Four big questions about the economy I’ve been pondering:
Why don’t we have recessions anymore? The National Bureau of Economic Research has historical data on U.S. expansions and contractions going back to the 1850s:
Is 19th century data as reliable as today’s? Probably not but it’s obvious that recessions are fewer and far between than they used to be.1
It feels strange that we’ve had just one recession in the past 17 years that lasted just 2 months and didn’t involve a credit cycle.
The U.S. economy is far bigger, more mature and diversified than it was in the past. The fact that technology plays a bigger role and more workers are in the service sector helps as well.
Corporations are better run and more efficient. Plus policy makers are quicker to respond when disruptions do occur.
Interestingly enough, less frequent recessions hasn’t taken risk out of financial markets. There have still been bear markets. They’ve just been relatively short-lived.
I do wonder if there will now be bigger reactions from investors when the next economic contraction finally hits because we’re not used to them anymore.
Why hasn’t the housing market led to a recession? There is an idea from some economists that housing is the economy.
Research shows housing activity — making up nearly 20% of GDP — has been the main driver of U.S. economic cycles since WWII.
So why isn’t it having a bigger impact now?
Existing home sales have crashed because mortgage rates have been stuck above 6% for 3+ years and housing affordability is about as bad as it’s ever been.
It probably helps that housing prices never crashed, a lot of people locked in 3% mortgage rates and the unemployment rate has been below 5% for almost 5 years.
Enough people have low mortgage rates and housing wealth to offset the lack of housing activity.
But how long can this last?
That I don’t know.
Why aren’t rates higher? Inflation is still much higher than it was last decade. Government debts are astronomically high. Fiscal deficits don’t appear to be going anywhere for the foreseeable future.
Government debt to GDP is as high as it’s ever been outside of WWII.
Nothing stops this train.
And yet…
…10 year Treasury yields are well below the average of the past 65 years or so.
Some people think rates are high today because they anchor to the post-GFC world of 0% interest rates.
But today’s government bond yields are what I would consider normal (if there is such a thing in markets.
Bond yields don’t line up with the idea that government debt is a crisis.
All of the people predicting a government debt crisis should probably have an answer for this one.
Is this a normal economy finally? Consider the fact that:
- The U.S. economy is growing in the 2-3% range.
- Inflation sits at 3.5% (right on the 100 year average).
- The 10 year is yielding just below 5%.
- And the U.S. stock market was up 10% in the first half of the year.2
In the 2020s the economy has weathered a pandemic, supply chain shocks, a hot labor market, 9% inflation, a rate hiking cycle, tariffs, energy shocks and multiple wars.
We’ve been in a constant state of flux.
What if the current situation is one of normalization?
I could go for that.
It probably won’t last.
Further Reading:
A Government Debt Crisis?
1The average length in months here is peak-to-trough.
2OK, 10% for the year would feel more “normal” in terms of long-run averages. However, the average gain in an up year is 21% so we’re right on track.
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.
The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.
References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.
The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers
Please see disclosures here.
