “trip East” into occultism. 30 Those who are associated with the Theosophical Society, for instance, would be aware of Jung occultic connections, because the Society’s catolog of Quest books advertises Jung and the Lost Gospels, Jungian Synchronicity in Astrological

Signs and Ages, and Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons of the Dead. IT IS NO ACCIDENT THAT THE N.E.A.’S MAGAZINE HAS THE UP-SIDE DOWN SATANIC PENTAGRAM ON THEIR COVER. THE LEADERSHIP OF THE N.E.A. IS INTO WITCHCRAFT AND HAS PAID JANET JONES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF

$10,000 TO INVESTIGATE CHRISTIANITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESTROYING IT. Worse yet, Psychology and Psychiatry have repeatedly proved to be of little value, if they were tested like drugs for Food & Drug Administration approval, they would be banned. This is not

My opinion alone, but rather many psychologists are aware of failure of psychology. 31 Ancient Empires of the New Age gives the following good chart that compares the religion of Psychology to the religion of the New Age. 32 It is not by accident that the two are very close. NEW AGE PSYCHOLOGY

THOU ART GOD. THOU ART GOOD. YOU MUST REALIZE YOU MUST REALIZE THAT YOU ARE GOD. THAT YOU ARE GOOD. WHEN YOU KNOW YOU WHEN YOU KNOW YOU ARE GOD, THEN YOU ARE GOOD, THEN YOU WILL BE GOD. WILL BE GOOD.

IN THE PROPER ENVI- IN THE PROPER ENVI- RONMENT, YOUR INNER RONMENT, YOUR INNER SELF WILL NATURALLY SELF WILL NATURALLY LEAD YOU TO BE GOD. LEAD YOU TO BE GOOD. THE NEW WORLD ORDER’S PUBLIC EDUCATION A prominant figure in the creation of the public school system (and its secular ways) was the

Mason DeWitt Clinton (1769-1828) of NY. Some consider him the father of the system. In began to establish the system while he was mayor of New York after 1802. Another pioneer in the idea of public education was Horace Mann, a Unitarian in Mass., and also possibly

A Mason, in 1837. Up to that time education had been private, with parents sending their children to the parochial or private school of their choice. Mann had the school books rewritten to exclude all references to God or the Bible. Consequently, valuable cultural knowledge has been never been taught in the public schools,

So that students could understand much of the religious thought the underlies so much of Western History. Further, the first three great spiritual awakenings which pored over this nation with such profound effect are not even mentioned, even though their historical impact should not be ignored. The first spiritual awakening led

To the founding of six of the nine colonial colleges. The third prior to the Amer. Civil War was part of a profound new revival that led people to realize the institution of slavery was evil. “PUBLIC” SCHOOLS DID MORE THAN JUST ELIMINATING CHRISTIANITY

The people who gave us “public” education did more than just eliminate Christianity from the curriculum. They set out to give us their sanitized version of history. History was rewritten in order to hide incidents that would expose their long standing conspiracy to rule not just the United States, but the world. The profound

Masonic influence on “public” education can’t readily be seen, because they are a secretive organization. This Author would like to have the space and time here to expose how public education and our history have long been under the One-World-Power, but it simply is beyond the scope of this book. Others, like Antony Sutton, have

Laid some groundwork in understanding their control. In his blockbuster America’s Secret Establishment, he has an excellent chapter on how the Order has influenced education. They established the American Historical Association. Rockefeller has pumped millions of dollars into a an ongoing campaign to keep the history books written as they want them to be.

The Rockefeller Foundation admits in their Annual Report, 1946, p.188, that they are subsidizing corps of historians to prevent anyone from rewriting history. Under the supervision of Mason administrators, and others that cooperate with the New World Order, the New Age movement has done considerable

Indoctrination already in the public schools. The author knows first hand details on this. Perhaps one of the most important cover-ups is of their total control of our governmental functions. In order to do this, they have shamelessly rewritten the history books. They have not

Had to destroy documentation, the American public are so sheep-like that the evidence exposing their historical perversions lay just beneath the surface for anyone to discover. Hold onto your chair. You are going to read items that may make you very angry. Your anger may be directed at this Author for attacking

Some of the myths of history that you will not comfortly want to discard. Many Christians will become embittered because they want to believe in such myths as George Washington was a great Christian. They need to understand that these myths are perpetuated by the system to cover what has historically happened. For instance, many

Almanacs and history books record Nixon as a Quaker. What a distortion of the truth. These smokescreens effectively hide from the Public’s view the enormous centralized power of the New Order. Their power is such that the results of major elections are preordained. Every four years an expensive ritualistic fraud is perpetrated

On the American public, as the people fool themselves that they select and self-govern themselves. At this point, this Author won’t prove that item to you, it is a statement of fact, but you can disbelieve it if you want. What this Author would like

To do is to go back to the start of this nation. Let’s go back to the beginning so to speak. It is important to distort U.S. history from the very beginning, because from there most of us take off on the wrong track. This Author is

Going to ask the reader to check out these items about the Amer. Revolution for himself. Good American historians know the truth of what I am writing you, the information just never filters down to the common person. (Likewise, Masonic historians know of the Masonic involvement in history. They brag about their involvement to themselves,

But the information doesn’t filter down to the common person.) This Author wishes he had a dollar for everytime he had seen a cartoon, or sitcom, or other media show that represents the Boston Tea Party as an attack against high taxes.

The Boston Tea Party is a favorite of their distortions. The Boston Tea Party is believed by most Americans to have been an act of defiance against a high Tea Tax. Actually, the Tea Tax Act had cut taxes in half. So why would the colonials become angry at a law that reduced

Taxes in half? The Masons who planned the Boston Tea Party in a Masonic Lodge were smuggling illegal tea. The reduced tax on legitimate tea (making legal tea more competitively priced) would cut into their profits of their illegal smuggling operation. Many, but not all of the men dressed

As Indians, in the Boston Tea Party were Masons. It was greed and lack of respect for the law that motivated their criminal act. To quote one history book, “Colonial trade would be controlled more strictly than ever before. British soldiers would be stationed in great numbers and live among the colonists. New

Taxes would draw money from the colonies to the mother country.” What a great distortion of history. It sounds like the poor Americans were being made to pay for their own oppression, and to surrender their homes to the British Army. It is difficult to learn from our history books, that the real reason

The British Army came was to protect the frontier after Pontiac’s rebellion. The British people were already paying higher taxes than the Americans and were having to bear most of the cost of defending the American colonies. The colonists were given the chance to propose alternatives before

The taxes were passed, but they did not have any other solutions. One textbook states, “Franklin and other agents from other colonies tried to persuade Grenville not to have the Stamp Act passed.” Actually, these representatives of the colonies were as surprised as the British government by the negative American reaction. It served an excellent

Purpose to allow what appeared to be an innocent law to pass. The negative reaction was part of an orchestrated secret effort by the Masons in both England and America to create an atmosphere of tension. They were working hard to get others involved.

The British did ask that Americans (remember Americans then were British citizens) to house British troops. That was a practice that all of the entire British empire had to cooperate with. The conditions in those days, not only encouraged it, but almost demanded it. They did not have nail

Guns, and prefab military barracks in those days. With the housing and building situation in the colonies it was obviously the best solution, and most colonists did not object. (Actually, most British troops prior to the Revolution went to the British West Indies. During the Amer.

Revolution the British kept a large military presence there against Spain and France, including large Naval forces because the West Indies were to many British strategists more valuable to protect.) But isn’t this making it sound like there wasn’t any reason for a revolution? Wait, we’re not finished yet.

Before we look at why the Revolution happened, imagine what would have happened if it hadn’t—the United States would be like the American colonies that didn’t revolt—like Canada and the Bahamas. We might even be like Great Britain. If one examines the same textbooks that

Portray the British as villians in the Revolutionary War, when these textbooks get to W.W. I and II, they portray Great Britian as a great democracy. We entered those wars, we were told, to save democracy. If Canada and Britian can be heralded

As such great democracies now, and have the same government system as they did back then, why did we need a revolution for “Freedom”? The truth is we didn’t. We needed a revolution for “independence”, but not for freedom. For instance, King George (whose character

Is grossly misdrawn in Amer. history books) righteously created a Proclamation line to protect the Indians from the encroachment of the frontiermen. Many white men did not know how to respect treaties with the Indians. The primary reason the frontiermen were in favor of the revolution was so they could steal the Indian’s land.

Again if the history books mention this, they often twist the facts ever so slightly to create a false impression. They make it seem like the Proclamation was irreversable. The Proclamation of 1763 was an excellent way to quell Indian trouble on the border. However, the textbooks falsely portray it

As an irreversible act. It could repeatedly come up for reconsideration in 5 to 7 year periods. Scholars have trashed the propoganda image of King George as a tyrant, although the textbooks haven’t. If people want a tyrant King George, they have one in George Bush. The American King

George has promoted drug smuggling through the CIA, etc. so that he can wage a trumped up war against drugs as a cover to take away our liberties, in step with the New World Order’s plans. Some textbooks try to portray the British as evil because they used the Indians as allies. Now

Why did the Indians want to fight for the King? Could it be he treated them better than the rough land hungry frontiersmen? Historians gloss over American colonial attempts to coax the Indians to fight on their side. The Revolutionary War’s causes were complex.

However, the American textbooks purposely distort the facts. Events are rarely described in the context that they occured in. For instance, the events of the Revolutionary War occured in colonies that had had rules and regulations like the ones supposedly rebelled against for centuries (ever since their foundings). Britian was trying to

Govern a world empire, and did not single out the Americans for abuse. Few writers portray what British colonial policy was, and what it was not. Its like hearing one side of the story. But because the American side of the story

Is very weak, (weak because it was a manipulated conflict, like the Vietnam War), the American textbooks like to portray the colonists as universally against Britian. The Amer. Revolutionary War wasn’t any more popular than the Vietnam War. Two thirds of the people in the

13 colonies were not in favor of it. One third of the colonists fought on the British side, and one third decided wisely just to stay neutral and mind their own business. The northern colonies (now Canada) completely rejected the revolution. If it hadn’t been for Masonic connections

In the French government who finally intervened to bring France and Spain into the war, the Americans might never have won. The fact is Yorktown was a defeat but not a decisive military defeat. Two large British armies remained in the field,

And the large cities were secure in their control. The book the Temple and the Lodge is the first book this Author is aware of, which goes into the historical details of how the British Generals who were Masons, contributed to the American victory. The victory was not so much won by

The colonists, as it was given them by lack of British enthusiasm. Patrick Henry’s speech to the Virginia House, Ethan Allen’s famous phrase “in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress, are two of the pure myths that are told about these

Men. What was written by Thomas Paine as political propoganda, his Common Sense, is taken by some as the gospel truth. The Freemason and itinerant whose name was Mason Locke Weems (1760-1825) was according to Masonic and other sources the man who invented the George

Washington and the Cherry Tree story. Let us be historically accurate. The Boston Massacre was not like the American textbook image. What happened was typical of what has happened whenever troops are doing police work, and are being abused by a crowd. By the most accurate accounts, what happened was that

After throwing rocks, oster shells, and abuse at the soldiers someone in the mob yelled a taunting “fire”, and the soldiers (as soldiers obediently and automaticaly do under attack) fired. This is not to justify the soldiers, but perhaps it will dispel the myth that this unfortunate

Incident was the result of a policy of oppression. It does show that history repeats itself under similar circumstances (Kent State to name just one of many failures of soldiers to be police). If this seems unfairly Pro-British, let me point out that many leading colonial leaders of the

Future Amer. Revolution were sympathetic to the soldiers side and not the mob’s. John Adams, future U.S. President, along with another famous future Revolutionist defended the soldiers in court. If the myth of the textbooks are right that it was British colonial oppression that caused the “Boston massacre”, I would suggest that their

Authors should, to be consistent, advocate another revolution since Kent State. Towns and cities where Masonic Lodges existed during the American Revolutionary War period from 1775 to 1789 are indicated on the map. Because the colonists in Washington’s army came from different colonies, Washington used the Masonic lodge to wield his

Troops into a closer knit body of men. Military lodges were very numerous within the multitude of types of troops engaged. The book Temple and the Lodge tells the story of how the British Mason Generals followed orders, but showed little initiative in actually defeating the colonists.

The Revolution was basically a Masonic show, with most of the Revolutionists ‘ initiatives and directives coming from Masons. To argue that Masons were on both sides, therefore they could not have been the initiators of the war, is as ludicrous as arguing that the Vietnamese were on both sides

Of the Vietnam war therefore the Vietnamese didn’t initiate and plan it. The Vietnamese began their war even during W.W. II, and the Masons began their revolutionary planning even before Nathaniel Bacon, who the New Age Magazine (Apr. ’64, p.43) calls “a great lover of freedom.”

Because Christian views have been relegated to the trash heap, we don’t hear the rational voices of great Christian leaders of that American Revolutionary time period who suggested peace, proper obedience to authority, and that greed is evil. It is true that there were disagreements on how things should be done, between the colonists

And Britian. There are major disagreements between Alaska and Washington,D.C. on how Alaska should be run. One poll showed a majority of Alaskans in favor of sucession. How would most American’s feel if Alaska left the U.S.? The goal of Illumined Masonry was to destroy

All monarchies. To directly attack the institutions of Monarchies in various nations was difficult, because the only model the people had was to reestablish another monarchy. The United States was designed as their model, upon which the French and other revolutions would draw upon. There are numerous hints that Great

Britain and the United States were from the time of the Revolution, intended to become the seat of world power. The Monroe Doctrine actually was not to protect the Americas, but in actual practice, protected the British American Empire. For instance, the establishment of British claims

To Islas Malvinas were not contested by the U.S. According to Prof. Quigley, the force that backed up the Monroe Doctrine until W.W. II was the British navy. The sucess of the American Revolution was helped by the support of certain churches. Certain

Ministers, such as Isaac Backus, the leader of New England Seperatist Baptists, and their inflamatory sermons did more to help create revolutionary fervor, than some of the other items indicated in the textbooks. Whether one chooses to call this “Christian” support or not, it was an

Important factor. The narrow meaning of Christian is Christ-like, and supporting war is not Christ-like. This does not remove the divine aspect to the creation of the United States. It just means God did not call for men to kill each other. Although the idea that the United States was

Created a Christian nation is often based on shoddy history and myth, that does not mean that God wasn’t involved in its birth and history. Because the Christian, religious and spiritual side of history is blacked out of the system’s approved history, it is difficult for people

To appreciate the great role the United States has really played in the spiritual affairs of the world. The United States through its people have been part of God’s plan for victory. According to Scripture, God has permitted all of this to happen, no matter what the surface appearance, it is

His conditional will. Nor has American simply been an evil nation. In some parts of the world, where the American government is hated, Americans are still loved, because foreignors appreciate the American people. The God of the Bible can use the American people. He has indicated in his Word that a

Purifying fire is used to refine his people. Judgement begins at the House of God. The American Christians, if refined like Uranium to get the isotope 235, can be as powerful in God’s hands, as refined Uranium in a nuclear bomb. Because God wants to do great things with America,

It is to be expected that a great purifying fire will be allowed. Communism was turned by God into his instrument of purification. Why does he do such a thing? I’m sure if people would repent, he could work with less drastic measures. But the American Christians are largely deaf to calls for

Repentence, they are insisting on stronger measures. The Christian view of history will be one where the power of God is seen manifesting itself along side the free will of man. God is attracting mankind to him, without coersion. He also has set in motion events that will

Result according to the Bible in victory for Good and for God. Therefore, it is proper for Christians to see God’s presence at work during the American Revolution. However, let the historical chips fall where they will, the American Revolution was an act of disobedience to a legitimate

Authority, and was planned and directed largely by Masons. When a textbook writes, “THE COLONIES WIN THEIR FREEDOM”, it paints an illusion. The people in Canada and Great Britian did not rebel against authority, throw someone else’s cargo of tea in the sea, and they are heralded today as great bastions of democracy

And freedom. Christ stated that true freedom is the freedom from sin he alone can bring. Christians need to return to Christ’s teachings when they attribute freedom to any other source but Him alone. How many observors of drug addicts realize that living in the United States is not a guarantee

Of freedom, living in Christ is. (In a few years, the New World Order will unintentionaly teach Christians this lesson.—Author’s opinion) ANOTHER SAMPLE FOR HISTORY LOVERS Perhaps I can indulge the reader with one more sampling of history that he or she will not read

In the textbooks. This following information comes from my manuscript/research notes for a book which, like this one, I did extensive research and work on, but has never been published. The reader can skip over this part if he is not interested in how the history books are inadequate.

What I will be demonstrating is just one area of history of many that the facts and events of history are not being taught. These facts may seem trivial, however after this next example from history, we will discuss why these seemingly trivial facts are important.

The part of history I want to draw your attention to concerns the Czar of Russia and his willingness to help save the United States during the Civil War. The Czar of Russia was aware of European interests (the International Banking

House of the Rothschilds) to split the United States into two countries. The Czar moved his Pacific fleet to San Francisco to protect the United States. This is easy to state, but the significance of the Czar’s move must be lost to most readers because the history books have to a great

Extent not only ignored his help, but also the crucial role the Far Western United States played in the Civil War. The far west at that time consisted of the states of California and Oregon with the rest of the continental U.S. having territorial governments. The statehood of Nevada was rushed

Through by the Lincoln administration for political motives during the war in 1864. The important part the West had in the outcome of the American Civil War has been by and large ignored. This may be due to the bias that the Eastern establishment has for concentrating

On events in the East. Most Civil War historians have concentrated their efforts on the East, even when they speak of the “West” in their books, they refer to the mid-west rather than the far west. Further, the establishment historians do their best to avoid topics that would expose the

Machinations of the Rothschilds and the real politics behind wars and events. Let us see the details of how protecting San Francisco and California could have saved the Union, and prevented a Southern victory, and examine this help of the Czar’s fleet to the U.S. that was celebrated in California during the war.

Prior to the Civil War, men like the Rothschilds in Europe schemed to bring the U.S. under their economic dominion. The discovery of gold in California, and precious metals throughout the entire western United States helped bolster the United States economically, which in turn

Helped the U.S. stand on its on two feet against the Europeans. The Rothschilds were not the only ones to see how important the gold and silver fields were. On Jan. 19, 1861 while the South was still in the early stages of seceding from the Union, before a Confederate government

Had even been formed in Montgomery, AL, Lincoln’s government in Washington,D.C. found out that a rebel expedition was waiting in Mexico to capture the California gold steamer that sailed from San Francisco to Panama with the gold that the western U.S. produced.

The vast amounts of California gold and silver were shipped on gold steamers that ran from San Francisco to Panama. During the Civil War these precious metals were the real money that kept the United States government going. The Comstock Lode’s value to the U.S. during the war

Was 52 million dollars (dollars values according to the 1860 values). Idaho’s mines provided Lincoln with 114 million dollars. Colorado mines furnished another $52 million. In all the United States’ federal government spent $5,000 million to fight the Civil War, which was about the amount of the whole country’s gross national

Product in 1860. U.S. Greenbacks were printed which lost most of their value compared to real money (gold and silver coins.) Further, California raised much money privately for the war, along with providing 16,000 U.S. troops, a good number of which were transported

To the east. On Sept. 19, 1862 Californians donated $100,000 in gold for the war, and two months later an equal amount was sent east to relieve the sick and wounded. Of a total of $5 million collected for the troops by the Sanitary Fund in the North, one-fifth was donated by

Californians. A sack of flour which Californians enjoyed selling and reselling to raise money for the war, grossed $275,000 in returns for the war effort. In the Pacific, the grand american whaling monopoly brought home an annual average catch worth 8 million dollars. The 70 Pacific whaling

Ships sunk by the Confederates in the Pacific hastened the demise of the whaling industry already hurt by the discovery of oil petroleum in 1859. Further, California served as America’s outlet for trade to the Far East. CONFEDERATE ASSETS

At first glance it might seem that the Confederacy had no assets to threaten the West. Actually, the reverse might be stated, the U.S. had little assets to defend the vast land mass of western United States and the Pacific. Over 1 million

Square miles of land in the west in 1860 were divided up into 5 military departments, TX, N.M., UT, OR, and CA. The Secretary of War reported that on June 20, 1860 12,984 federal troops were stationed in the west. Most were withdrawn east and replaced with new recruits,

The majority of which came from California. The gold steamers were vulnerable like a child with candy, the U.S. Pacific fleet consisted of only a few ships. VULNERABLE PROBLEM SPOTS In 1860, the British had moved thousands of troops and naval forces to British Columbia. During the Civil War, there were periods when

It was uncertain whether Britian would stay neutral or help the South. South of California, France moved troops into Mexico and took over. The French cooperated with the Confederacy. The French and Confederates even conducted several joint military operations. The Confederates established (military) recruiting stations along

The U.S.- Mexican border south of California and Arizona, which federal troops during the war led several expeditions to shut down. The Mexican population in California were not loyal to the U.S. government, because their lands had been stolen by Americans during the gold rush, and their age old titles to the land ignored by

The American legal system. Remember, that California had been captured recently from Mexico during the Mexican War. Utah was settled by Mormons, who at the time were in a state of hostility toward the U.S. government. U.S. troops had to be stationed in Utah throughout the war. Earlier the Mormons had successfully engaged army troops.

The Indian tribes in the Western territories and Oregon were itching to fight. During the war, southern agents would visit most of the Western tribes to encourage them to go to war. On September 10, 1861 orders were found on dead confederates at the Quapaw Agency revealing the south’s intentions to

Enlist the Plains Indians. This was just one of many incidents where Confederate agents taking weapons and encouragement to the Plains Indians were discovered. Another essentially unknown incident along this line was when 22 Confederate officers on their way to incite the Plains Indians to rebel were caught on the Verdigras River in

Kansas and wiped out. Because of the vulnerability of the U.S. forces, Confederate military aid, and many other factors coming together many of the civilized and the wild Indians attacked the US Army during the Civil War. Some tribes were directly recruited into the Confederate Army. The Choctaw, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Creek,

Seminoles, and some Apaches joined the Confederate Army. The Apaches, Arapaho, Cheyenne, Kiowa, Sioux, Snakes, Shoshones, Madocs, Black Kettle and Satanta went to war with the U.S. Army on their own. They were greatly outmatched. The civilian population of the west consisted of many foreignors and southernors so that although the majority

Of the western population were unsympathetic to the idea of southern secession, they also had little interest in fighting against the South. California was the most loyal U.S. area, and it harbored powerful latent desires to form its own country and had some strong pro-Southern districts, especially in southern California.

Considering the circumstances just presented, it is easy to see how naval and land forces of the Confederacy could have possibly 1. captured the gold steamers, 2. captured and sucessfully governed parts of the West. It was also possible that French and British forces had they entered the war could have taken the Pacific region.

France and Britian were already under the influence of the Rothschilds and had strong Masonic governments in place. The key point in California was San Francisco harbor, which carried on a large amount of commercial activity. Pro-Union Californians were very thankful when the Russian Pacific fleet made San Francisco their home base. The Russian

Fleet had instructions to engage in war to protect San Francisco if the occasion called for it. Besides the Russian Fleet, the U.S. iron clad Camanche made it to San Francisco which after sinking and being raised by divers was finally

Launched in late 1864 and put into service in May, 1865. Troops occupied Santa Catalina island to prevent the South from using its good harbor. Ft. Stevens was built to guard the Columbia River. CONFEDERATE NAVAL EFFORTS IN THE PACIFIC Numerous confederate plans were made to outfit

Ships in the Pacific into warships to capture the gold steamers, but most never got beyond the planning stages. U.S. government officials stopped several, and British officials stopped several attempts in Victoria, B.C. One attempt to seize the U.S. revenue cutter Shubrick was stopped before it reached Port Townsend. Two

Attempts by groups of confederates wearing civilian clothes to hijack the gold steamers failed. The Confederates did manage to outfit one small schooner into a warship, the J.M. Chapman, but it was seized by an American warship in San Francisco harbor before it could do any harm.

The fear of the confederate CSS Alabama never developed into a real threat. Another confederate raider the CSS Shenandoah however was a serious threat in the Pacific. The Shenandoah was moving to attack San Francisco when it learned in July, 1865 that the war was over. The Official Records of the Union and

Confederate Armies are full of dozens of reports concerning confederate privateers in the Pacific. The threats of any substance have already been mentioned. CONFEDERATE ARMY EFFORTS IN THE FAR WEST One third of California was estimated to be pro-South. Two secret organizations, the Knights

Of the Goldern Circle and the Knights of the Columbia Star, were loyal to the South. Their California numbers were estimated at over 20,000 for the first group and 30,000 for the second. Their presence in California required US troops to guard important locations throughout the state.

The Knights drilled and schemed. Their big plans always failed, such as to take over the mint and the San Francisco arsenal. In Oregon, they schemed to take over the capital Salem and Fort Vancouver in WA. Their biggest plans, for which they collected arms and drew up plans

For was the conquest of California in 1865 in conjunction with Confederate troops which were heading for California from Texas. The offensive was in its early stages in western Texas when the war ended. The 1865 offensive was to follow in part the

Route of the 1861-62 Confederate offensive which had taken over most of Arizona and New Mexico. Troops from California ran into the Southernors near the Pima Villiages (in what’s today Ariz.) and drove the Confederates out of Arizona back into Texas. The Confederate offensive failed in large measure due to the antipathy

Of the Hispanic population in New Mexico to Texans. The 1862 invasion was not seen by the locals in the context of North vs. South but Texans vs. Hispanics and the New Mexican population rather than help the Confederates opposed the Texas Units. If the Confederate Trans-

Mississippi War Dept. had been able to shift Confederate troops from another state to carry out the attack it may well have gotten the popular support it needed in New Mexico. Volunteer troops from Colorado played the major role in defeating the confederate forces in the “Gettysburg” of the West at Glorieta and Apache

Pass. The Texas Rangers were incorporated into the Confederate Army. A group of 42 Confederate led by a Texas Ranger that were moving through Colorado 200 miles SE of Denver were captured in Sept. 1861. In 1862, 7 Confederate officers that went to Colorado to recruit a

Southern regiment were wiped out by Osage Indians working with Federal troops. Although basically under Federal control the Wild West was indeed still a wild place, and it was vulnerable to southern activity. WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS INFORMATION In summarizing this little report on the Civil

War, the purpose of the report was to illustrate further the inadequacy of modern history textbooks. The worst are at the lower levels. As the student progresses the textbooks get a little better, but for the student “as the twig is bent so it

Grows”. His or her frame of reference is warped from the start so that even if the young person encounters facts exposing the Power’s conspiracy there is no way to assimilate it. We just discussed a very important aspect of the Civil War which involved the Rothschilds, the Czar, and the Confederate/European threat to California

And the financial capability of the U.S. to wage war which is ignored by the textbooks. In itself it simply a small portion of human history, and a collection of what may seem to be trivial facts. However, let me explain how this affects you and I. First, the Power’s establishment removed God

And the Lord’s spiritual dimension from history. Next, they removed all realistic analysis of events, so that things became random events. For instance, why did the Indians revolt? Random events. Why did the Czar sent his fleet? a random event. They most likely are not going to directly

Tell us they are random events, they simply don’t give us any real analysis, and allow us to assume they are random events. History just happens we are led to believe. Politicians and other leaders are simply trying to guide events like riding

A bucking bronco. The U.S. just stumbled into war. It was only an accident that some men made millions off the Civil War, and that they just happened to be ready to profit from it. Event A has no connection to Event B. Lastly, after taking away analysis of why and how events happen,

They have begun taking away facts. Without facts we will not be able to make proper analysis, without any analysis, we will not know where we have been or where we are really going, and finally without God we have no hope. They have us where they want us.

This Author has observed today’s history classes. Today it is popular to have the students spend their period chattering their opinions on history. However, without facts all their discussions do is to reinforce ignorance. Students are being told facts are dry, and useless; and facts are, without analysis. When I was invited

To a history class to speak on the Civil War the students were very interested to learn that contrary to the Constitution we have paper money, and that being issued not by Congress but by a private bank. This was proof to me that with analysis

Showing people how they are participants in a Conspiracy directed against them history comes alive. 1. The Oregon Voter, Portland, OR, July 15, 1922, p. 34f. 2. See the Catholic Civic Rights Association booklet “Twenty-Four Reasons Why You Should Vote Official Ballot 315, ‘No'”. There is also a mimeographed form which contains an

Oath that the signatory was a signer of the petition and had been misled by those gathering signatures for the petition. These sheets were circulated by the Lutheran Schools Committee and they received some signatures from people who felt they’d been deceived. 3. Ibid. 4. Nitz, Carl F. (unpublished paper) “The Compulsary Education Bill”,p.8f

5. The Official Affirmative Argument in Proposed Constitutional Amendments and Measures, 1922, p.23. 6. Paid ad appearing in a number of Oregon newspapers in 1922. 7. Ad paid for by Malcom, 33 degree, Masonic Inspector-General in Oregon. 8. The Freemasons have had a goal of a One-World-State

From their inception. The following three quotes are from 3 different times and are a sampling of the type of anti-national statements Masons have uttered. 1848- “The Republic exists in Freemasonry. If the Republic does as the Freemasons have done,

It will become the glowing pledge of union with all men, in all parts of the globe, and on all sides of our triangle.” (Jewish Mason Adolphe Isaac Cremieux as recorded in Di Gargans, Michael. Irish and English Freemasons and their Foreign Brothers, p. 55) 1929- Freemasonry—”Whence and Whither?”

“Has Freemasonry, then, a spiritual conception only? Is its objective but the solidifying into a beautiful Utopia the wonderful Infinity of the First Cause and the kaleidoscopic finiteness of its mortal, human creatures? Is its mission solely directed to the establishment of the long-heralded

And hoped-for Kingdom of the Brotherhood of Man?…The Masonic Order is held to be the greatest force of constructive initiative in existence, “(The New Age, Sept., 1929, p.549.) “Studying the League of Nations under its different aspects we are led to draw the logical conclusion that it is a Judeo-Masonic achievment.”

(Miller, Edith S., op. cit., p.640) 9. Nitz, op. cit., p.7. 10. The Daily Journal, Portland, OR., June 16,1922; The Torch, Valparaiso, Ind., July 15, 1922. 11. Roberts, Allen E. Freemasonry in History. Richmond, VA.: Macoy Publishing & Masonic Supply Co.,1985, p.261. 12. Author’s research. 13. Confidential source.

14. Oregonian, March 17, 1991, Sunrise ed. front page, and p.A26. 15. ibid. p. A1. 16. Basic American Ideals. Washington, D.C.: The Supreme Council 33 Degree A & A Scottish Rite of Freemasonry Southern Juris., 1967, p.41. 17. ibid.,pp. 33-35. 17a. The New Age, June 1962, p.54. 18. See Wright, Erminie King. The Public School

Monopoly. 19. Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment, p. 104 quoting Rex Myles, Brotherhood and Darkness, p. 347. 20. “A Declaration Of Interdependence: Education For a Global Community,” A Summary Report of the NEA Bicentennial Program (June 26, 1976), Wash.D.C: NEA. 21. NEA Fact Sheet quoted in Education For a New World Order by Michael Llyod Chadwick,

Ed., Freeman Digest, 9/1978, p. 1 22. A Summary Report of the NEA Bicentennial Program (June 26, 1976) 23. Kierstead, Fred, Jim Bowman & Christopher Dede, Education Futures: Sourcebook I. Wash. D.C.: World Future Soc, 1979, p.3. 24. “Meet Lamar Alexander”, NEA Today (May/June 1991) Wash. D.C.: NEA, p. 9.

25. Author’s notes. 26. Dermen-Sparks, Louise and the A.B.C. Task Force. Anti-Bias Curriculum; Tools for EMPOWERING Young Children. Wash. D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1989, pp. 90-91. 27. Video “Gods of the New Age” showed a clip of a gifted class and PE classes involved in these pagan religious activities.

28. “The Mysticism of Carl Jung”, The Rosicrucian Digest (July, 1970), San Jose.CA: Supreme Grand Lodge of AMORC, pp. 269-270. 29. ibid. 30. DeParre, Paul. Ancient Empires of the New Age, p. 28 31. A Psyc. Instructor of this Author expressed this. Ancient Empires of the New Age, p. 30

Also mentions this and gives secular and Christian sources that are also saying this. 32. De Parre. Op Cit., p. 29. 33. Denslow, 10,000 Famous Freemasons, Vol. IV, p. 307. For a non-Masonic source see also Wallechinsky, The People’s Almanac, p. 113. 34. Quigley, Carroll. Tragedy and Hope. NY:

The Macmillan Co., 1966, p. 68. BOOKS RECOMMENDED FOR FURTHER STUDY: Like Lambs to the Slaughter by Johanna Michaelsen. Johanna has an exceptionally good grasp of what is happening. She brings together her personal knowledge along with excellent research to expose what horrible items are in store

For children should the occult movement carry out their plans. She exposes Saturday morning cartoons, New Age games like Dungeon and Dragons and what is happening in the classrooms, just to name a few examples. The Unseen Hand by Ralph Epperson. This is an historical introduction to the Conspiratorial

View of History. Ralph is succinct and covers a lot of territory in his book. Of the various books that attempt to introduce people to history and how the Conspiracy has been involved in history this is the best this Author has seen.

source