In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, Amen. We fly to your protection, Holy Mother of God, do not despise our requests in our needs, but always deliver us from all evil adventures, O glorious and blessed Virgin. O our Lady, our Advocate, our Mediatrix, our Comforter.
Reconcile us with Your Son, commend us to Your Son, hand us over to Your Son. Seat of Wisdom, pray for us. In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, Amen
God bless you, thank you very much for inviting me again. It is with great joy that I come to Chełm to discuss another important topic, the heresy of modernism. We hear a lot about it, about modernism, many people refer to it, many people deny it.
Therefore, it is even more important to systematically understand what it is and where it comes from. At the very beginning, I would like to discuss some background on the emergence of the heresy of modernism.
The origin of this heesy was the beginning of the 19th century, when the struggle between two directions of thought intensified. Between Catholic thought and the other, i.e. liberal thought, which arose As we well know, under the influence of the French Revolution, on the one hand,
The church stood firmly by its principles, and on the other hand, there was liberalism, which was constantly changing, transforming into some new forms and new statements, that is, its constant feature. there is variability and, of course, people began to appear who wanted to reconcile both
Directions, i.e. to be Catholics all the time and, on the other hand, to be liberals at the same time, and some even began to demand certain concessions from the Church in these fundamental matters. Where the Church was very categorical, due to its activities, they began to introduce more and more confusion
Especially when it comes to understanding such basic concepts and, of course, defending the deposit of faith required the church to combat various extreme deviations, one of them was understood at that time completely differently than today, traditionalism which then meant an attitude that denied human reason the ability to learn religious and
Moral truths And they considered revelation to be the only source of these truths, and the Holy See spoke out several times against this condemnation of the laws of reason and condemned this attitude. Of traditionalism understood in this way,
We see that the meaning of this term is completely different than that of today, and the opposite was believed by the rationalists who proclaimed that human reason itself is completely it is enough to prove but also to understand all, even the most secret mysteries of faith, and it was these errors that Pope
Gregory XV and Pope Pius II also warned against. Even though the approach of Christian rationalists was condemned, unfortunately they were not forgotten. And even on the contrary, under the influence of thought. philosophical theories which originate mainly from Kant, continued to live among theologians and even had their
Supporters among professors of Catholic universities. And it was there that they were really adapted to modern philosophical and psychological concepts and further. Recognizing them as the flowering of human thought in the field of religion, they began to attack the power of the Church. who unwaveringly
Guarded religion and the purity of faith, that they do not understand the spirit of the times and do not understand modern culture, we see that even today the same accusations are still made against what is still traditional in the church, that
It is not adapted to the spirit of the times and precisely these progressive ideas, ideas of change and separation from what is supernatural were called modernism, and they actually touched everything, all areas of thought and church life, that is, they touched philosophy and theology, and even the
Church discipline of modernist philosophy, maybe this is one of the more difficult aspects of this heresy, but it is indeed important to explain it, they dealt with internal phenomena, i.e. they claimed that reason is not able to prove the existence of God because according to them, the source of religion are
Religious feelings that are common to all people and which unconsciously reside in every person, therefore it is in the content and the nature of each religion, in fact, they saw different degrees but the development of the same religious feeling, so even Christianity became like that
In fact, it was a certain natural phenomenon because it was only a manifestation of Christ’s religious self-knowledge. In this case, in such a perspective, everything that the church preached completely changed its characteristics and even its meaning because, above all , it lost the value of truth. example, in this approach, they become only
A statement by the church of concepts evoked by this religious feeling, sacraments only symbols that are supposed to affect the senses, and the Holy Scripture also becomes, in fact, first of all, a collection of various extraordinary religious experiences, and this is how Protestants read them, after all,
I know this perfectly well and finally, the church itself becomes de facto only a product of collective religious self-knowledge, so there is no room for its divine establishment. Therefore, even subconsciously, the attitude of many people, more and more modern and lukewarm Catholics,
Appears that there is faith, but not the church, as if it could be separated, as if it was possible to separate Christ the Lord from his Mystical body, in practice, modernists also put forward very serious postulates. First of all, what modern society is unfortunately already familiar with is the separation
Of church and state, as well as the implementation of self-government for national churches, that is, in fact, the establishment of episcopal conferences many tens or even more than 100 years before it became a fact, of course, as it was mentioned last time, episcopal conferences existed de
Facto but not de jury, i.e. they were not written down in church law, they did not have any official legal status, modernists also demanded the limitation of papal power and the reduction of ceremonies. ecclesiastical, all these errors quickly began to be proclaimed by, unfortunately, professors in
Theology departments and further in seminaries through the publication of books and that is why Saint Peter decided to deal with them, that is why the whole system of modernists was carefully considered and then because modernism is on the one hand the relativism of liberal Catholics and there was also a great influence of
Kant’s idealistic philosophy and Hegel’s evolutionary philosophy, and here, to briefly explain it, there are actually two main features of modernism. Kant believed that man creates various concepts within his consciousness, which is detached from reality, known through the senses and easily understood. exactly how such an assumption results in modernists’ religion
Based on consciousness, where everything comes from man, his needs, his feelings, i.e., the independence of what we believe in and what we think. It is independent of the actual state, i.e. of reality, i.e. here this aspect of Au Hegel’s consciousness one could say that
It complements Kant’s thought with the element of Progress, hence the name that it is an evolutionary philosophy. The most important thought here is the assumption that all historical events are only different revelations of one reality, which is the infinite Spirit and God.
So in this approach, it appears as if more clearly with the passage of time, i.e. With the passage of history So we see here that revelation is not something finite that was once transmitted and should be faithfully preserved, but is something fluid, something changeable, i.e. the claim about evolutionary religion and
Also the falsely understood so-called living tradition that has just been taken from Hegu, i.e. living tradition as, in fact, a change in the deposit of faith. With the passage of time, people’s awareness of the perception of the world, how society functions in a given period, and finally, the
Direct one can be said to be the infamous father of modernism who in 1902 published the book The Gospel and the Church, it was published very quickly placed on the index of prohibited books and its most important statements were just analyzed and condemned by Pius And here he actually
Applied Kant’s idealism and subjecting it to evolution Well, that’s acceptance Hegel’s philosophy about the changeability of philosophies which are in complete contradiction with the realistic philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas. As for the encyclical Pascendi itself, which is the main work that condemns
Modernism, it was published on September 8, 1907 with the subtitle of the encyclical of the Holy Father Pius X on the principles of modernists and as I said, it was preceded by the decree lamentabili sane Exitu of July 3 , 1907. In this encyclical, Saint Pius church
, but in the church itself they are hiding, so to speak. We will say in the very interior of the church, therefore they can be more harmful because they are less visible, so we will speak, venerable brothers, not about any Catholics, but about many of the
Lay Catholics and, what is more painful, about many of them. priests, if it were not for the fact that the Pope wrote it, many would certainly try to discredit it today, that it is one of the next conspiracy theories, that there are enemies of the church inside the church, but here Pius
10 is actually extremely alarming, saying that there is a great danger for the entire functioning of the church, but for the faith of the faithful, so let’s see with what clarity and depth the pope describes the attitude of modernists, he wrote: Let them rebuke them as much as they want,
Their own conscience and inner knowledge give them the certainty that they deserve not reprimand but praise. Besides, they do not forget that progress cannot take place without struggles and struggles without sacrifices, that is why they are ready to make sacrifices following the example of
Christ and the prophets. Do we see that the mere readiness to make sacrifices does not mean that we are in true faith, they give us awareness and prudence, and we also claim that the authorities do not one should destroy it, but rather inspire it, also
Staying within the church out of necessity in order to imperceptibly change the collective knowledge itself or exactly what the modernists are talking about, thus admitting despite their will that the collective self-knowledge is not on their side and that the uncalled
Impose themselves on its interpreters such This is the same, brothers, as is the theory of the modernists, and both say that there is nothing permanent in the church, nothing that is unchangeable, and I think that for most believers today, this is the impulse to seek the truth. There are extreme manifestations
Of this attitude of constant changeability. constant introduction of new things, constant apostasy, what has been conveyed so far, even what is still traditional in the church after the Council, Saint Pius with the help of constant pressure, through various compromises, through fluctuations between orthodoxies, to constantly push
The church, as they say, for its good, to come to terms with the modern world, because the progress of modernism depends on the clergy and believers ceasing to resist the growing influence of this world, that is,
To let the spirit of the world into the church and it is about the overthrow of the so-called Christians, that is, the society of permeation of Catholic life completely consistent with what the Church has always preached and with the commandments. The Church is gradually
Capitulating according to them. What was still unthinkable even after the changes of the Council immediately at the end of the 1960s and in the 1970s is now becoming already the facts of subsequent progressive postulates, the manifestation of such mature modernism in quotation marks is the functioning of the synodal path, where
It is the expectations of the world of people to penetrate the church, as in this graphic illustrates the synodal path, somewhere out there. Among these people, the world is mixed and it must be admitted that the encyclical Saint Pius _ _ eliminating bad elements , thus constituting a barrier for healthy elements, so
That what is healthy in the church is protected, which is why Pope Pius the definition of modernism is to help indicate the false current on the one hand and thus create a powerful boundary line for the healthy current, i.e. the explanation of what Mod is
Is to show us what to protect ourselves from, what to avoid And what is the normal traditional Catholic faith and what we should stick to for this reason in fact , the encyclical of Saint Pius causes of modernism and is looking for
Remedies, the pope in the encyclical itself, a very careful researcher will notice the guidelines that fit right in, we can only say about the false direction. That is, if, for example, modernism assumes that one can do, should the heart be the only oracle In matters of faith, for
Example, it is not modernism to give the heart a share in the spiritual and inner life and in the life of faith is also not modernism, for example in the buckles we can say this Chariot of God’s truth and on the other hand, if modernism is a method that proclaims absolute subjectivity in
Matters of faith, that everything depends on human consciousness from human conscience, it is not modernism to take into account development and progress and various changing circumstances at all, so here we see that this border actually had to be precisely defined so as not to cut ourselves off from healthy elements,
This is also the danger of the heresy of modernism, that many things are quite true or good Plat’s elements completely distort their meaning in the previous lecture, so I repeatedly returned to the short critical analysis of the Orders of Cardinal Ego and
Cardinal Abe, and they actually point there even when it comes to the very definition of the Holy Mass which is mentioned in the Constitution promoting the new Mass and the introduction to the new Missal they say that these definitions and slogans
That appear there are each separate, it would be difficult to accuse them of some heresy or that in a certain context they should not be accepted, but looking at the omissions regarding the fundamental dogmas of the Catholic faith regarding the
Holy Mass, they do not appear there at all, and at the same time a collection of these inconsistent elements as a new definition of the Holy Mass are indeed something impossible to accept at this point, simply because of what they consist in, so there is also the danger of modernism, as
I said, it is a departure from scholastic philosophy which was based on Saint Thomas Sakin and which has so far been the basic guideline teaching and also seminary formation, it is the scholasticism of the Kala School that, in a very clear definition, provides what is
Unfortunately so lacking in today’s very vague and unclear philosophy, and it also teaches us to base metaphysical statements and full-blown statements on rational attitudes, and this does not prevent us from using from today’s thought and philosophy, or rather, on the contrary, it helps to make good use of it, it warns against
Falling into mistakes and strengthens the mind to reach for what is healthy and uplifting, this is very important because modernists take as the basis of SJ philosophy of religion the science defined by agnosticism, what is this science, then, according to this view, the human mind is completely closed when
It comes to phenomena, that is, it knows only those things that appear and in the form in which they appear, so it has neither the right nor the ability to exceed these limits, therefore the mind the human being in itself cannot
Rise to the Lord God or know his existence on the basis of things seen, this is a very serious mistake, and modernists conclude from this that the Lord God cannot be the direct object of our knowledge. And when we talk about is about history, God cannot be considered a
Historical person, but what will happen to natural theology, what will happen to the motives of belief, what will happen to external revelation, which the church professes, all this is completely ignored by modernists. They refer us to intellectualism, which they call a ridiculous system and have long ago extinct despite the
Fact that the clear indications of the first Vatican Council read differently, in which we read: If anyone claims that God, the one and true creator and our Lord, cannot be known with certainty by the natural human mind by the light of created things, let him be anathema, which is
A heresy previously condemned by the church and error and so on If anyone says that it is neither possible nor profitable for God’s Revelation to instruct man about God and the honor that is to be shown to Him, let him be anathema, that is, anyone who rejects
This external Revelation of God as something objective and finally If anyone claims that the reliability of God’s revelation cannot be confirmed by external signs, that people should only be inspired to believe by each person’s internal experience or private inspiration, let him be careful. This is what
The foundations of our faith are based on, that Christ the Lord himself proved his divinity with external signs, precisely fulfilling prophecies and performing miracles That is, also giving a sign of the deity to their divine power, that is, according to them, religious statements are something relative and are not at all
Certain, hence the frequent attitude, one can say And how do we know if it is really true? How can we be sure and the result of modernism is, according to the encyclical Pascendi agnosticism That is, according to the holy dog is defined as a place where man finds God
Without the help of external revelation but only through his own feelings and desires, here the Christian doctrine in fact in this approach supposedly grows from listening to one’s own interior or, as today in the synodal way, from listening to the voices of people to their
Religious experiences that they have and from their own desires and must correspond to our needs, which must be a reflection of them, hence the attitude I am not interested in what the church says about the laws of faith But how I feel and understand given fragments of the Holy Scripture,
As I said, taken from Protestantism the method of reading the Holy Scripture is precisely what it says to me, how I read it, how I relate it to my life, is a pure attitude. A modernist Catholic will first always consider what the Church says on this subject. What is a certain interpretation
Of these words of our Lord, how should they be understood, what Truths of Faith teaches us what virtues we should imitate only when we know what the church interprets these holy scriptures, only then do we apply them to our lives and
It also excludes any possibility of regulating our lives. On the basis of some unchangeable and objective criteria of good and evil we also see in this post-conciliar teaching. These criteria good and evil are fluid, what was unthinkable even 50 years ago is now becoming a reality,
Accepted or, as they say, reaching for too, as they say, precise dogmatic tests that could mean the priority of authentic faith over the mystery of religion both in us and in Christ according to them, it is simply a spontaneous fruit of nature , i.e. this inner religious feeling, according to them, Jesus
Christ himself slowly and gradually came to understand who he was and did not have divine knowledge at all, hence he did not teach authentically as a true God and here one can wonder whether the modernist philosophy can be called agnosticism is a negative side
In modernist teaching, the positive side is life immanence. What does it consist in? Modernists say that natural or supernatural religion requires, like any other fact, an explanation in man himself, so they want to look for it. explanation because according to them, religion is a certain form of life, so in human life
We need to look for an explanation of this religion in this way, modernists to SJ the principle of the so- called religious immanence And what should be considered according to this science as the final cause, the source and the first symptom of life phenomena,
Especially religion? a need or drive appearing in a person, we see here the complete madness of such an attitude, human drives, variable needs are supposed to result from religious truth, the beginning of religion in general, so here we need to consider how
They are trying to define faith because the subject of religion is God, so faith is the beginning and the basis of all religion is a certain inner feeling that arises from the need for what is divine. This is precisely what we see that today, most clearly, charismatic communities are
Based on the stimulation of these feelings and not, as traditionally, on the acceptance of the objective truths revealed by the Lord. God, so if we base our faith on certain religious experiences or feelings, there is indeed a basis for this faith to be fluid and changeable; if we consider
That this need for God can only be felt in certain appropriate conditions, it cannot by itself belong to the scope of consciousness. so according to them it is hidden below consciousness or, as the expression borrowed from newer philosophy sounds, under the threshold of consciousness, that is,
For them faith is some kind of projection of a person’s subconscious. So what do they think are the beginnings of religion, so it is unknowable whether it is external to man and Outside the world visible or hidden, as they claim, in the subconscious
Of man, this need for God causes in the soul inclined to religion a feeling of a particular kind and without any previous intellectual act, as fideism teaches, that is, without the use of reason at all, this feeling contains within itself
The reality of God as its object and its an external cause and connects man in a certain way with God and it is this feeling that modernists call faith and they consider this feeling appearing in man to be the beginning of religion,
Therefore it must follow from the principles of modernists that all religions are true, as we read in the encyclical, the science of experience in connection with the second one about symbolism places the mark of true religion on every religion, including pagan ones, because in every religion we encounter the religious experience of other
Members, what right do modernists have to refuse to recognize the experience they profess? For example, the Mohammedan religion and they recognize true experience only among Catholics, for what reason could it be possible, according to their system, to attribute falsehood to some religion, probably due to the incredible
Religious feeling, and yet the religious feeling is always one and the same, or maybe sometimes less developed, for a statement to be considered true, it is enough that it corresponds to the religious feeling of a person and his faith,
Even if the mental level of that person was not special here we see that precisely from this false view, which completely undermines the authenticity in the Christian religion, stems the entire modern ecumenism, i.e. SP. For this reason, it is obviously normal that we meet and pray together with Muslims, Jews,
Various Protestants, heretics, schismatics, there is actually none here importance because everyone’s religious experience must be recognized as true, why must we deny this authenticity and then the only thing modernists can admit is that among various religions, the Catholic religion has more truth and
Is more vital, and at the same time that it is more deserving of the name Christian and more agreeing with the beginnings of Christianity, and here one can wonder whether Catholics and even priests do not act as if they recognized these monstrous errors. And unfortunately, we see that
Catholic laypeople and clergy in practice act as if they recognized them as such, they shower the preachers of these errors with such praise and honor them publicly that everyone will probably think and do not honor people who perhaps deserve a certain share but the errors preached and spread by them this was already
Written by Saint Pius Protestants or Jews is a testimony to the approval of the church authorities towards such erroneous attitudes when it comes to the very concept of revelation, which also finds Mod in this feeling only faith, but together with it and in it, in fact,
Revelation because and What more can be demanded from the concept of revelation Why could not talk about revelation or at least about the beginning of revelation when this religious feeling appears in human consciousness. Why couldn’t we say that then the Lord God Himself is in this feeling, although it is still
Not clear that He reveals Himself to the soul and here what conclusions flow from it, of course. Hence, first of all, this very absurd claim of modernists that, according to different points of view, every religion is natural and supernatural, i.e. supernatural, therefore using
The words consciousness and revelation in the same meaning, hence, finally, the principle of religious consciousness as a universal norm that has a value equal to its revelation, which, they claim, should be subjected to by everyone even the highest Church authority , whether in its teachings or in its regulations regarding cult or
Discipline, when it comes to the creation of religion, it is the religious feeling that is not only, one might say the seed of the entire religion, but also the meaning of everything that has been or will be in any religion and
The development of it religious feeling initially, as it is clear from this, it is quite shapeless and indefinite, but slowly, under the influence of some hidden element from which it actually developed with the progress of life, with the progress of humanity, so
The faith also develops and changes, which, as we said, is it is a certain form , i.e. here progress in religion is very emphasized, changes that are supposed to improve it all the time, improve it all the time, adapt it all the time Well, in
Fact, the summary of it is this attitude of AD ornament, modernization of letting the spirit of the world into the church and whether in this way every religion was created, even this supernatural one and according to the modernist attitude, as Saint Pius that no one
Had or will have before him and it was created no other way, as we said, through this process of life immanence and one can also talk about the supernatural order in general, of course, unfortunately, it is no longer about the old error of Pelagianism which
He attributed to human nature, one could say the right to order is still there, but I will go much further in modernism – since it dares to claim that our most holy religion, both in the humanity of Christ and in us, arose by itself as a work of nature, there is really no
Other way that would be able to shake the entire supernatural order more strongly and here the question of the participation of reason in the act of faith is also important, because whether this feeling has an exclusive role in religious matters
Is also of no importance here, and here, of course, modernists will answer that in no case, that it is necessary to take into account that God reveals himself in this feeling man, but so indistinctly and so vaguely that it is difficult to distinguish him from the believer from the believing
Subject, or at all, hence there must be some light to illuminate this feeling so that God appears in him more clearly, and this is where reason has to fulfill, which is the to think and analyze and the question of the beginning and concept of dogmas according to
Modernists in certain original and simple formulas which in a certain respect are for faith, the beginning of dogmas is necessary because until a clear knowledge of God appears in consciousness It is about the real According to them, there can be no question of revelation and the dogma itself contains
A procession. That is, the process is something absolutely certain and absolutely unchangeable, which is the main thing we need to pay attention to in order to have a proper concept of dogma, here we need to examine the relationship between these religious formulas and certain statements given by
Religion . and the religious feelings that appear in a person will come to someone who remembers that the only purpose of such forms is to provide the believer with a means to realize his faith, to become aware of his faith. That is, a completely wrong concept
Of dogma, so what is presented here in more detail? The relation of these formulas to the believer and to his faith and here, in fact, dogmas only have the role of mediation, i.e. they mediate between a believer and his faith, that is,
Due to faith, they are only imprecise signs of its content, that is, in fact, symbols of those feelings that appear in a person, because of the believing person, they are only tools, so symbols and tools cannot by any means be claimed to contain any absolute truth
According to them and this is an extremely disastrous approach because it opens up to this evolution of dogmas as symbols are therefore dogmas only images of truth and not the truth itself, therefore they should be adapted to religious feelings that change Over time, as tools, they can also be
Bridges of truth, not the truth itself, and should adapt to man, taking into account his religious feelings and because God, who is the object of religious feeling, may manifest himself precisely in infinitely many different forms because a believer can also be in different conditions, so the formulas of faith that we call dogmas
Must be subject to the same variability. In fact, the list of modernist heresies is, of course, much longer. According to them, the dogma must evolve and must be adapted to the feelings of the faithful. All religions are in a sense, as I said, they are true, they have
Truths because they are all rooted in the profound need and in the religious feeling of every person, this means a complete departure from the dogma that extra ekle nulla, i.e. there is no salvation outside the church, science and faith,
So according to this approach they must also be separated, so theology, the science about God ceases to be, it ceases to meet the criteria of scientificity here, in fact, in the event of a conflict, faith according to them must give way to science, the principle of faith, in this
Case it is a certain immanentism, i.e. the internal principle which is God, so God is inside people, according to man hence, even without the need for an external act of faith, every person can be perceived as a believer, as a result
Of which it also leads to a departure from external gestures of faith, just as tradition emphasizes that gestures of prayer, their content must emphasize and express the content of the faith that we profess, and that silences already testify
To apostasy or change of faith in the church, according to them, democracy should naturally prevail, the papacy and bishopric should be interpreted, i.e. new formulas for their functioning should be found, and the authority in the church should be weakened and revised, in addition, there should be
A separation of church and state precisely in the name of the secular concept of politics, i.e. It is it is directly the fruit of the French Revolution and according to them everything must be historicism, the matte of Christianity, it is necessary to distinguish between Christ
Understood in terms of emotional faith and historical Christ, therefore, Moreover, modernists demand the recognition of the priority of active virtues over passive virtues, we see this in practice in the post-conciliar church. means, of course, this approach was condemned in the past as the heresy
Of Americanism. This means that only what concerns external help for one’s neighbor, i.e. works of mercy, of course, are praiseworthy in themselves, but we see the concentration of the church’s activity on only the deeds of mercy, those external to the body, on some work, on purely
Practical considerations of religion over what is not so practical, for example, the development of virtues, the development of faith, hope love and the cardinal virtues, this aspect remains completely and we see it in practice in post-conciliar teachings. Where in sermons we do not experience in
Practice teaching about the fight against vices. They also demand the reform and simplification of the liturgy, i.e. the abolition of numerous services and practices. People’s seriousness of the poor church, which all the time we hear about prelates and bishops deprived of
The external signs of their dignity and in practice we see bishops who often do not even wear a cassock abolishing the celibacy of the clergy the constantly recurring topic of decentralization of power and democracy in the church we see the way of
Lay synodals even to the election of parish priests and bishops and in the face of this flood of errors, Saint Pius 10 defined modernism as a stitch of all heresies, a straight path leading to atheism, and if someone had taken the trouble to collect all the erroneous statements
Against the tower and, as it were, squeezed the juice and blood from them, he probably could not have done it more precisely than the modernists, who collected all errors, one could also wonder whether this set of errors condemned by the encyclical ”
Maw” is a current document for us, but today we are actually faced with the same errors proclaimed in a more open, even brazen, more radical way, even by eminent representatives of the teaching church, even by bishops therefore, the situation is actually much worse due to the extent of the contamination we are
Dealing with, of course, it must be emphasized, and I think that in the previous lecture it was very emphasized that we cannot decide about someone’s bad will, that when it comes to those who preach these modernist errors because the good or bad will of a given conscience remains
Unknown to us, but precisely because until someone is officially admonished and called to retract the errors, the bad will would result in the refusal to comply and consciously reject these warnings since the highest authority of the church does not admonish those who preach these modernist errors, these heresies, we cannot really
Decide about their bad will until this point, as before. He emphasized that I myself am deeply convinced that the majority of those who even preach or practice these errors have really good will, but they are just so permeated by the faith of the Church
Of divine revelation. that they are convinced that they are simply doing good and that by fighting against tradition they are defending the faith of the Church. Saint Thomas also makes a very interesting distinction when he considered the recognition of the Messiah by the Jews at the
Time of the coming of the Lord Jesus, he talked about the so-called majores, i.e. the teaching church, i.e. certain experts and minores that is, the taught Church , i.e. ordinary believers, the first ones who had the predisposition and knowledge to reject Christ consciously rejected Christ while
They could have remained in some ignorance. If we apply this distinction to the case we are concerned with, we can say that there were and are modernist experts, such as priest Alfred, who we spoke at the time of Saint Pius 10 or later , the Holy See
Of PR could not have failed to realize that the Holy See condemned the views they professed as erroneous, and so they should have strictly obeyed what the Church had taught, but 60 years after the Council, the situation is
Much more complex and allows us to assume a greater or lesser degree of ignorance on the part of many deceived believers. Unfortunately, conscripts and even priests were taught according to the patterns of the new theology, and as far as we can say the masterminds of the heresy
Of these majors, Paragraph 22 of the encyclical Pascendi reminds us of another important distinction, Saint Pius 10 points out that it is difficult to define this immanentism according to modernists to the truth because in this respect there is disagreement among them, they all start from the same assumption but differ in
The conclusions drawn from it, some, one could say, go all the way, others hesitate, still others retreat, many say I do not support these radical theses at all, but in practice I act completely differently – by taking an active part in all this,
I claim to believe in the deity of the Lord Jesus and his real presence in the most holy sacrament, but one receives communion in the hand or whether one believes one claims to believe in the presence of the Lord Jesus in
Every particle and, for example, the traditional discipline of the church was abandoned, for example, the priest should not separate his fingers after the consecration so as not to drop the particles which most likely are on his fingers or about the use of the paten during Holy Communion, so in practice, deviation from
This causes no cleaning of the particles. So if we believe that the Lord Jesus is present there, it is in fact a conscious desecration, so we see a complete contradiction in attitudes even among the modernists themselves, and this it is
Probably one of the many main features in 1946, interestingly enough, the famous Father Garig la Grange was already sounding the alarm exposing the damage caused by the so-called new theology. This is what modern trends in theology were called after
The condemnation of modernist theses, so in order to avoid the charge of heresy, Zac should call it it was simply a new theology that in practice returned to modernism , once condemned by Saint Pius. 10 4 years later, with the encyclical of Pope Pius
From which the council borrowed the false principles that were the basis of the declaration of dignitatis humane, i.e. the declaration on religious freedom which was contrary to the earlier teaching of the Church, i.e. In short, the council undeniably sealed the triumph of liberalism and modernism
In the church and in fact it was the unleashing of the forces of evil for the ruin of the church from here Archbishop le fever’s expression about the church steeped in modernism is also taken into account , i.e. Of course there are effects and there are causes,
The effects can be felt on a very wide scale and in this respect we can compare the consequences of the council to radioactive waste after a nuclear explosion, radioactive contamination occurs not only in the epicenter of the explosion, but its range expands with this radiation in all directions and the council spread
The loss of faith and desacralization which spread to all areas of church life, the liturgy was then reformed and the wearing of cassocks was abandoned in practice for priests and much much more However, the most telling thing is not what strikes us in everyday life or how various ecumenical meetings
Are held in the presence of the Pope himself, such as with John Paul II in Assisi in 1986 and 2002, as well as in Rome in 99 or with Benedict 16 in Naples in 2007 or Benedict _ written in the declaration dignitatis humane or about the secularity
Of the state contained in the Constitution Gaud Or ecumenism in the decree unitatis integration of the Second Vatican Council, i.e. principles that are in contradiction with the unanimous papal magisterium from before the council how is it possible at all that a modernist will always give
The impression of a Catholic This is precisely on this basis the novelty of this heresy lies in the fact that it wants to constantly give the appearance of Catholicism, like every heresy, there is a certain system where everything is internally consistent, but unlike other
Heresies, modernism is a system that does not exist as a heresy, and a very cursory reading of it reveals a very unclear, very ambiguous picture that can to apply for each of its points or to be taken separately A lot of changes are being made on the orthodox side
For a favorable Orthodox side, and that really nothing has changed, everything is the same all the time, an example is the sakum kum constitution, i.e. the last document The first document adopted on the Vatican Council stated that in fact nothing changes in the liturgy. And yet in practice a revolution was made in
The liturgy of the Church or the last document of the teaching of faith, declaration, signature of the couple’s blessing non-sacramental and homosexual, of course emphasizing that it is not the sacrament of marriage, so in fact I am trying
To convey myself to give such a message that de facto nothing changes in the teaching of the church in the already mentioned encyclical, the mouth of the main document of the Holy See against the heresy of modernism in paragraph ś mentions skillful and cunning
And that modernists can easily mislead anyone who is not careful, therefore, in the second paragraph, the Pope writes that these are enemies that are even more harmful because they are less noticeable, and paragraph CW gives a detailed analysis of this tactic. Modernists, according to their principle, do not present their doctrines
Arranged in a certain order and collected into a certain whole, but as if scattered and separated from each other in order to appear unstable and, as it were, unstable, while at the same time they are certain and firm, that is, here we see Saint Pus 10 very
Specifically exposes these actions of modernists. Therefore, contemporary actions should be looked at precisely from this perspective, which means that the introduced changes are the implementation of a broader plan, gradual but systematic, and not some accident or the appearance of some doubt.
An example of such a tactic is, for example, the Apostolic Amoris Letitia from 2016. It was not some vague, uncertain formulations, but a preparation of the ground for what was introduced recently. If modernism aims at such extent to maintaining the appearance of orthodoxy is because His goal is to seize power
By causing the church authorities to adopt the point of view of the modernists as their own and this is what we are dealing with, what has unfortunately happened among modernists as Saint Pius X further teaches in paragraph 37 of his encyclical awareness and prudence, they claim that
The authorities should not be destroyed but rather inspired. In fact, they want to stay within the church and necessarily change, unnoticed, the same collective knowledge that they are convinced is the church, i.e. the mentality of the faithful and the clergy, to actually talk to people in
Parishes that it turns out they don’t really know what even the Holy Mass is, they don’t know, they don’t see the need to go to confession, it’s also a matter of many consenting to many other mistakes, such as the functioning of lay ministers, the removal of balusters,
The introduction of altar boys, dances, concerts in churches, all this was in the Christian Catholic mentality 50 years ago it was unthinkable, it was unacceptable And today, a huge part of them simply accepts it or is familiar with it. I think that the issue of such controversial things as dances and
Concerts still has a conservative disposition even if they are drafted. It causes outrage, but for example, What is the Holy Mass, there is no understanding here, so are surveys sometimes carried out to ask people leaving the new Mass What is the
Holy Mass, most of them respond with a meeting, a feast, a conversation, a prayer, and there is no definition of the Holy Mass at all. C the shortest, of course, uncertain But the shortest one, i.e. the realization of the sacrifice of the Lord
Jesus on the cross, which is obvious for those who practice in the Catholic tradition. What is the reason for this, where does this modernist crisis come from, it is already present in the times of Saint Pius X. Pas gives us a very precise and
In-depth answer. Pope Saint Pius it influences the soul much more strongly to blind it and lead it to wrong paths. In the modernist doctrine, it is as if at home, it receives nourishment from all sides and can make itself at home as it pleases. Modernists consider this pride to be a universal rule
And they base it all the more boldly and audaciously on it. They pride themselves when they claim that they only speak wisdom, and those who are puffed up and arrogant say that We are not like the rest of people, and in order not to be
Compared to the rest, they invent and commit the greatest absurdities, and these few lines actually say everything, and this is exactly what we are also seeing in the in the field of theology If someone wants to be respected or to come out, he must be very original,
Say more and more controversial and modern things, but a true saint, just like the church, has always emphasized that he does not want to be the original true Catholic desires to be only a humble follower of Christ. Holiness comes only from the complete renunciation of everything purely
Human and worldly. The best example of this principle is the reform of the missal made by Saint Pius V. There is nothing more typical of Catholicism when it is healthy and free from Protestant and modernist influences than the real one can actually say hatred and reflexive aversion to any change,
Regardless of what issue, that could lead to a love of something new, and to such an extent that certain liturgical gestures were retained in this reform of Pius Pius, although their practical application has completely disappeared but precisely for fear of unauthorized change in the liturgy or,
In this way, also in the expression of the Truths of the Faith, even those things that had lost their practical significance in the liturgy of the Church were retained, and it was the modern revolution initiated by Luther and Calvin and taken up further by Cromwell and the Puritan revolution inspired by
It is a gnostic desire to destroy the present because there are no longer eyes and hearts capable of understanding the centuries of hardships that led to its construction, i.e. the rebellion of modernists, such as in the times of St. Pius precisely because of the triumph
Of the flesh over the spirit, so it is impossible to please God and the world at the same time, which is exactly what modernism is trying to do, and here we need to speak directly about the egoism of modernists, because the human self
Will not really rest on declaring itself independent of God, it still wants to rule And to reign, this egoism wants to be in fact an idol and God, to decide about what is good and evil, so that the people and the needs of people can decide about what is preached in
The church, and that is why various gates and gates are opened that are supposed to lead to introducing further changes so that human feelings and experiences reign. Mod is the truth. Although he believes in his own way, his egoism comes from
The same source as the egoism of agnostics, and here are some short observations on the influence of modernism on the understanding of the Holy Scripture in the most mature Extreme form modernism leads to the fact that miracles are considered impossible, phenomena described in the holy books
As miraculous are considered natural, that is, they were performed by some natural means, for example, the crossing of the Red Sea or prophecies are considered as based on certain premonitions the truthfulness of the Holy Scripture in fact, modernists do not believe in external revelation, in the teachings
Of modernists faith is completely excluded, so it is not based on historical facts but only on subjective feelings, hence the historical Christ is different from the Christ whom one believes in, the historical church and the church that is believed in today, historical sacraments and sacraments in the modernist concept in the Lord Jesus,
Therefore, according to them, we should reject everything that goes beyond human relations, precisely beyond human nature. Rationalism and its newest symptom, i.e. modernism, are the fruit of Protestantism, which denies the church the right to teach in matters belonging to Christian faith and morality, so
By rejecting human reason revealed truth There is no doubt that it will not avoid dogmatic errors and various distortions, as it happened, so also that modernism came to power in the church, Saint Pius X already wrote in his encyclical that now
The enemies of the church are no longer outside the church, but inside, so it was clear that modernism will strive to assume power and influence from within the church, the first goal, of course, became theological seminaries, so that during the priestly formation the seminarians
Would imbue those who believe in it with agnosticism, from leading the faith to the feeling of granting Catholic dogmas only some relative truthfulness, denying the divinity of Christ the Lord, and this immanentism that is, the view that the knowledge of man is located inside him, and this means that
Religion also comes from the inside of man, especially from the innate sense religious and not from external revelation and symbolism, i.e. the belief that the truths of faith and sacraments are only symbols of the external, and I’m sorry, internal religious feeling, or to attract these seminarians, i.e. with democratic views, to
Democratize the church and various other progressive ideas, and as a result, to attract as many such modern seminarians as possible were ordained , i.e. they became priests, some of them later became bishops and some eventually became cardinals. Why did the church fight so decisively against
Errors precisely in accordance with the principle of Bonum Integra cauza malum defectum, i.e. good comes from the whole, evil comes from any defect, Saint Pius 10 revealed this crack in In the very bosom of the church and the clergy, Archbishop Le Febr
Repeatedly gave testimony to this interesting fact about this split, already visible at the beginning of the 20th century, which is why he went to study at the French seminary in Rome and not at the diocesan seminary in his diocese from which he came, having already seen modernist errors
, the first victims of modernism spreading there, just an example from the life of Archbishop Le Febra, which is very very important, the whole situation and the march of modernism to assume power in the church, the example concerns priest Lef Losz, superior of
The French seminary in Rome, he was a Frenchman, a Breton, very strong and constant . in faith who fought against modernism and warned his seminarians against it, i.e. the Seminary formation was very much aimed at pointing out errors in the faith so that future priests, future Bishops would be
Aware of them and, as a result, could save and defend their faithful and their decisions which they would later adopt and also warned against the condemned liberalism, i.e. the introduction of these false freedoms into the Catholic consciousness. And it was the steadfastness of Father Lef Losos in
Relation to doctrine and tradition that the progressive French government was very displeased with, which was afraid that Father Lew Losz, as the rector of the Seminary, many of whose graduates were becoming bishops to form many traditional conservative future bishops and their takeover of French dioceses who will give
The French church a traditional character and, of course, anti-liberalism by convincing it that Father Lef Fate belongs to the French campaign, that is, the party in France and the seminarians are agitating for this, Aion Franz, it was a movement ideological and political in the early 20th century of
A nationalistic and monarchist nature, i.e. it was created in direct response to the persecution of the Church by the left in France, its advocate and strong defender was Saint Pius 10 and also at the beginning Pius 11 was a supporter of this movement and also enjoyed this movement great
Support of the French right and the episcopate, but unfortunately, as a result of these intrigues, in 1926 the Pope condemned this movement and banned Catholics under penalty of excommunication from belonging to this organization. The pretext for this condemnation was the agnosticism announced by
The leader of this movement, Karl, and the punishment was, of course, later withdrawn by Pope Pius X , but only in 1939, as a result of this, there were two visits in 1926 to the French seminary in Rome and the rector was asked to resign
And here we see an example of organized action against traditional priests defending the doctrine of the church already in the 1920s or the deprivation the office of, for example, Cardinal Bilot, he was only suspected of having connections with the French action and Pope Pius he was a liberal, he had just issued
Documents defending the doctrine of the church, for example the encyclical Divini Redemptoris, which spoke about Christ the King, establishing the feast of Christ the King and postulating the universal reign of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the encyclical Divini Ilus Magistri, i.e. an encyclical regarding Christian upbringing
. Are these very important documents for those who want to defend the faith of the Church that is , it must be admitted that Pope Pius a rebellion in defense of the Catholic Church in defense of persecuted priests and believers, it was the Pope who negotiated and obliged them to lay down their
Weapons under the assurances of the communist government that they would of course be treated properly and no harm would come to them, and here it was visible. Unfortunately , the division in the church was becoming more and more visible and also unfortunately, the weakness and, in some respects , the naivety
Of Pope Pius able to believe that since he was assured that the safety of these people would be preserved , the massacre was committed, i.e. on a practical level he showed great weakness and great imprudence later during the pontificate of Pius one should wonder how the church was taken over by modernists,
Since Pius 12 still distinguished himself with such an attitude when it came to convening a council that was supposed to complete the Vatican Council, interrupted in 1870 , and deal with contemporary issues, or, for example, he spoke about it already during his pontificate Pius, but it was then that the cardinal warned
The Pope that the council could be, as he wrote, intercepted by the worst enemies of the church. So the modernists see that they were already aware of this at that time. Or that such a possibility actually existed and was a very
Serious possibility that the church authorities had to take into account and again in 948 , Pius _ the cardinals , on the one hand , strongly urged Pius the prudent attitude of Pope Pius Archbishop of Le Febra, it is mainly about a constant way of voting, but it was extremely
Different, it was visible that some Bishops voted on various projects all the time very consistently in one traditional conservative way, and others had a constant disposition in all matters, a very liberal approach. So we already see a great danger which emerged already during the preparation of
The council, an example of this approach was the vote that took place at the last meeting of one of the commissions before the first meeting of the council, then two extremely different documents were presented, two proposals that were later to be adopted at the council, one very liberal project by Cardinal Be
Concerning and titled on Religious Freedom, i.e. an expression of the modernist thesis on the equality of all religions, and the second traditional one by Cardinal Cheap entitled on religious tolerance, i.e. Freedom for the Catholic religion and only tolerance towards false religions, which was clearly emphasized and at the beginning of the council,
The candidates that had just been prepared were rejected bishops to further commissions, that is the candidacies that were prepared were simply rejected and in just a few days completely new lists of bishops were created who were to work in the council commissions, i.e. to further consider the projects that had been
Prepared by the preparatory commission. Completely liberal lists were prepared and they were appropriately printed and delivered to the council fathers as the proposal was already up for voting and it actually happened that these proposals of these liberal candidates won the most votes,
They obtained a majority, but not the 2/3 votes required by the provisions of the Council, but thanks to the approval of the Pope himself, the Pope’s consent had to be required for these candidacies d TR to enter into force. the composition of the commission, these liberal compositions
Were simply approved, and then Paul VI appointed his extremely modernist moderators of the council’s proceedings and, as a result, liberal cardinals and liberal bishops in commissions with a liberal composition had influences that were vaguely favorable to changes or even simply a revolution in the church.
An example here is the most striking one the reform of the liturgy which was the work of Father BUN, since 1955, Bishop Pinton Reli was given the task of translating Protestant books for Father Boni, who was then an ordinary member of the liturgical commission, later he became
A professor of liturgy at the Lateran University, but he had to leave there for modernism and progressivism. that, unfortunately, over time, he became the chairman of the commission for liturgical reform after the council, Archbishop Le Febr. He was at a meeting of the superiors general of the largest congregations in
Rome, during which they asked Father Bonini to explain the so-called new mass, what it is, then Father Bonini talked about it, in fact, about some a new invention about the introduction of changes to the national language about prayers to choose from about various possibilities of starting mass It would be something so completely
Shocking because he spoke as if the holy mass had not existed in the church at all until now the issues they asked about the postponement of the assemblies concerned what this active participation of the faithful which Pope Pius is the highest form of participation in the
Holy Mass, but we still see, unfortunately, a modernist approach, modernist evolution has removed the character of sacrifice and the need for its inner awareness in favor of sentimental songs, after all, there are no silent masses after the Council, this is clearly visible in the fact that priests even prefer to conduct
False artificial electronic the organist, that nothing should be played or that the Holy Mass should take place in silence and the introduction of oral dialogues, now this inner concentration is no longer absolutely required for the good reception of the Mass, but the answers, dialogues
Together with the priest or just that everything should also be loud and also bring to shorten the Holy Mass there, the superiors of the congregation were generally amazed that if he removed everything he mentioned or how long the new Mass would last, it was something completely scandalous for them, for example,
Cardinal Jouret after reading the definition of the Holy Mass after its publication or the definition contained in the introduction Doo said that’s why he went to Rome and met with Pope Paul VI and, as he reports, he begged him and said, Holy Father, you can’t leave this definition, it
‘s heretical, you can’t sign up to something like that, and the Pope, according to his report, admitted that he hadn’t read it before. signatures cise also did not pass the control of the Holy Office at all, it was simply authoritatively written by a priest by Paul VI without any verification, as
Evidenced by Cardinal Scheper, who worked in the Holy Office and testifies that it did not pass any control at all, and soon consent was also introduced to grant Communion in the hand was a matter of a few months, Archbishop le Febr Well, he has already decided
To intervene, that’s why he met with Cardinal Gut, prefect of the congregation for divine worship, and warned many people about the sacrilege of a complete lack of respect for the Holy Eucharist in the entire church, which will have dramatic consequences. Of course, this consent to giving
Communion in the hand, as we talked about, the modernist method, of course, officially it did not concern the entire church but individual episcopates, taking into account the subjectively defined quote and the judgment of specific conditions. So again, very relative individual aspects that were supposed to be
A pretext for introducing such practices as happened in 69 in the Netherlands, immediately spread to German countries already in 70 year, among others, the Vienna Decision and many others had official consent to administering communion in the hand or the constitution of sacraments sanum concilium itself,
We read there to support what can facilitate the unification of all believers in Christ and strengthen what leads to the vocation of all people to the bosom of the church, i.e. on the one hand Theoretically, it could be
Interpreted in a quite orthodox and traditional way, one could think that it is an encouragement for heretics and schismatics to return to the Catholic Church and a challenge to the entire pagan world of non-believers to convert, but unfortunately it is in fact simply
A gate that opens the liturgy of the church to Protestantism and secular elements. just to bring the faith of Christ closer to all, or to make the church liturgy similar to the Protestant liturgy, so that the dogmas of the Catholic faith are not clearly emphasized or omitted altogether,
So as not to offend non-Catholics, and, as I said, adding secular elements so that they do not express the Catholic faith, Cardinal Ringer in the introduction to the book Mons. Klaus Gamber wrote that we rejected the organic living process of growth and development over
The centuries and replaced it, as in the production process of a fabricated product, with a trivial product produced on the spot, of course later, in a burst of sincerity, Cardinal Racer repeatedly tried to justify himself with these words, but we see that only in 1956
Pius X wrote that you cannot, for example, separate the altar from the tabernacle. 10 years later it becomes a reality and a common practice, even an order in the church and, for example, Another issue of omitting the term is the complete omission of the term transubstantiation, i.e.
Transubstantiation, which Protestants do not believe in, this is the word they hate which is strictly and eminently Catholic and which is unacceptable to them. And yet the omission of this word in defining the Holy Mass sacrifice was condemned as heresy by Pope Pius VI. He directly wrote
That if the word transubstantiation is omitted when saying the Holy Mass, it is heresy and this is exactly what we are dealing with in the constitution of the sacraments sanum concilium in the Constitution missale Romanum introducing a new missal in 69
And in the introduction to the new Ordo there is not a single word transubstantiation or transubstantiation so this is straight heresy but on the one hand it can only be said that it has been omitted secondly, a very serious
Error in the Holy Mass, especially the removal of most of the old prayers and the way of worshiping, led to the decline of the sacraments because the new forms were taken straight from the secular world, i.e. from the profan, so it should literally be said here about the profanation of the
Holy Mass or the attestation of the character of the Holy Mass and in fact the new liturgy actually brings the Holy Mass closer to the faithful, it deprives the old rituals, it actually enters the very mainstream of completely secular life, but do we get closer to
Christ in the mass by rising to Him or by dragging Christ and the understanding of faith down to our own average world and reasoning, of course, the definition of modernist evolution that we heard earlier is stated directly in Article 21 of the constitutions of the liturgy of Sakum Kczy, we read
There that the Liturgy consists of an unchanging part coming from God’s institution and a part that is subject to change, which may or even should be changed over the years if they have crept into elements that are not quite there correspond well to the nature of the liturgy itself, or if these parts
No one has any criteria for deciding and defining what is less appropriate, in fact, completely abandon everything. Whatever he wanted and we read the same in article 50, the order of the Holy Mass should be changed in such a way as to make it more clearly
Visible and to facilitate the pious and active participation , which is exactly what we talked about earlier, for this purpose, it is necessary for this article to simplify the rituals and the above-mentioned fragments are in fact one of many others, because also the first article 23 62
Of this constitution show the ultimate goal of the Revolutionaries, i.e. the constant evolution of the Church’s liturgy that is, as faith and the understanding of faith change, the liturgy of the church must also become fluid, it must change, it must respond
To our changing needs and the needs of subsequent times, i.e., one of the basic principles of the constitution of the liturgy is the idea of the church being constantly in a state of reform, formerly the holy mass. was exactly the same all over the world,
Regardless of which priest officiated, it expressed the unity of the church and its divine origin, and not that it was a work of art, that is, it had unchanging content, but an expression of objective truth , i.e. the only truth that is precisely by its nature, which is unchangeable
Modernist definition of faith therefore, it refers to awareness, so the New Ordo must be understandable, i.e. adapted to the understanding of the faithful, which is why, by the way, the so-called masses with the participation of children are so popular, even with the participation of many adults, it is completely
Trivial to penetrate it, it does not require any effort, but you can just do it without without any commitment to survive the push of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs And many people say, or even many of the faithful, were happy with the conciliar reforms and are still happy with what
Is happening, saying now we understand everything, that is, it should be shown that it leads to such thinking that everything that anyone should be removed he might not understand what might be unclear or difficult for someone to accept. Article 37 of the Council’s Constitution on
The Liturgy says that what is not related to faith will not have any rigid forms and, furthermore, that it wants to preserve and develop what is good on the one hand. in different nations and tribes, or in practice does it mean
Adapting and changing the liturgy of the Church to different regions of the world, now we see it more clearly and radically, for example the proposed still accepted, but the practice shows a clear departure from the faith of the Church, adaptation to the Protestant liturgy, here a very
Short comparison of the Protestant liturgy and the old traditional Catholic Holy Mass, i.e. Protestants have three readings in the Catholic church, two of the readings in Protestants, lay lectors are allowed in the church In the Catholic Church, only the clergy are required to read the Mass. In Protestants,
The national language is used. In the Catholic Church, Latin is a purely sacred language, as a language that is extremely precise in its understanding. So we see that this is aimed at precision and preservation of the Truths of the Faith which, thanks to the use of a dead language,
Will still be understood in the same way. Thanks to this, the faith will not change in Protestants, there is a lot of standing attitude, standing communion in the Catholic church, a lot of kneeling, communion only in kneeling in Protestants, gradual introduction and encouragement to communion under both kinds
In the Catholic church for the faithful, only under one kind in Protestants, emphasizing the nature of the feast therefore, the inversion of the altars, which is common among Catholics, emphasizing the nature of the sacrifice to atone for our
Sins, so in the face of all this, we see that the backgrounds of life with which we now face the visions inscribed in the mechanism of the new mass are a certain avant-garde of further changes that are something natural for the modernist heresy that are to lead to their
Further legalization, for example, first introducing the illegal practice of communion in the hand, so that later it was legalized, at least officially interesting orts there is no document of the Holy See that authorizes the entire church universally to use communion in the hand, there is not
A single such document and yet it has become a practice also in the Holy See itself, i.e. on the one hand we declare no changes or only some relaxation and on the other hand the practice shows a complete departure from the ancient Truths of Faith, or here also the introduction
Of Ministers, further dispensers of Holy Communion, what has been in the West for decades has been legalized, and yes, it is a scandal in itself, but it was legalized only a few decades after it had already been implemented in pastoral practice
In in the West for a long time or the same liturgical dances and many liturgical dances, it’s hard to say, but that’s how it’s called and it’s actually true that when it comes to the Brotherhood, that we are disobedient, precisely disobedient to the enemies of the bone who
Have penetrated to modernize in their own way, we cannot be obedient in destroying the Holy Church because then you are actually disobeying our lord and the entire deposit, all the Pope and the Saints of 19 centuries of church history. There is no doubt that what is happening was announced by the Blessed
Virgin Mary and probably also by the third secret of Fatima, that the enemy is already at the highest levels of church power and here one may wonder whether we still have the right to oppose the heresy of modernism or maybe it is us who, by opposing this heresy, divide the church and
Resist. Pope Leo common evil, it is obvious that when the aim of the law is evil, it ceases to be universally applicable law. Pope Leo the mass has been destroying the church and destroying faith for the last 55 years, what
We can see. After the mass apostasy and the spread of this and pentecostalization of the church, after the council, it was a group of the most modern modernist bishops who took control over the congregation and almost the entire life of the church, for example
Cardinal Karoli, prefect of the congregation for the Order. Cardinal Biagio became prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Cardinal Hammer took power in the former Holy Office and many others and they were all very radical Progres and were declared enemies of the tradition
Of the church and in fact, as the Archbishop was accused of le febro And just as he openly admitted that in fact our the banner is the traditional Catholic Holy Mass, which has been the life of the church for so many centuries, and
The New Ordom is the source of corruption and spiritual death as a result of this modernist revolution, liberalism has unfortunately prevailed in the church. That is, what was one of the most important goals of Freemasonry, for the church to be permeated with the spirit the liberal world, i.e. the spirit of
The French Revolution, these errors cast doubt on human reason because there is no longer the ultimate truth, the absolute truth, to which we will give an account of our lives at the final judgment, they also cast doubt on free
Will, because there is no longer any right, man is completely free, they finally raise doubt conscience according to them, conscience is not something rigid, some rigid obligation of God’s law, we see this law is also starting to evolve, they talk about
Freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, that is, everyone can say whatever they want with impunity, even preach errors and scandals, they talk about Freedom of teaching, that’s why there are also many priests who they directly teach heresy, they teach their
Faithful this way, and for a century and a half, popes have been condemning these errors by imposing communiqués, and now this is part of the teaching, and it is this slow penetration of these errors that is destroying Catholicism in the encyclical humanum genus. Pope Leo XI wrote that the purpose of
Masonic associations is to destroy Christian institutions. Which means that the means to this end is the liberal mentality that has filtered into the church and these false ideas are gradually to replace the Ten Commandments. human rights, we also see the great involvement of the Holy See in
The work of spreading the idea of the UN or relying on the so- called human rights and slowly withdrawing what the Church has taught for centuries, the church has always talked about the rights of God which we are obliged to obey, only then will man be fully could
Develop Only then will it be free, just like the church has always emphasized freedom is the fruit, the point to which we strive by implementing God’s law, and now there has been a complete reversal and focus on human rights,
Our needs, which, as I said, is the basis of the entire heresy of modernism, these false ideas gradually transform the teachings of the church in the 10th century, Freemasonry had its own very specific program, this is now a quote from a certain document, penetrate the seminaries and through them
You enter the parish, reaching the clergy You will enter the rectory, entering the rectory, you will enter the curia of decisions, after the diocesan curria, another bishop will come who accept our ideas, when the bishops accept our views, the cardinals elected from among them will also accept them and One day, perhaps in
100 years, we will have a pope who will accept our views and at that time, with the help of the church, we will win the revolution, these words which were written at the beginning of the 19th century by a high Italian Carbonari and at the request of Popes
Gregory XV and Pius 9 were published and sent to all bishops so that they would be aware of what the purpose of Freemasonry is that they want to get into the seminaries first. Therefore, unfortunately, we see that these warnings were not fully taken into account. As he quoted on the beginning of the
20th century, that is, about 70 years later, Pope Paul can even imagine this old Christianitas What are the main manifestations of the heresy of modernism in the church, of course, the collapse of church discipline, further that heretical books receive the Imprimatur, that
The index of forbidden books was also abolished, which was to protect the faithful from errors and danger, it was his task to warn what was inappropriate not everything is good, it should be obvious Some of the clergy openly, for example, right after the council, still support contraception
And they remain completely unpunished, they are not reprimanded in any way, we still see another rotten fruit of the heresy of modernism, i.e. the laicization of Catholic countries, the Holy See implementing the council’s Religious Freedom where they showed its strict modernist sound, demanded from countries where the rule or the privileged role
Of the Catholic religion was recognized in their constitutions, demanded legal changes to recognize the freedom of all religions without exception, of course, nowadays it appears that it had to be like that C the church cannot, as an institution, derive any benefits from the state But this was not the purpose
Of teaching about the social reign of Christ, the church, having a privileged position in the state, is to be a tool for the salvation of people, saving them from eternal damnation, fulfilling the meaning of our life here on earth. What the temporal community cannot distance itself from, be indifferent to,
Or be indifferent to. act against this, so that a very important part of the teaching of the church and now the Holy See would start requiring states to change the law of exclusion foreseen in the position of the church, for example, by supporting the creation of completely secular secular states, and in fact,
Under this pretext of neutrality in worldviews, we are dealing with an atheistic state which fights faith and this was the case, for example, in Colombia or the Canton of Wales in Switzerland, where nuncioes intervened, demanding that the authorities change the Basic Laws so that there would be no provisions on the privileged
Position of the Catholic Church or, in fact, they were pushing for Catholic states and the social rule of Christ the King. this is directly contrary to the encyclical acid primas of Pius he is the prince of lies, Satan wants there to be different religions to lead people away from
The true faith, so de facto ecumenism has become a tool for dechristianization , especially pagans like Muslims. Are Jews or another fruit of the heresy of modernism is that the liberal spirit has penetrated the church and the liberal mind wants everyone? The freedom of these fruits of the
French Revolution. 50 years after the French Revolution, in the face of disastrous consequences, tendencies began, on the one hand, to completely cut off what was supported by the church and, on the other hand, to Christianize the principles of the revolution, i.e., as if their inclusion
Had been assimilated, it was a certain beginning of modernist errors and also today, as a result of this, of course, we cannot accept the principles of the world because they do not agree with all these abuses, so what should we do,
Is it obvious that we must return to tradition, it is absolutely necessary if we want a true renewal of the Church, it is not about prove that here everyone See the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius the social reign of our Lord Jesus Christ will affect all levels of legislation,
State institutions, education, and in fact, until we return to the old mass and old teaching, i.e., we reject the heresy of modernism and the agnosticism and liberalism associated with it, we will only be able to sit and weep over the mass
Apostasy, the emptiness of post-conciliar churches, over the misery of priests, over the low level of seminary formation, over the lack of vocations, so we see that there is a certain cure for this terrible disease, they are consuming the church, they are consuming the souls of the faithful and priests,
A return to tradition, what does this mean, should such an attitude be rejected, for example the pope and consider him a heretic, absolutely not, because no one has such competence, and considering the consequences of such a thesis, he will actually state
The fall of the church, and yet Christ the Lord said very clearly that the gates of Hell will not prevail against the Catholic Church, so we cannot under any circumstances go as far as to say that be able to remain a Catholic, this is what
Archbishop Le Febr emphasized many times, but nevertheless, the preaching and the errors show us that both the supreme shepherd, unfortunately, and most of the hierarchy are simply shepherds and we must not listen to them and must reject their errors. It is not our goal or even competence to reject them. hierarchs
, that is why in every Holy Mass we mention both the Holy Father, his name in the canon of the Holy Mass, and the bishop of the place, but our goal is not to reject them, but to help them return to the tradition of the church, and it was us who the founder
Kept telling us that when the truth found its rights, that tradition regained its place. then the church would find and experience its second youth in 1984 with the early Cardinal Racer admitting that the Second Vatican Council was a revision of Pius’ syllabus and the list of errors condemned by the church, i.e.
Condemning liberal rationalist and modernist theses. That is, Cardinal Ringer admitted that the council was the anti-New Year’s Eve of the French. He also said then that the church opened itself to doctrines that are not ours, but came from society, what does it mean, the so-called human rights and the liberal demands of the
French Revolution, that is why Archbishop Lebr said to Paul VI, we are indeed forced to choose between your Holiness and the council and the predecessors of your Holiness To who should be turned to the predecessors who confirmed the doctrine of the church and follow the innovations of the second Vatican council
Confirmed by Your Holiness, the paper was supposed to answer, we are not here to practice theology. And this is the most common argument of modernists, not to enter into a discussion about what has been changed, so that there would be no opportunity to point out errors at all,
Which is the only answer that could have been made, that there really is no enter into any discussion so that the scale of errors and heresy does not come to light as it is great and obvious that the faithful, having actually learned about it,
Having this comparison, knowing what the old mass is, the old teaching, were definitely looking for help, then you cannot go with certainty as the Archbishop emphasized, he has to make concessions in order to get permission to celebrate traditional masses, but he must preach or at least remain silent when
The words of the Apocalypse come to mind. Saint John looks like a lamb But speaks like a dragon, which is in fact the only ecumenism that tradition recognizes. What can be recognized is maintaining contacts with the modernist modernist participation in modernist errors is nothing
Else than the union of the church, the overthrow of the social rule of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the return to traditional teaching and the Holy Mass and the promotion of them is a real and concrete work. This ongoing great war between the church and the liberal
Modernist is so serious that in fact no one can avoid taking sides, which is worth emphasizing that it is not only about the few errors we have mentioned about ecumenism, religious freedom and liberalism, but also about the whole moral corruption and a completely new philosophy because based on modernist subjective philosophy precisely in
The post-conciliar teaching as a result of all this Well, in fact, everything is relative It all depends on the different contact of the situation, there are also many words that mean little and sometimes nothing at all unity, approach, accompaniment, Community, sacraments, sacraments of unity, discernment and many others making
Human rights or, more recently, climate rights, the main subjects of teaching is an expression of the departure from the Catholic faith, i.e. from striving for the rights of God and their observance, an expression of the modernist disposition of the post-conciliar authorities was given by Cardinal Racer, commenting in 1990
On the instructions of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith on the appointment of a theologian in church Don here, of course, tried to divert attention from the words that were said earlier and which, of course, did not go unnoticed. There are magisterial decisions that may
Not constitute the last word on a given topic, which are an expression of Pastoral caution, a kind of provisional disposition, i.e. Cardinal Rac specifies that some decisions of the Holy See as provisional decrees and then remains unchanged, but individual aspects influenced by time circumstances may require subsequent corrections. Examples include the declarations
Of the Popes from the last century on religious freedom, as well as the anti-modernist decisions from the beginning of this century and, above all, the decisions of the Biblical commission from that century. same period, we see that in a very simple way, as something obvious, Cardinal Ringer argues that the
Catholic faith has an evolutionary character, that something is true today, tomorrow it is no longer true, that teaching can be changed 180 degrees, that some things, as he wrote, must change and interestingly, those things that must change, as he mentions, are elements of the traditional doctrine of the church, as
The only result of this, and at the same time, Cardinal Ringer assures that the essence remains the same, only outdated elements are eliminated, but who determines what is the core that is supposed to remain here is not there are no definitions
Of this toilet, the effect of these changes are completely arbitrary and very far-reaching. Finally, I would like to quote what is the most complete summary and defense against these modernist errors, i.e. the anti-modernist oath that had to be taken by everyone who was ordained or
Assumed any office in the church since the times of Pope Pius 10 until Paul VI who, accepting these modernist errors, had to give up was bound by this anti-modernist oath and in every detail everything that was determined and declared by the infallible
Teaching office of the church, it first confesses that God, the beginning and end of all things, can be known with certainty and therefore his existence can be proven by the natural light of reason based on the world created, that is, from visible works created as cause by effects
Here we see exactly what modernists deny, secondly, external evidence of revelation, that is, God’s facts, above all, and miracles and prophecies are accepted and recognized as quite certain signs of the Divine origin of the Christian religion, I consider them to be completely appropriate for the mentality of all times and people including
Contemporary people, thirdly, I also strongly believe that the guardian church and teacher of the revealed word was directly and directly founded by the true and historical Christ when he lived among us and that this church is built on Peter, the head of the apostolic hierarchy and on his
Successors for all times or the church is not only a product of collective consciousness, its institutions and teachings could therefore be changeable, but that they are part of divine origin and unchangeable. Fourthly, it sincerely accepts the teaching of faith handed down to us from the apostles through the law of the
Faithful fathers, i.e. the traditions of the church, in the same understanding and concept , i.e. this understanding cannot change, therefore I completely reject as a heresy an invented meaning that would change from one meaning to another different from that which the church previously held. I also condemn any error
Which, in place of the divine deposit of faith which Christ entrusted to the SJ bride for faithful keeping, presents creations of human consciousness which born over time by the efforts of people, they are still to be perfected in an indefinite progress. Fifthly, I firmly
Maintain and sincerely confess that faith is not a blind religious feeling emerging from the depths of the subconscious under the influence of the heart and under the action of a well-disposed rational acceptance of the truth
Accepted from the outside from the outside listening by virtue of which we accept everything that has been said and revealed by the personal God, the Creator and our Lord, as the truth for the authority of God, the most true truths, I also submit with due respect
And with all my heart to the sentences of condemnation pronounced and to all the regulations contained in the encyclical Paszcza and the decree Lamentabili, especially as regards the so -called history of dogmas, I also reject the error of those who claim that
The faith given by the Catholic Church can contradict history and that Catholic dogmas as we currently understand them cannot be reconciled with a more accurate knowledge of the origins of religion. I also condemn and reject the opinion of those who say that an educated
Christian appears in the double role of one a believer and the other a historian, as if the historian was allowed to stick to what contradicts the belief of the believer or to put forward premises which would indicate
That the dogmas are either erroneous or doubtful As long as he does not directly contradict them, I also condemn this way of understanding and interpreting the Holy Scripture who, apart from the traditions of the church, the analogies of faith and the norms given by
The Holy See, accepts the invention of rationalists in a way that is both illicit and reckless, and considers text criticism to be the only and highest rule. I also reject the opinion of those who claim that the one who lectures
On the history of theology or writes about this subject should first to put aside all previous opinions both as to the supernatural beginning of the religion of the Catholic tradition and as to God’s promised help in the work of eternal preservation of all revealed truth, moreover, that the writings of the individual
Fathers should be interpreted according to scientific principles alone, disregarding all supernatural authority and with such freedom of judgment with which it is customary to examine any secular documents, and finally, in general terms, I declare that I am completely against the error that there is nothing
Divine in the Holy tradition or, what is much worse, those who understand the divine element in a pantheistic sense, so that nothing remains of the Catholic tradition except this dry and a simple fact, subject to historical inquiry on an equal footing with others, that there were
People who developed the school founded by Christ and his apostles in the following centuries with their activity, dexterity and ability. That is, exactly what modernism claims, that the tradition of the church is simply the development of the faith transmitted at the beginning by Lord Jesus, but a
Purely human development by subsequent generations of believers and successors of the apostles, which is an error, an error and a heresy, therefore I hold fast and until my last breath I will hold on to the faith of the fathers in the reliable charism of truth
Which is and will always remain in the succession of the bishopric from the apostles. And this is not in order to hold on to what may seem better and more appropriate for the culture of a given age, but never to understand otherwise the absolute and unchanging truth preached from the beginning
By the apostles. That is, we see a denial in the attitude of modern hierarchs of precisely this thesis that the task It is not the responsibility of the hierarchs to adapt or to make everything more appropriate for the people of subsequent centuries to be
Adapted to their understanding, but the task of the church hierarchy is to preserve, unchanged, exactly the same in the same understanding, the deposit of faith coming from the apostles and finally I vow that I will keep it all faithfully and sincerely and I will observe it not to violate it and that
I will never deviate from it, whether in teaching or in any other way, whether in speech or writing, I swear yes I swear yes, may God help me and this Holy Gospel of God and this was the document to which
The entire clergy was obliged take the oath, we see that some people did it falsely, since later, after the introduction of this obligation, they started to openly proclaim modernist errors God ZAP Thank you very much for your attention
source
